Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age 2 Lead Writer Blasts Homophobic Fan


2875 réponses à ce sujet

#1151
Frybread76

Frybread76
  • Members
  • 816 messages

Baelyn wrote...

snfonseka wrote...

The romances in Dragon Age 2 are for everyone, says the games lead writer, not just for the straight, male gamer.
Read the full article in here.

What I think what BW has done is totally dumb. They should have introduced some characters as straight, some as bi and some as gay. It is more realistic than turning all the romance-companions into bi characters.  They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the characters' personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.  Well..., BW you have done the character development in your past games in great manner, so don't try to dumb down the character development now.


Actually if you would have paid attention, or read into it anymore, you would have seen that each character is not "bi" they are simply romanceable depending on your picked gender. I.E. If you made a female Hawke, Anders is straight, if you make a male Hawke, hes gay. 


You're not entirely correct.  Lore wise, I would say Isabella and (maybe) Anders are bisexual.  The others are Hawke-sexual.

#1152
dirftglass

dirftglass
  • Members
  • 210 messages

TheBroodfather wrote...

You can defend incest with all the arguments people use to defend homosexuality.



Defense of Homosexuality:

It does not produce children with horrible genetic defects due to recessive genes being paired, and it has
no natural connotation with abuse of parental trust in order to gain sexual gratification.

Please try to defend incest with this argument.

/rolleyes ... ignorant posters.

This reminds me of a debate I had with a religious person once who basically made the argument "If homosexuality, then why not bestiality".

I had to actually describe WHY bestiality was immoral, not just because it was gross, but because it was creature rape. In essence, this person had never thought WHY what they thought was wrong was wrong, they just knew they were taught it was and were repulsed by it.

Modifié par dirftglass, 25 mars 2011 - 03:49 .


#1153
ToJKa1

ToJKa1
  • Members
  • 1 246 messages

Russalka wrote...

TheBroodfather wrote...

The Hawke-sexual thing is stupid. It's just a ploy to get money from the non-straight crowd. Why didn't they make the siblings romance options? Since option's is what it's all about, why the hell not? Because there's no money in it. You can defend incest with all the arguments people use to defend homosexuality. They're consenting adults, they love each other, they were born that way, etc. But incest is frowned upon and uncommon, nonetheless. I guess this means Bioware is incest-phobes. Bioware needs to stop pandering. I don't know how it is with everyone else, but in real life I can't just take any person I hang out with regularly to bed just by selecting the dialogue option with the heart picture beside it. Odds are, Hawke would run into at least one person of the same sex who was heterosexual, or a person of the opposite sex who just plain wasn't into him/her.


Homosexuality is a sexual orientation, while incest is not. Apples and oranges.


I'm surprised it took 46 pages for that argument to appear. Not long now before someone compares homosexuality to zoophilia :lol:

As for my opinion, as a straight man that plays with female characters, all accidents are happy ones ;)

#1154
TheBroodfather

TheBroodfather
  • Members
  • 17 messages
Alright almost all, sorry lol. I came off as homophobic and that wasn't the intent. The point I was trying to make was that Bioware took it too far by making every single companion a romance option.

#1155
dirftglass

dirftglass
  • Members
  • 210 messages

TheBroodfather wrote...

Alright almost all, sorry lol. I came off as homophobic and that wasn't the intent. The point I was trying to make was that Bioware took it too far by making every single companion a romance option.


Ts'ok, as long as you also forgive and understand the tone of everyone's responses.

And anyways, yes, I would have liked it if they weren't all that way, just to make the "landscape of character interactions" a bit more diverse, but it doesn't really bother me.

If Bioware wants the options of players interested in gay romance to equal those of players interested in straight romance, then I'm fine with it.

#1156
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages

TheBroodfather wrote...

Alright almost all, sorry lol. I came off as homophobic and that wasn't the intent. The point I was trying to make was that Bioware took it too far by making every single companion a romance option.


That is what I argued when this topic came up, actually. Not the incest part, mind you.
I was worried that this might lessen the quality of the story, make it seem like a business choice.

However, judging from the backgrounds and storylines of all the companions, for as much as I have played, I was positively surprised. It may have had its roots in some tokenism, but this, overall, is still a positive message for the whole industry. The plot is good, and works with every romantic preference.

But that is my opinion.

#1157
Teddie Sage

Teddie Sage
  • Members
  • 6 754 messages
...

Edit: Please, could someone delete this post? Thanks.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 25 mars 2011 - 03:56 .


#1158
TheBroodfather

TheBroodfather
  • Members
  • 17 messages
Yeah that was a bad argument. I should probably edit that out because it takes the focus away from the point of the post.

Edit: There, 'tis fixed. :) I can see why people might get grumpy about that. I was kinda steamed from reading 46 pages of dead horseness so I spoke without thinking it through fully lol.

Modifié par TheBroodfather, 25 mars 2011 - 03:58 .


#1159
catabuca

catabuca
  • Members
  • 3 229 messages
Sometimes the simplest thing is the most important:

The way BW have designed the romances in this game gives the maximum amount of choice to the maximum amount of players. More people have a chance to experience more content than in previous games, and there is an attempt to provide something for everyone without breaking the bank for what is, after all, optional content.

Everybody wins (apart from those who want to be the only ones who get what they want to the exclusion of others).

And, not that I'm sure it matters as much as we perhaps make out on BSN, but for every person who cries foul and claims they'll never buy another BW game again, there will be another who will embrace the company and promise to support them in the future. Count me among the latter.

#1160
Scnew

Scnew
  • Members
  • 110 messages
I have no problem at all with including homosexual options in these games. I don't like the idea of any and every character being interested in whatever sex you happen to be, though. Zhevran and Leliana and Liara going both ways in DA:O and ME1 was fine because it was actually a part of their character. Liara because it's an asari thing, Leliana because of her history with Marjolaine, and Zhevran because... uh, because he's pretty much a ****.

But in DA2 it's just a convenient slight re-writing of the character based on your choice at the beginning. Fenris isn't interested in me because of his back story, he's interested in me just because I happen to be the PC. Hell, with Anders they even change his relationship with someone else based on your sex. If you want characters to be bisexual, that's perfectly fine, but then WRITE THEM AS BISEXUALS. Don't just force them to be arbitrarily interested in whatever particular set of junk Hawke happened to be born with. Isabela is the only one who doesn't bother me because we already knew she'd do most anyone from the first game.

#1161
Maugrim

Maugrim
  • Members
  • 3 639 messages

Scnew wrote...
Hell, with Anders they even change his relationship with someone else based on your sex. If you want characters to be bisexual, that's perfectly fine, but then WRITE THEM AS BISEXUALS. Don't just force them to be arbitrarily interested in whatever particular set of junk Hawke happened to be born with. 


Sorry either you've come to the wrong conclusion on your own or you've been misinformed.  They are all bisexual and always have been proof by  Word of Gaider

#1162
JediMB

JediMB
  • Members
  • 695 messages

catabuca wrote...

I expect this will be something that will continue to be improved upon in future games from both franchises. I far prefer the wheel to the lines of dialogue from DAO, and I far prefer DA2's wheel with its icons to ME's wheel. And sometimes there were more than 3 choices, for example when there was a 'special' (star) option available on the left. They have to find a balance between keeping the choices relatively simple (to both avoid clutter and avoid wildly deviating and branching stories that would be difficult to scrip in one game) and providing some sort of choice to the player. They're moving in the right direction, and I think we'd all do well to remember these things evolve over time and we can't expect everything to be the pinnacle of perfection in every game. They experiment, try things out, and that should be supported.


I agree fully, and every time a 'special' option has appeared, but it from information previously gained or the ability to invite a companion into the conversation, I have been absolutely delighted.

What I meant with having four options rather than three by default (while still keeping the system open to fewer or additional options if that is what the situation demands), is that it would do something about the mentality that you need one positive response, one neutral response and one negative response.

One way to utilize this modified system would be to give more nuanced options as the situations require (diplomatic/witty/wise/aggressive at one point, diplomatic/witty/decisive/aggressive at another, etc.), or to simply let the fourth option expand on what the game has recorded as the player character's preferred mindset. (So, if the witty options are what you'll usually go for, you'll have an extra option of that kind, which encourages players to assume different personas for different playthroughs.)


catabuca wrote...

The subject of Anders and that one solitary conversation with the 2 hearts and the 1 broken heart is a bit of a strawman. It's being used by some as a reason to say there shouldn't be bisexual characters in the game, and not as a way to merely talk about the way the friendship/rivalry system works, or the way the dialogue wheel works. If there had been a neutral option I suspect something else would have reared its ugly head as the evil spectre of gayness to complain about. As many have pointed out, nobody seems to be complaining with as much vigour about a female Hawke who accrues the same rivalry points for clicking the broken heart. This is about not wanting to see a gay character, pure and simple.


This is true.


catabuca wrote...

Incidentally, or not, I am currently playing as a male Hawke, and during that conversation I picked the 'It's unexpected' heart line, with no intention of romancing Anders in the game. I'm now in act 3, and Anders hasn't made one single solitary move on Hawke since that conversation, and I've not once had to click a broken heart. I had max'd out friendship by the end of act 1 (which is incredibly easy to do with Anders - even with the extra 15 rivalry hit if you'd picked the broken heart in fact), and his relationship is playing out as I'd expect - we're friends, nothing more. The line Hawke actually says when you click the 'It's unexpected' heart is "It doesn't mean I want you to stop". A player can read this in two ways: it could mean Hawke is interested in Anders; or it could mean Hawke likes knowing people find him attractive, but isn't particularly attracted to Anders either way. If you use your imagination (which is what you're encouraged to do in a roleplaying game) you can align that line with a gay Hawke or a straight Hawke. You just have to get over yourself.


I'm playing female Hawke, myself, and I initially picked the "It's unexpected" line, and was alright with that as it I just didn't want to get those rivalry points with Anders.

An hour or two of game time later, though, I started thinking about what Anders had told me. While I don't like how insensitive Hawke's romance-breaking line was, I realized that I really should have chosen it, rivalry points be damned. Anders had told me that I (Hawke) reminded him of the Warden, and that I seemed to him like the sort of person who would always tell him the truth, even if he wouldn't like it.

I was never really afraid of romancing Anders, and have plans to actually do so in the future, but I realized that leading him on felt like a betrayal, even if it wasn't going to go anywhere. I suppose it's because I've been on the other end of such an act in real life. So, yes, long story short... I reloaded an earlier save, lost a few hours of progress, and did the right thing with Anders, accepting that my Hawke would simply have to be uncomfortable with someone having unreciprocated romantic feelings for her.

#1163
JediMB

JediMB
  • Members
  • 695 messages

Scnew wrote...

Hell, with Anders they even change his relationship with someone else based on your sex.


Actually, I think it's just part of his character that he doesn't want a female Hawke to know that he's attracted to men as well, since he is interested in her now. Otherwise he'd have to explain to her that he likes women too, to avoid confusion.

With male Hawke, however, he uses his past relationship to make it known that he might be interested in Hawke.

#1164
Tommy6860

Tommy6860
  • Members
  • 2 488 messages

moilami wrote...

Tommy6860 wrote...

moilami wrote...

Artoz96 wrote...

JediMB wrote...

Artoz96 wrote...

You like all being bi? Ok. But I want a good fantasy game. I dont want to think that this guy that covers me is gay. I cant feel like he is my close friend or brother in arms becouse of he is gay and may think that I am found of him.

I dont against gay characters, it was ok with Zevran cause I could easely avoid him. But in DA2 the only 2h warrior is Fenris and the only healer is Anders.

And you are right we dont have choise in our feelings and that is why I dont want gay to hit on me.


what is this i dont even

I'm sorry to have to break this to you, but this is homophobia and prejudice.

Otherwise, you'd have to be uncomfortable with being around female characters that you aren't interested in either, since one apparently can't be a "close friend or sister in arms" if she might possibly have feelings for you.


No need to sorry, If I need to fu... with gay so that you consider me tolerate person, than no, I am a homophob. By the way, tell me please, doctor, what is it "homophobia"? Not long ago thougnt that gay person is sick.  Now nobody think so. Now we have another situation when the person that dont like gays is sick.  Dont you thing it quite... wrong?

Tell me doc, so i dont like gays and dont want them to deal with me... what harm i dealt to them by this? How I insult gay person? :o



Exactly. This whole thing is so sick and absurd I don't remember seeing anything comparable.

People say you have to be fine with gays advancing on you and trying to use your exit only tube, else you are being yelled hard of being a homophobic. So you have to prove you are not a homophobic by letting people hit you at will and use your exit only tube.

If you want to say to those people "get lost scum" one person here begun to have fantasies how he would kill you if you would do it again when asked to not do it again.

WTF?


It seems you are mixing political correctness with simple human nature. You tend to harp on having to be PC as to demonize the nature of it all. Yet while I hang out with some of my male friends and they make unruly gestures at their female counterparts, yet somehow that can be overlooked; Oh the irony of it all.


I have heard it is not being overlooked by women. I have heard they can find it very offensive and disturbing. But I have heard also that some women enjoy if they get attention from males.

However, in any case I haven't yelled to any women they are heterophobic or manphobic if they don't enjoy of the unwanted attention they get. I can't even imagine that happening from my side.

It seems you don't understand anything.


I understand this just fine, what I don't understand is homophobia. Your using a female example of repulsion isn't justifying homophobia. I have no problem with someone being uncomfortable in situations that can be *unfamiliar* to them. But it is totally another to make a case saying that is shouldn't happen as being forced down their thoats from one angle of orientation. You have simple choice to say or act as your orientation dictates, but not demand that it can, or should never happen because of an orientation. In any event where someone is met with sexual advances and they are to be offended, the feeling of offense should be the fact that it is a sexual advance and not that it is due to one out of bias against one's orientation.

Modifié par Tommy6860, 25 mars 2011 - 04:32 .


#1165
TheBroodfather

TheBroodfather
  • Members
  • 17 messages

makenzieshepard wrote...

Scnew wrote...
Hell, with Anders they even change his relationship with someone else based on your sex. If you want characters to be bisexual, that's perfectly fine, but then WRITE THEM AS BISEXUALS. Don't just force them to be arbitrarily interested in whatever particular set of junk Hawke happened to be born with. 


Sorry either you've come to the wrong conclusion on your own or you've been misinformed.  They are all bisexual and always have been proof by  Word of Gaider




That's still poor writing. It doesn't makes sense that everyone Hawke bumps into happens to be bisexual. They just wanted to please everyone. If you watch Spider-Man 3 (or read this thread) you know that's already been proven impossible.

#1166
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

catabuca wrote...

Sometimes the simplest thing is the most important:

The way BW have designed the romances in this game gives the maximum amount of choice to the maximum amount of players. More people have a chance to experience more content than in previous games, and there is an attempt to provide something for everyone without breaking the bank for what is, after all, optional content.

Everybody wins (apart from those who want to be the only ones who get what they want to the exclusion of others).

And, not that I'm sure it matters as much as we perhaps make out on BSN, but for every person who cries foul and claims they'll never buy another BW game again, there will be another who will embrace the company and promise to support them in the future. Count me among the latter.


<3

#1167
FellowerOfOdin

FellowerOfOdin
  • Members
  • 1 326 messages

dirftglass wrote...

TheBroodfather wrote...

You can defend incest with all the arguments people use to defend homosexuality.



Defense of Homosexuality:

It does not produce children with horrible genetic defects due to recessive genes being paired, and it has
no natural connotation with abuse of parental trust in order to gain sexual gratification.

Please try to defend incest with this argument.



You did not get the point. Do you have sex with a partner of the same gender for reproduction purposes? 

That was his point. You can also have sex with your sister without getting her pregnat and your argument becomes useless.

So...please think twice about an argument before presenting it.

#1168
JediMB

JediMB
  • Members
  • 695 messages

TheBroodfather wrote...

makenzieshepard wrote...

Scnew wrote...
Hell, with Anders they even change his relationship with someone else based on your sex. If you want characters to be bisexual, that's perfectly fine, but then WRITE THEM AS BISEXUALS. Don't just force them to be arbitrarily interested in whatever particular set of junk Hawke happened to be born with. 


Sorry either you've come to the wrong conclusion on your own or you've been misinformed.  They are all bisexual and always have been proof by  Word of Gaider




That's still poor writing. It doesn't makes sense that everyone Hawke bumps into happens to be bisexual. They just wanted to please everyone. If you watch Spider-Man 3 (or read this thread) you know that's already been proven impossible.


It's improbable if we use our world as a frame of reference, but there's no reason to conclude that it doesn't make sense.

Plus, Aveline, Bethany and Carver seem to be straight.

#1169
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

FellowerOfOdin wrote...

dirftglass wrote...

TheBroodfather wrote...

You can defend incest with all the arguments people use to defend homosexuality.



Defense of Homosexuality:

It does not produce children with horrible genetic defects due to recessive genes being paired, and it has
no natural connotation with abuse of parental trust in order to gain sexual gratification.

Please try to defend incest with this argument.



You did not get the point. Do you have sex with a partner of the same gender for reproduction purposes? 

That was his point. You can also have sex with your sister without getting her pregnat and your argument becomes useless.

So...please think twice about an argument before presenting it.

The sad part is that I actually defend both, but don't expect you to have said that in a way that means you're equally tolerant.

#1170
Lord Sullivan

Lord Sullivan
  • Members
  • 560 messages

dirftglass wrote...

Defense of Homosexuality:

It does not produce children with horrible genetic defects due to recessive genes being paired, and it has
no natural connotation with abuse of parental trust in order to gain sexual gratification.


That is actualy false as we are all children of insest... from far in the geological tree sure but we are none
the less. This is fear mongering to protect the moral of it and control the masses.

#1171
JediMB

JediMB
  • Members
  • 695 messages

FellowerOfOdin wrote...

dirftglass wrote...

TheBroodfather wrote...

You can defend incest with all the arguments people use to defend homosexuality.



Defense of Homosexuality:

It does not produce children with horrible genetic defects due to recessive genes being paired, and it has
no natural connotation with abuse of parental trust in order to gain sexual gratification.

Please try to defend incest with this argument.



You did not get the point. Do you have sex with a partner of the same gender for reproduction purposes? 

That was his point. You can also have sex with your sister without getting her pregnat and your argument becomes useless.

So...please think twice about an argument before presenting it.


Personally I would not condemn two adult siblings if they engaged in a sexual relationship with mutual consent, as long as they made sure to protect themselves against pregnancies. It should be their choice, and I don't have any right to stop them because I find it "icky".

I would also like people with inheritable diseases or genetic disorders (which are the only real dangers of incest) to take the same precautions, but we don't seem to have any laws there...

Modifié par JediMB, 25 mars 2011 - 05:28 .


#1172
catabuca

catabuca
  • Members
  • 3 229 messages

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

catabuca wrote...

Sometimes the simplest thing is the most important:

The way BW have designed the romances in this game gives the maximum amount of choice to the maximum amount of players. More people have a chance to experience more content than in previous games, and there is an attempt to provide something for everyone without breaking the bank for what is, after all, optional content.

Everybody wins (apart from those who want to be the only ones who get what they want to the exclusion of others).

And, not that I'm sure it matters as much as we perhaps make out on BSN, but for every person who cries foul and claims they'll never buy another BW game again, there will be another who will embrace the company and promise to support them in the future. Count me among the latter.


<3


Don't make me lick you again.

JediMB wrote ...

Plus, Aveline, Bethany and Carver seem to be straight.


Oh honey, Carver is totally in love with Fenris ... everyone knows that ;)

#1173
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages

Lord Sullivan wrote...

That is actualy false as we are all children of insest... from far in the geological tree sure but we are none
the less. This is fear mongering to protect the moral of it and control the masses.


It still is not a sexual orientation.

#1174
Lord Sullivan

Lord Sullivan
  • Members
  • 560 messages

Russalka wrote...

Lord Sullivan wrote...

That is actualy false as we are all children of insest... from far in the geological tree sure but we are none
the less. This is fear mongering to protect the moral of it and control the masses.


It still is not a sexual orientation.


I'm not claiming it is, but I needed to correct that falacy.

#1175
FellowerOfOdin

FellowerOfOdin
  • Members
  • 1 326 messages
I'm just honest, that's all. I am a very conservative person and I'm not afraid of sharing a honest opinion like a lot of others.

Incest is a no-go for any purposes, even if you do not want to reproduce yourself...it's just disgusting and it would make you care less for actually finding a real partner thus it is contra-productive too.

Homosexuality is another case and has nothing to do with incest. It's not a crime to begin with, it's a decision someone has to make during his life. You do not need to respect that person for such a decision, but you must also realize that he is on legal ground and there's no reason why he should not make such a decision...people make far worse decisions every day, so why judge someone by his sexual orientation alone?

I don't have a problem with f/f relationships, I am naturally attracted to women and thus I can also enjoy an attractive lesbian couple...no problem for me. m/m is another case though as it's not attractive to me...in the contrary.

Don't get me wrong, it's not like I hate someone just because he is gay, I do have two gay male friends, but I also know two other people who I convinced hitting on females again and both are pretty happy with that, one of them now has a 2 year old daughter and is married for 4 years now.

As stated above, I am conservative and against stuff like e.g. homosexual marriages because I think that marriage is a very special ceremony / privilege that should be restricted to the "natural" couple of man and woman, including stuff like lower taxes and sth. as such a relationship increases the nation's growth / genetic pool and should be preserved.

I am not homophobic though, 96% of the people here (including Bioware) use the term in the wrong way. Homophobic refers to irrational fear towards homosexual groups / individuals, but if someone has an aversion towards homosexual people because of e.g. religious belief, that person cannot be homophobic as it's not irrational.

So...if some people demand everyone to be open-minded about their stuff but react in an absolutey heterophobic way when responding to people with a different opinion...that's not more than hypocrisy.

Nobody needs to get along with each other, nobody needs to be good friends with another. You can simply not like someone because of his orientation, that's your choice, let it be good or bad, but you should not jump at the other's throat either.