ZombifiedJake wrote...
Extremely disappointing.
here we go with the whining again. it was only a demo and 1 level
ZombifiedJake wrote...
Extremely disappointing.
Tazzmission wrote...
ZombifiedJake wrote...
Extremely disappointing.
here we go with the whining again. it was only a demo and 1 level
Modifié par ZombifiedJake, 24 mars 2011 - 08:23 .
thatbwoyblu wrote...
Dang this DLC is gonna be hot trash.
Orkboy wrote...
Soooo. How can it be classed as bridging DLC if you can do it before the suicide mission?
MrCry0 wrote...
Hmm, spoilers arent that big, really. and they only talk abotu one fifth. and no real specifics, other then that there will be no VS ( in mission 1).
Im cautiously anxious, lets just keep it at that.
I read the first paragraph of Page #2 and I don't see any retcons? If it's not in the first paragraph, then don't tell me what it is, as I'm avoiding heavy spoilers.Remus Artega wrote...
hm after reading a first few words on page two I smell a big backlash...seriously Mac??? you can't come up with anything original without retconing?
Fiery Phoenix wrote...
I read the first paragraph of Page #2 and I don't see any retcons? If it's not in the first paragraph, then don't tell me what it is, as I'm avoiding heavy spoilers.Remus Artega wrote...
hm after reading a first few words on page two I smell a big backlash...seriously Mac??? you can't come up with anything original without retconing?
Modifié par Ty2011, 24 mars 2011 - 08:26 .
Abstract wrote...
Hey guys, here's an interesting concept, not giving fanservice 24/7, the VS not being in it isn't a huge deal. They will be in ME3, if Bioware was that predictable it would be embarrassing.
I am quite excited for this.
Modifié par Tazzmission, 24 mars 2011 - 08:26 .
Raging about planning to send the asteroid to the Mass Relay, even though they are pretty much indestructible, according to Benezia . Notice how the reporter never got to that actual part, so they might be wrong, or how it may be used to block the path, like CDN hints as doing. Anyway, I think that it's a good question to ask to Mac.Fiery Phoenix wrote...
I read the first paragraph of Page #2 and I don't see any retcons? If it's not in the first paragraph, then don't tell me what it is, as I'm avoiding heavy spoilers.
Modifié par Phaedon, 24 mars 2011 - 08:28 .
Ty2011 wrote...
Just because they allow you to play it before the suicide mission doesn't mean that the story is set before it, timeline wise. If it was after the Suicide Mission nobody would buy it. It would be limited DLC available to a select few. I'm sure everyone here has a completed game save but they aren't just marketing it to the super fans but the casual gamers too. People shouldn't look too deep into it and it really isn't a big deal. Just enjoy it and don't complain or don't buy it at all.
Ty2011 wrote...
Just because they allow you to play it before the suicide mission doesn't mean that the story is set before it, timeline wise. If it was after the Suicide Mission nobody would buy it. It would be limited DLC available to a select few. I'm sure everyone here has a completed game save but they aren't just marketing it to the super fans but the casual gamers too. People shouldn't look too deep into it and it really isn't a big deal. Just enjoy it and don't complain or don't buy it at all.
Phaedon wrote...
Raging about planning to send the asteroid to the Mass Relay, even though they are pretty much indestructible, according to Benezia . Notice how the reporter never got to that actual part, so they might be wrong, or how it may be used to block the path, like CDN hints as doing. Anyway, I think that it's a good question to ask to Mac.Fiery Phoenix wrote...
I read the first paragraph of Page #2 and I don't see any retcons? If it's not in the first paragraph, then don't tell me what it is, as I'm avoiding heavy spoilers.
LordAnguis wrote...
The spoilers were only for the first of five missions. And I read the second page; it was a very brief overview of everything that happens. The only time I consider something a 'major spoiler' is if its a blow-by-blow account.
I also agree that Arrival should be played after SM. Especially if the ending has to do with informing the Council of the Reapers existence. Oh, yeah, that's good. You inform the Council, but you still have to work for Cerberus until after SM. Yeah, not going to happen. (If they have that option in this DLC, anyways). Truthfully, I'd only want to have to deal with the Council to rub the facts into the Turian Councilor's face. I don't like him.
Anyways, we have forty minutes before the interview with the Lead Writer. I'm going to watch.
Modifié par Blacklash93, 24 mars 2011 - 08:36 .