Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age 2 Lead Writer Blasts Homophobic Fan


2875 réponses à ce sujet

#1201
Lord Sullivan

Lord Sullivan
  • Members
  • 560 messages

Russalka wrote...

FellowerOfOdin wrote...
Nature shows us the answer: if everyone was homosexual, we'd be extinct by now. And yes, debates with heterophobics are just as productive as debates between religious and non-religious people ;)


Everyone can't be homosexual. It is impossible. Heterosexuals will always outnumber homosexuals.

But using that "logic" to think of homosexuals as overall lesser is a fallacy.


I don't think anyone is saying that Gay peeps are lesser(If I got your meaning of lesser right) BUt I believe that
the Heteros are mostly trying to counter a dismissal based on the fact that we're the largest of both groups.

Modifié par Lord Sullivan, 25 mars 2011 - 06:05 .


#1202
ExtinctRPG

ExtinctRPG
  • Members
  • 65 messages
[Edit: Comment removed for an extreme violation of the Site Rules of Conduct. - Pacifien]

Modifié par Pacifien, 25 mars 2011 - 06:28 .


#1203
Aris_Khandr

Aris_Khandr
  • Members
  • 18 messages

snfonseka wrote...

They should have approached this sexuality issue in more creative manner, where the sexuality is part of the characters' personality. For example, Merrill is straight and Isabela is bi.


I said this to you over there, and I'll say it again.  Guys got Tali all to themselves in ME2, so you are NOT taking Merrill from us!

#1204
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

Lord Sullivan wrote...

Russalka wrote...

FellowerOfOdin wrote...
Nature shows us the answer: if everyone was homosexual, we'd be extinct by now. And yes, debates with heterophobics are just as productive as debates between religious and non-religious people ;)


Everyone can't be homosexual. It is impossible. Heterosexuals will always outnumber homosexuals.

But using that "logic" to think of homosexuals as overall lesser is a fallacy.


I don't think anyone is saying that Gay peeps are lesser(If I got your meaning of lesser right) BUt I believe that
the Heteros are mostly trying to counter a dismissal based on the fact that we're the largest of both groups.


I'm not entirely sure what you're saying, but what's going on is that most people here have been dismissing homosexuals and using the fact that heterosexuals are the majority to justify that. That the "majority" has somehow decided it's more fun to play the victim and claim that they're the ones being dismissed is silly.

#1205
FellowerOfOdin

FellowerOfOdin
  • Members
  • 1 326 messages
LeVay, Simon: Queer Science: The Use and Abuse of Research into Homosexuality

...among others.

Modifié par FellowerOfOdin, 25 mars 2011 - 06:09 .


#1206
Caralampio

Caralampio
  • Members
  • 372 messages
You know, Bastal's idea about a button, that gave rise to Gaider's caustic response, isn't that bad. Of course, the proposal of a "no homosexuality" button is too crude and could be considered offensive, but what if while creating your character there were options to tick: Romance preference: Hetero x Bi x Gay x. Then the game would leave out the conversational options that are not to your taste. Everyone can have fun in his/her own way. It would be like any other choice in the game that closes some conversation options and opens others.

#1207
Siansonea

Siansonea
  • Members
  • 7 282 messages

FellowerOfOdin wrote...

Russalka wrote...

How is that relevant at all? Homosexuality has been observed in many species.

How do animals choose?


Siansonea II wrote...

And yet homosexual behavior is observed in the animal kingdom, across a wide spectrum of species. Giraffes are especially known for it. Naturally, not all giraffes engage in exclusively homosexual behavior, so we still get baby giraffes.

By nature. While homosexuality does occur among animals, it only does when there are enough heterosexual animals around.


So you're an expert on this now? Cite your source for this sweeping statement, please.

#1208
Seifz

Seifz
  • Members
  • 1 215 messages

FellowerOfOdin wrote...

I'm just honest, that's all. I am a very conservative person and I'm not afraid of sharing a honest opinion like a lot of others.


And I hope you'll understand that everything I'm about to say is also my honest opinion, mixed in with a bit of fact.

Incest is a no-go for any purposes, even if you do not want to reproduce yourself...it's just disgusting and it would make you care less for actually finding a real partner thus it is contra-productive too.


You're judging other people, here.  It's not up to you what they deem moral and productive.  That said, it's quite well established that incestual pregnancies often lead to birth defects and retardation.  I have no problem with two consenting adults beginning an incestual relationship, but I do have a problem with allowing them to reproduce.  Punishing them for the second act would make the eventual baby's life even worse, so I don't know of a good solution to that problem.

Homosexuality is another case and has nothing to do with incest. It's not a crime to begin with, it's a decision someone has to make during his life. You do not need to respect that person for such a decision, but you must also realize that he is on legal ground and there's no reason why he should not make such a decision...people make far worse decisions every day, so why judge someone by his sexual orientation alone?


It's not a decision.  That isn't my opinion.  It's fact.  If you've been told otherwise, you were lied to.

That said, I would point out that religion is absolutely a choice and I'm often told that criticizing someone or not accepting them because of that choice is wrong.  So even if homosexuality was a choice, why wouldn't the same standards apply?

I don't have a problem with f/f relationships, I am naturally attracted to women and thus I can also enjoy an attractive lesbian couple...no problem for me. m/m is another case though as it's not attractive to me...in the contrary.


I think that two guys kissing is gross, too.  I don't like watching it.  But so what?  Why should my feelings of icky! get in the way of two men having a relationship?  That would be absurd.  I think that ugly people kissing is icky to watch, too.  Should we declare that ugly people cannot have relationships?

Don't get me wrong, it's not like I hate someone just because he is gay, I do have two gay male friends, but I also know two other people who I convinced hitting on females again and both are pretty happy with that, one of them now has a 2 year old daughter and is married for 4 years now.


Why do all homophobes always tell us that they have gay friends, as if that makes everything okay?  In any case, your friend is either bisexual, is pretending to be homosexual to fit in with society, or was never gay to begin with but wanted to experiment.  Again, homosexuality is not a choice any more than is skin color.

As stated above, I am conservative and against stuff like e.g. homosexual marriages because I think that marriage is a very special ceremony / privilege that should be restricted to the "natural" couple of man and woman, including stuff like lower taxes and sth. as such a relationship increases the nation's growth / genetic pool and should be preserved.


Homosexuality is natural.  In addition, all people should be treated equally.  Thus, there is no logical argument against gay marriage.  Though, the government really has no business being in the marriage game anyway.  If the government wants to give everyone equal civil union status, that's fine.  Leave the marriage to the religious folks.

I am not homophobic though, 96% of the people here (including Bioware) use the term in the wrong way. Homophobic refers to irrational fear towards homosexual groups / individuals, but if someone has an aversion towards homosexual people because of e.g. religious belief, that person cannot be homophobic as it's not irrational.


I would argue that the religion itself is irrational.  As I said earlier, religion is a choice.  You chose to follow whatever religion you follow and I don't accept it as a justification for bigotry.  What if I founded a religion that said black people were evil.  Would you defend my racism in court, too?  Would you declare that I am not a racist, that I am just following my religious beliefs?  Or would you rightly label me as a bigot?

So...if some people demand everyone to be open-minded about their stuff but react in an absolutey heterophobic way when responding to people with a different opinion...that's not more than hypocrisy.


I don't think that anyone is arguing against heterosexuality and heterosexual relationships.  People are arguing against homosexuality and homosexual relationships.  That's a big difference.  If you're creeped out by gay people, too bad.

Nobody needs to get along with each other, nobody needs to be good friends with another. You can simply not like someone because of his orientation, that's your choice, let it be good or bad, but you should not jump at the other's throat either.


I hope you see my dislike of religion in the same light.  :)

#1209
Guest_Ms. Lovey Dovey_*

Guest_Ms. Lovey Dovey_*
  • Guests

FellowerOfOdin wrote...

LeVay, Simon: Queer Science: The Use and Abuse of Research into Homosexuality

...among others.


Please let's not fake intelligence....

#1210
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages

FellowerOfOdin wrote...

LeVay, Simon: Queer Science: The Use and Abuse of Research into Homosexuality

...among others.


I thought LaVey only proved that the whole subject is ambiguous, that either side of the argument, choice or not a choice, has no substantial proof.

#1211
moilami

moilami
  • Members
  • 2 727 messages

JironGhrad wrote...

So how about we just call it phalluphobic then? Since most "homophobic" men aren't disgusted by lesbians...


dunno maybe u should just accept that ur not welcome to my bed

#1212
Aedan_Cousland

Aedan_Cousland
  • Members
  • 1 403 messages
I agree with the OP.

A better way to do it would have been to have characters with a set sexuality that was part of their character, not characters that change depending upon whether you play a male or female Hawke.

#1213
Siansonea

Siansonea
  • Members
  • 7 282 messages
Wow, the BS is really getting deep in here now. It cracks me up the lengths that homophobic people will go to in order to a) "prove" they're not homophobic while stating blatantly homophobic things and B) "prove" that homosexuality ain't natural, by God. Unfortunately, the only weapons to rebut such arguments involve logic and reason, which clearly don't enter into the homophobe's thought process at any point. I really do wonder why "straight" men would spend so much time and energy being irate about homosexuality, when ostensibly it is something that doesn't affect them in any way. And all this because Anders has the unmitigated nerve to ask ManHawke if he swings that way? Talk about disproportionate.

#1214
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages

moilami wrote...

dunno maybe u should just accept that ur not welcome to my bed


I thought you left.

I don't think anyone wanted to get into your bed. Again you assert this subject into the conversation.

#1215
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

Aedan_Cousland wrote...

I agree with the OP.

A better way to do it would have been to have characters with a set sexuality that was part of their character, not characters that change depending upon whether you play a male or female Hawke.


They did give all the LIs a set sexuality. They're all bi*.




*probably; they don't really talk about it, so it's ambiguous (heaven forbid they should have interests besides being gay/straight/bi!)

Modifié par ishmaeltheforsaken, 25 mars 2011 - 06:17 .


#1216
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 485 messages
The criticism here is that Bioware has reduced their romance options to meeting a sort of quota, rather than fully implementing them into the story. Some would say that makes them fan service. I've seen this coming for a long time myself, the seed of it was in ME1.

If you're going to include gay/bi people in your games, you should back it up with character development. I guarantee that would really freak people out: frank discussion of sexual orientation and gender in a video game. A whole lot of people aren't ready for that.

Modifié par slimgrin, 25 mars 2011 - 06:18 .


#1217
moilami

moilami
  • Members
  • 2 727 messages

Russalka wrote...

moilami wrote...

dunno maybe u should just accept that ur not welcome to my bed


I thought you left.

I don't think anyone wanted to get into your bed. Again you assert this subject into the conversation.


say that to anders and fenris too plz

#1218
ExtinctRPG

ExtinctRPG
  • Members
  • 65 messages
[Edit: Comment removed for an extreme violation of the Site Rules of Conduct. - Pacifien]

Modifié par Pacifien, 25 mars 2011 - 06:28 .


#1219
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages

moilami wrote...

say that to anders and fenris too plz


People flirt with each other all the time. And you do not have to flirt with Fenris.

#1220
Guest_Ms. Lovey Dovey_*

Guest_Ms. Lovey Dovey_*
  • Guests

slimgrin wrote...

The criticism here is that Bioware has reduced their romance options to meeting a sort of quota, rather than fully implementing them into the story. Some would say that makes them fan service. I've seen this coming for a long time myself, the seed of it was in ME1.

If you're going to include gay/bi people in your games, you should back it up with character development, but I guarantee that would really freak some people out: frank discussion of sexual orientation and gender in a video game. A whole lot of people aren't ready for that.


We'd still be having this argument even if BioWare made a fully gay character. Except a lot more insulting.

#1221
mesmerizedish

mesmerizedish
  • Members
  • 7 776 messages

slimgrin wrote...

The criticism here is that Bioware has reduced their romance options to meeting a sort of quota, rather than fully implementing them into the story. Some would say that makes them fan service. I've seen this coming for a long time myself, the seed of it was in ME1.

If you're going to include gay/bi people in your games, you should back it up with character development. I guarantee that would really freak some people out: frank discussion of sexual orientation and gender in a video game. A whole lot of people aren't ready for that.


They don't have to "back up" straight characters. Why are ******-/bi-sexuals so different*?




*protip: they're not

#1222
JironGhrad

JironGhrad
  • Members
  • 1 657 messages

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

I'm not entirely sure what you're saying, but what's going on is that most people here have been dismissing homosexuals and using the fact that heterosexuals are the majority to justify that. That the "majority" has somehow decided it's more fun to play the victim and claim that they're the ones being dismissed is silly.


I've been following (and commented a couple times) throughout the entire 49 pages. The vast majority of self-identifed straight people, who've responded, have all said they don't want the options removed from the game entirely. That's not dismissing anyone. The request for a preference toggle isn't "homophobic". If we have an option for "strictly-straight" there could (and I think should be) an option to also play "strictly-gay". All the majority has asked for is the option to "enjoy the game their way" . I think we can all reasonably agree that this an ideal option regardless of gender or sexual preference... yes?

The fact that the players (again, regardless of gender orientation) are being called intollerant and slapped with labels for wanting the option to play their way is, in fact, victimization. The fact that gender-preference lobbyists spend all that money trying to pressure that same majority to change all the laws completely fails to explain a key point. That point is that if it was a viable answer, "why hasn't it happened before in the last 3,000 years?" If it was openly practiced by Alexander the Great and his armies, and the Greeks, and the Romans... why didn't they have "equal-rights" built into their laws? Alexander ruled practically the entire known world in his day... he was too busy to sit down and write a little note? "Hey... gay guys can marry, have fun." Surely not...

#1223
Seifz

Seifz
  • Members
  • 1 215 messages

Ms. Lovey Dovey wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

The criticism here is that Bioware has reduced their romance options to meeting a sort of quota, rather than fully implementing them into the story. Some would say that makes them fan service. I've seen this coming for a long time myself, the seed of it was in ME1.

If you're going to include gay/bi people in your games, you should back it up with character development, but I guarantee that would really freak some people out: frank discussion of sexual orientation and gender in a video game. A whole lot of people aren't ready for that.


We'd still be having this argument even if BioWare made a fully gay character. Except a lot more insulting.


I'd like to point out that DG said they'd never have a strictly gay or lesbian character because not enough people would be into that.  So, it's pretty hard to argue that DA2's romance options were anything but fan service.

#1224
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 485 messages

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

slimgrin wrote...

The criticism here is that Bioware has reduced their romance options to meeting a sort of quota, rather than fully implementing them into the story. Some would say that makes them fan service. I've seen this coming for a long time myself, the seed of it was in ME1.

If you're going to include gay/bi people in your games, you should back it up with character development. I guarantee that would really freak some people out: frank discussion of sexual orientation and gender in a video game. A whole lot of people aren't ready for that.


They don't have to "back up" straight characters. Why are ******-/bi-sexuals so different*?




*protip: they're not


The reason is - and don't take this the wrong way - that's not the world we live in. Having half my team as switch-hitters doesn't seem realistic, it doesn't help character development.

#1225
Deified Data

Deified Data
  • Members
  • 269 messages
"The poster's attitude was rooted in a sense of privelege"...Oh, so true. Is this not 90% of this forum?

It's always funny to see the homophobes get their's.