2875 réponses à ce sujet

[snfonseka]

The romances in Dragon Age 2 are for everyone, says the games lead writer, not just for the straight, male gamer.
Read the full article in here.

What I think what BW has done is totally dumb. They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters.  They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the characters' personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.  Well..., BW you have done the character development in your past games in great manner, so don't try to dumb down the character development now.

Modifié par snfonseka, 24 mars 2011 - 06:38 .

[Merecraft]

David Gaider has gone up in my estimation a lot for his response.

Anyway, does this need dragging up again? There is already a massive thread about it.

[aries1001]

The romances i DA2 are just that, romances. You'll need to actively pursue the romances in order to get to the -ahem- love scenes. (which, btw, consists of the two of you lying in bed. Then, the screen fades to black. And one you (as least from what I understand) have armour on while in bed...

If your main Hawke is a female, every one will want to romance her, if your main Hawke is male, everyone will want to romance him. The NPCs are Hawke-sexual (thanks to a bioware forumite for this definition), not bi, straight or gay.

[Baelyn]

snfonseka wrote...

The romances in Dragon Age 2 are for everyone, says the games lead writer, not just for the straight, male gamer.
Read the full article in here.

What I think what BW has done is totally dumb. They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters.  They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the characters' personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.  Well..., BW you have done the character development in your past games in great manner, so don't try to dumb down the character development now.

Actually if you would have paid attention, or read into it anymore, you would have seen that each character is not "bi" they are simply romanceable depending on your picked gender. I.E. If you made a female Hawke, Anders is straight, if you make a male Hawke, hes gay. 

[Hatchetman77]

I think some insight into sexuality and culture in this world is necessary. My issue isn't homophobia, it's just having every romancable character being bisexual is just lazy, especially when we see 99% of the NPCs in male/female relationships and we don't see homosexuality in everyday life in this world.  Is homosexuality accepted in this culture, tolerated but frowned upon, and how does this relate across cultures?  Do dwarves have the same views on sexuality as humans or elves?  What is the chantry views on sexuality?  Does a religious person have a different view of homosexuality in this world?

Throughout history views towards sexuality has changed.  In Ancient Greece for example, it was ok for two men to have sex, but it was frowned upon if one male was seen as submissive in the relationship (they both had to be aggressive manly men for the relationship to be ok).  If BioWare is going to keep putting homosexuality in this world we need some kind of reference of what it means to be homosexual in this world.  You don't just put it in the game to get points for being "progressive", you should put it in to say something about your world.  

Modifié par Hatchetman77, 25 mars 2011 - 05:16 .

[Drake Sigar]

Well at least we know whose side the article writer’s on with the straight up accusation of homophobia in the title.

I strongly believe that sexuality should be unique to a character. Having interchangeable sexualities is pandering, it damages the believability of the characters, and worst of all it passes off sexual identity as no more integral to a character than hair colour. We want to treat everyone equally yes, but not at the expense of their very identity.

[Inquisitor Recon]

It's the Escapist. It's crap. The only good thing about them is the Aussie guy who does the reviews.

But yeah there is another topic about this filled with as much flamewar as you desire.

[Mooh Bear]

On this matter, it's damned if you do, damned if you don't. When Bioware limits romance options to certain characters/genders, people whine they can't romance their favorite one (Tali anyone?). When Bioware makes every character romanceable, people complain they don't want all that gayness/lesbianism around them. What gives? And to people up in arms at the thought that a homosexual may make a pass at them in a video game, I'd suggest a little introspection about why it bothers them. Frankly, it says more about their insecurities than about Bioware's intent.

Modifié par Mooh Bear, 24 mars 2011 - 07:34 .

[bill4747bill]

Every charcater is not bi.

Your choices as a player set the preferences of the companion.

They are offering you multiple versions of the companion.

It is more practical than having 30 companions.

[v_ware]

snfonseka wrote...

The romances in Dragon Age 2 are for everyone, says the games lead writer, not just for the straight, male gamer.

Did you read it? You're twisting his words.

ANOTHER MASSIVE SIGH.

[mattydef]

I dont mind having gay/bi characters, but what does annoy me is when I played I got aggressively hit on by males when I made no attempts at all, but any of the females I had to actively pursue and get shut down. Even when isabella invites me to go back to her room, I go to the inn to talk to her and my hawke rejects buying her drinks without any choice!!

[CRISIS1717]

I didn't see his post as homophobic at all, in the past Bioware catered specifically in DA2 they just simply made everyone bisexual. He's certainly entitled to state his opinion and yes it probably would make more sense to limit sexual preferences of a character to their characterisation but it just means now we won't have anyone complaining there isn't a romance for them in the game.

[addiction21]

They tried that way OP and people ****ed that characters they want to be gay or bit or whatever were not.

Please let us know this happy middle ground...

[CRISIS1717]

Filament wrote...

We don't really need two threads discussing the same topic, do we?

edit: orrrr the other one could just get locked.

I just posted in this one because OP was sensationalist and wrong, there is nothing homophobic about this at all.

[The Angry One]

This is a repeat topic and will probably be locked since the other one was.
I will not get into this again. I will simply ask one simple question: Why is Merril straight? Why assume this unless you are prejudiced?

[Inquisitor Recon]

CRISIS1717 wrote...
I just posted in this one because OP was sensationalist and wrong, there is nothing homophobic about this at all.

The Escapist is a bunch of wine sipping holier-than-thou snobs to begin with, so naturally they wouldn't miss out on a chance like this. They're the New Yorker of the gaming world.

[Anarya]

snfonseka wrote...

The romances in Dragon Age 2 are for everyone, says the games lead writer, not just for the straight, male gamer.
Read the full article in here.

What I think what BW has done is totally dumb. They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters.  They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the characters' personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.  Well..., BW you have done the character development in your past games in great manner, so don't try to dumb down the character development now.

Why is opening up that content to everyone "dumb"? It's a tradeoff. Either you use sexuality as a bigger part of characterization and close off content to minority orientations or you open that content up to everyone and make the characters' sexuality ambiguous. I think the tradeoff is worth it, and the dev team must have felt the same.

[Galad22]

This is such a silly thing to complain about. There are much bigger flaws in the game.

I do agree that Anders should have been written as bi, if as some say he is straight when you play fem Hawke and gay with male Hawke. But othervise why does this matter?

[Niblik12]

There are already a number of threads on this exact same subject.

I vote for a lock and a pointer to the other, older threads.

[Inquisitor Recon]

Ms. Lovey Dovey wrote...
When it comes down to it......anyone who wants a "No homosexual" option is straight up homophobic. End of
question.

Tell me, if you want the option of these "Hawke-sexuals" who swing whatever way Hawke swings, why would it be wrong for a "no homosexual" option at the start of the game?

[truestatic]

I felt a great disturbance in the Forum… as if millions of trolls suddenly cried out in bigotry and were suddenly silenced. But seriously, this is locked in t minus 5.

That said, I see what the OP's saying, and I don't disagree. In fact, this is my exact viewpoint as well, but I see the problems with it. In order to have some straight, some gay, and some bi characters, you would either need to have an enormous cast of characters which you probably wouldn't get to explore very much, or you'd have one character of each gender and sexual persuasion combination for each game, which would get dreadfully formulaic and boring. Bioware probably made the right call sticking to what they did.

[The Angry One]

ReconTeam wrote...

Ms. Lovey Dovey wrote...
When it comes down to it......anyone who wants a "No homosexual" option is straight up homophobic. End of
question.

Tell me, if you want the option of these "Hawke-sexuals" who swing whatever way Hawke swings, why would it be wrong for a "no homosexual" option at the start of the game?

Because you can avoid it in game. Say no. Romance over. Move on. The end.
You simply have a problem with the idea that your companions are bi.