244 réponses à ce sujet

[Khayness]

Slayer299 wrote...

lobi wrote...

This is is exactly how Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei started.

For those of us who do not speak or read German can you clarify please? The only word I know is "Deutsche" and that's it.

Thanks to the similarity to English, you can make out the national and socialist part of it, so nothing to clarify here.

[Wittand25]

Slayer299 wrote...

lobi wrote...

This is is exactly how Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei started.

For those of us who do not speak or read German can you clarify please? The only word I know is "Deutsche" and that's it.

NSDAP=Hitler´s party

[ginzaen]

what a joke.. i know da2 is not perfect but 2.5 did this reviewer even play the game... seriously

[WasGTIguy]

ginzaen wrote...

what a joke.. i know da2 is not perfect but 2.5 did this reviewer even play the game... seriously

I've said it before and I'll say it again.  Reviews are still opinions.  The negatives may have been deal breakers for said reviewer.  I would hope the scores would variy, since we all have different tastes.

Some people seem to have difficulty grasping this.

[Slayer299]

Wittand25 wrote...

NSDAP=Hitler´s party

Thanks!

[DungeonLord]

I think DA2 deserves at least a 5. I could even give it a 7, but then I'd have to close my eyes to the stupid enemy wave spawns and immersion killing scaling.

It's not a bad game... just not a very good epic RPG.

[Bathead]

Ummm... never mind. Didn't know the common usage name of Hitler's party was a no-no. Sorry.

Modifié par Bathead, 23 mars 2011 - 02:27 .

[Darth Executor]

Alex Kershaw wrote...

2.5 is far too low, just as 96% from PCGamer is too high. They all average out in the end.

I agree, however a score that low indicates severe butthurt from a loyal fan. Not good. The 96% indicates SOMEONE blew half the DA2 environment budget on bribes. Guess which one carries more weight?

[Maverick827]

WasGTIguy wrote...

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Reviews are still opinions. The negatives may have been deal breakers for said reviewer. I would hope the scores would variy, since we all have different tastes.

Some people seem to have difficulty grasping this.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: any review which detracts for subjective issues is useless, even more so if it does so in such a tactless and childish way as in the above gamecritics review.

[Darth Executor]

Persephone wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

Obviously that many negative reviews for an awful and rushed game can't be true. Maybe the gestapo have come back and are reading our minds right now?

S>Tin Foil Hat

That many? Professional criticsPaid Shills have been very positive about the game.

Fixed.

[BeljoraDien]

Bathead wrote...

Wittand25 wrote...

Slayer299 wrote...

lobi wrote...

This is is exactly how Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei started.

For those of us who do not speak or read German can you clarify please? The only word I know is "Deutsche" and that's it.

NSDAP=Hitler´s party

i.e. ****s.

You're giving Hitler's party four stars!? You are a sick, sick man.

[FellowerOfOdin]

So what? EA does the exact same thing by paying sites to give positive reviews - escapist much?

[Persephone]

Darth Executor wrote...

Persephone wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

Obviously that many negative reviews for an awful and rushed game can't be true. Maybe the gestapo have come back and are reading our minds right now?

S>Tin Foil Hat

That many? Professional criticsPaid Shills have been very positive about the game.

Fixed.

I'd appreciate it if you did not mess around with my posts. Disagree if you like, but do NOT put words in my mouth.

[CRISIS1717]

Persephone wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

Well that's great but the way I see it it's like a famous diva having a promising protege and then the protege becoming Lady Gaga.

Lets not forget Dragon Age established the franchise with critical acclaim. 

Well, it's your right to see it that way. I obviously don't but we can at least agree to disagree, no? And we both love DAO and ME2. That's something, right? 

They are certainly great games. Which is why I could never support Dragon Age 2 because I feel Bioware has taken a step down from quality and gameplay experience. You mention that you are using mods to sort out some of the issues you have with it but I don't believe a game even if it has a solid modding community behind it should have a less than adequate core experience to build on. 

[Zmajc]

Persephone wrote...

Darth Executor wrote...

Persephone wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

Obviously that many negative reviews for an awful and rushed game can't be true. Maybe the gestapo have come back and are reading our minds right now?

S>Tin Foil Hat

That many? Professional criticsPaid Shills have been very positive about the game.

Fixed.

I'd appreciate it if you did not mess around with my posts. Disagree if you like, but do NOT put words in my mouth.

Facts are still facts. No unbiased reviwer with any RPG knowledge would ever give DA2 such a positive score. 70-75% is about the maximum this game deserves.

[BeljoraDien]

For those saying BioWarEA has no interest in Metacritic scores:
http://multiplayerbl...sts-developers/

Metacritic scores are also brought up in various interviews, and the interviewee never dismisses metacritic as a something they do not pay attention to. They might quibble about how the scores are tallied, or whether they're fair or not (similar to how colleges complain about how college rankings are handled) but, in the end, they're paying attention to it.

[Korusus]

Maverick827 wrote...

WasGTIguy wrote...

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Reviews are still opinions. The negatives may have been deal breakers for said reviewer. I would hope the scores would variy, since we all have different tastes.

Some people seem to have difficulty grasping this.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: any review which detracts for subjective issues is useless, even more so if it does so in such a tactless and childish way as in the above gamecritics review.

Who is to say what is subjective and what isn't?  Unless you only expect reviewers to detract from scores for obvious bugs.  Some people claim to actually enjoy the recycled environments...doesn't mean it hasn't been the #1 reason so many reviewers have lopped off points from the game.  See...entirely subjective.

And I bet you have no problem with reviewers like let's say...PCGamer...that give high scores for completely subjective things as well.  "Man, this is so much more streamlined and engaging in all its streamliney-ness and insert marketing buzz word here."

[WasGTIguy]

Maverick827 wrote...

WasGTIguy wrote...

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Reviews are still opinions. The negatives may have been deal breakers for said reviewer. I would hope the scores would variy, since we all have different tastes.

Some people seem to have difficulty grasping this.

I've said it before and I'll say it again: any review which detracts for subjective issues is useless, even more so if it does so in such a tactless and childish way as in the above gamecritics review.

So, with your line of thinking the score should have been higher?  Seeing as some of the larger critics gave a good score?  Not every reviewer is going to share the same view point. 

This isn't a band wagon here.  If the reviewer didn't like it, I'd like to know.  The review was honest.  Not wrong, opinions rarely are.  His review hit on a couple points that have nothing to do with being subjective.  Reused maps and pop in battles, is fact.

[mesmerizedish]

Zmajc wrote...

Persephone wrote...

Darth Executor wrote...

Persephone wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

Obviously that many negative reviews for an awful and rushed game can't be true. Maybe the gestapo have come back and are reading our minds right now?

S>Tin Foil Hat

That many? Professional criticsPaid Shills have been very positive about the game.

Fixed.

I'd appreciate it if you did not mess around with my posts. Disagree if you like, but do NOT put words in my mouth.

Facts are still facts. No unbiased reviwer with any RPG knowledge would ever give DA2 such a positive score. 70-75% is about the maximum this game deserves.

Provide proof that professional critics were paid off before you claim that it's a "fact." Your own view on what "the maximum this game deserves" is is not everyone else's.

[Slayer299]

Maverick827 wrote...
I've said it before and I'll say it again: any review which detracts for subjective issues is useless, even more so if it does so in such a tactless and childish way as in the above gamecritics review.

While I can agree with you that the review did use language that was overly melodramatic about DA2, it is in fact no more "ridiculous" than sites like PCG who praise DA2 as the "RPG of the Decade" and give it either a 94 or a 96 rating when it was very simply worthy of neither.

[The Corporate]

Those pesky 4channers and their raiding of BioWare's perfect opus!

[Slayer299]

Khayness wrote...
Thanks to the similarity to English, you can make out the national and socialist part of it, so nothing to clarify here.

No, I coujld make out the words German and National, neither of which was clear as to what was meant. So, yes, clarification was needed.

Modifié par Slayer299, 23 mars 2011 - 02:53 .

[throwmeaname]

Alex Kershaw wrote...

2.5 is far too low, just as 96% from PCGamer is too high. They all average out in the end.

lol normal distribution

[Merkwuerdigliebe]

Good find comrade Andhaira, clearly this is nothing but vile propaganda against the motherland,