2875 réponses à ce sujet

[sereture]

If you by natural mean "rational from a the-only-reason-for-existence-is-reproduction point of view", then I agree (Even if I find the use of the word wrong).

But again, why does it matter?

[Cadaveth]

sereture wrote...

If you by natural mean "rational from a the-only-reason-for-existence-is-reproduction point of view", then I agree (Even if I find the use of the word wrong).

But again, why does it matter?

Just because it matters!

oh, almost forgot [sarcasm]

[Lord Sullivan]

sereture wrote...

@ Lord Sullivan

I ask again:

Why is it even important whether or not homosexuality is "natural"?

It's important for Gays to accept that it isn't so that they can understand that when an heterosuexual have objections
to be subjected to Homosexuality they are not afraid of it nor discriminating and have a right to express it without
being tagged with some hyperbole word in the attempt to assasinate his/her character because gays don't want
to make an effort to understand that heterosexuals can't relate to homosexuality.

There was a time when there were queers, now there are homophobes?

This is not helping the Gay community, just sayin.

[sereture]

moilami wrote...

I highly recommend the Witcher (Directors Cut if you live in NA (North America) else you get sensored version). It is awesome game and I have already had one great sexual romance in it. There is more I hear.

Thank you.
I have been wanting to try that.

[Cadaveth]

Subjected to homosexuality... Someone is forcing straights to watch gay porn or what?

[Tirigon]

AngelicMachinery wrote...

If you just have sex for reproduction, your doing it wrong.

Christianity, Jewism and Islam disagree.

And they are hardly of the same opinion, so that´s special.

[Russalka]

Why is nothing else unnatural, but pretty normal in our day-to-day life met with the same aversion then? 

Might as well start hating condoms, medicines or computers, or anything else.

Modifié par Russalka, 27 mars 2011 - 10:30 .

[moilami]

Cadaveth wrote...

moilami wrote...
Oh, in Finland homosexuals can marry, but not in a church. They do it in one state department. Those who do not belong to church do it in the same department. Both groups then get benefits of marriage like they would had been married by church.

Nice to see another finn in here .

I'll take the "rekisteröity parisuhde" (don't know what that is in english...) over marriage in a church. I get the same benefits and stuff yet I don't have to associate with a religious institution which I don't even believe in.

I don't know official translations either.

The department is "civil registration office" by my computer level translation and rekisteröity parisuhde is "registrated relationship" or better translated "state approved and acknowledged relationship".

And yeah, nice to see a Finlander here. Have seen a few before you. Two of them thought they can yell me but learned quicly they can't xD Was funny.

[Tirigon]

centauri2002 wrote...

Saeran wrote...

I'm just going to throw this in here some where in this conversation and say.. Shooting fire from your hands is natural yo.

Thank goodness. I'd been thinking that all these years I was a freak. I'm so relieved.

Can you teach me?

It would help me impress the ladies.

Imagine the fun if one asks me "got light?" and points at her cigarette, and I´m like "as much as you want, babyB)" and produce a flame from the tip of my fingers.... None would resist me anymore:)

[Centauri2002]

Lord Sullivan wrote...


It's important for Gays to accept that it isn't so that they can understand that when an heterosuexual have objections
to be subjected to Homosexuality they are not afraid of it nor discriminating and have a right to express it without
being tagged with some hyperbole word in the attempt to assasinate his/her character because gays don't want
to make an effort to understand that heterosexuals can't relate to homosexuality.

There was a time when there were queers, now there are homophobes?

This is not helping the Gay community, just sayin.

So I hope you show your disapproval of infertile people when they're shoved in your face too then. 

Okay, I have a question for you, Sullivan: Why should us being 'unnatural' even make the slightest bit of difference to you? We're not preventing you from basking in your natural glory. You can go on and spread your seed however you want. Heck, there's even more potential mates out there for you because gay men are being considerate and leaving them for you. So, what gives you the right to spout this nonsense, exactly? What does it accomplish?

[Centauri2002]

Tirigon wrote...
Can you teach me?

It would help me impress the ladies.

Imagine the fun if one asks me "got light?" and points at her cigarette, and I´m like "as much as you want, babyB)" and produce a flame from the tip of my fingers.... None would resist me anymore:)

Oh, it requires years of intensive training, young padawan. Are you sure you have the dedication?

Hmm, now I have this rather nice image of Azula from Avatar in my mind because of this subject. >.>

[moilami]

Russalka wrote...

Why is nothing else unnatural, but pretty normal in our day-to-day life met with the same aversion then? 

Might as well start hating condoms, medicines or computers, or anything else.

I hate condoms.


Edit: But I recommend you of course use them. I don't myself use because I can restrict myself of doing casual sex with strangers and therefore am pretty safe of getting infested by some disease.

Modifié par moilami, 27 mars 2011 - 10:37 .

[sereture]

Lord Sullivan wrote...


It's important for Gays to accept that it isn't so that they can understand that when an heterosuexual have objections
to be subjected to Homosexuality they are not afraid of it nor discriminating and have a right to express it without
being tagged with some hyperbole word in the attempt to assasinate his/her character because gays don't want
to make an effort to understand that heterosexuals can't relate to homosexuality.

There was a time when there were queers, now there are homophobes?

This is not helping the Gay community, just sayin.

Can I ask you to write that some heterosexuals can't relate to homosexuality. ?
There have, after all been quite a few heterosexuals in here stating that they have no problem doing so.

But don't you agree that it is hypocritical to want gay men to ask about your sexuality before flirting, if you don't do the same before flirting with a girl?
Not everyone is good at reading other people.

Modifié par sereture, 27 mars 2011 - 10:34 .

[Cadaveth]

Russalka wrote...

Why is nothing else unnatural, but pretty normal in our day-to-day life met with the same aversion then? 

Might as well start hating condoms, medicines or computers, or anything else.

Kurat küll, estonians too. Both of my nationalities in the same thread, nice.

But yeah, usually people are afraid of new stuff... Like when black people were starting to fight against oppression etc.

[Tirigon]

centauri2002 wrote...
Heck, there's even more potential mates out there for you because gay men are being considerate and leaving them for you.

This is probably the most beautiful sentence I have ever read on this forum, and I´m leaving the sarcasm tag away on purpose.
I swear, i´d kiss you if you weren´t lesbian (and on the other side of the planet)<3

[Jademoon121]

Lord Sullivan wrote...

sereture wrote...

@ Lord Sullivan

I ask again:

Why is it even important whether or not homosexuality is "natural"?

It's important for Gays to accept that it isn't so that they can understand that when an heterosuexual have objections
to be subjected to Homosexuality they are not afraid of it nor discriminating and have a right to express it without
being tagged with some hyperbole word in the attempt to assasinate his/her character because gays don't want
to make an effort to understand that heterosexuals can't relate to homosexuality.

There was a time when there were queers, now there are homophobes?

This is not helping the Gay community, just sayin.

Homosexuality IS natural though. And whether if heterosexuals don't see me as natural or not is their issue, not mine.

[Russalka]

I am a half-breed Ingrian Finn, my ancestors were free farmers and wood elves near St Petersburg.

[Jademoon121]

Russalka wrote...

I am a half-breed Ingrian Finn, my ancestors were free farmers and wood elves near St Petersburg.

Cousin? 

[Centauri2002]

Tirigon wrote...

This is probably the most beautiful sentence I have ever read on this forum, and I´m leaving the sarcasm tag away on purpose.
I swear, i´d kiss you if you weren´t lesbian (and on the other side of the planet)<3

Ahaha, my girlfriend might also have something to say about that but the sentiment is appreciated nonetheless. 

[Cadaveth]

Jademoon121 wrote...

Russalka wrote...

I am a half-breed Ingrian Finn, my ancestors were free farmers and wood elves near St Petersburg.

Cousin? 

Sheesh, time to go sleeping I guess...

[Lord Sullivan]

Cadaveth wrote...

Subjected to homosexuality... Someone is forcing straights to watch gay porn or what?

If you want to play the word game then... If I'm having a conversation with a gay person, I'm not subjected to homosexuality, but a gay person makes a pass at me, I am subjected to homosexuality.

So if someone (i.e the subject user in the article)  experience is PC made a pass at in a game but a NPC of the same gender? he or she is subjected homosexuality OR Bi-sexuality.

So even if I support gays to the extent of my heterosexual limits? I cannot blame that person for complaining.

[Russalka]

So, you are saying it is not okay for homosexual people to flirt with heterosexual people because nature says so?

What happens when a heterosexual person flirts with a homosexual one?

Jademoon121 wrote...

Cousin? [smilie]../../../../images/forum/emoticons/blushing.png[/smilie]

Perhaps.

Modifié par Russalka, 27 mars 2011 - 10:42 .

[Jademoon121]

Lord Sullivan wrote...

Cadaveth wrote...

Subjected to homosexuality... Someone is forcing straights to watch gay porn or what?

If you want to play the word game then... If I'm having a conversation with a gay person, I'm not subjected to homosexuality, but a gay person makes a pass at me, I am subjected to homosexuality.

So if someone (i.e the subject user in the article)  experience is PC made a pass at in a game but a NPC of the same gender? he or she is subjected homosexuality OR Bi-sexuality.

So even if I support gays to the extent of my heterosexual limits? I cannot blame that person for complaining.

Gay people get hit on by straight people, a lot actually, but that's okay right? Their sensibilities and personal morals aren't a issue at all of course.

Modifié par Jademoon121, 27 mars 2011 - 10:44 .

[Lord Sullivan]

Jademoon121 wrote...

Lord Sullivan wrote...

sereture wrote...

@ Lord Sullivan

I ask again:

Why is it even important whether or not homosexuality is "natural"?

It's important for Gays to accept that it isn't so that they can understand that when an heterosuexual have objections
to be subjected to Homosexuality they are not afraid of it nor discriminating and have a right to express it without
being tagged with some hyperbole word in the attempt to assasinate his/her character because gays don't want
to make an effort to understand that heterosexuals can't relate to homosexuality.

There was a time when there were queers, now there are homophobes?

This is not helping the Gay community, just sayin.

Homosexuality IS natural though. And whether if heterosexuals don't see me as natural or not is their issue, not mine.

Then don't attact them for not agreeiong with you.

[Centauri2002]

Lord Sullivan wrote...

Then don't attact them for not agreeiong with you.

Don't disagree and you won't garner all this unwanted gay attention? ?