180 réponses à ce sujet

[Tazzmission]

Blacklash93 wrote...

How can you destroy a Mass Relay with an asteroid or an explosion?

They can come out of supernovas without a scratch!

remember bring down the sky? i question if its gona be like that when it involves the relay. my other question is do you get to see the guy you let go from bdts?

Modifié par Tazzmission, 24 mars 2011 - 08:35 .

[thatbwoyblu]

Just face it Ashley/Kaidan ain't gonna be ME 3.Bioware can care less about them 2. Bet they kill off your surviving vs. in the beginning of ME 3. Put your money up up if you actually think VS. aint on Biowares "I Forgot" list.

[Darth Death]

Very interesting indeed. Some questions were answered, but left me asking more in the end.

[Tazzmission]

thatbwoyblu wrote...

Just face it Ashley/Kaidan ain't gonna be ME 3.Bioware can care less about them 2. Bet they kill off your surviving vs. in the beginning of ME 3. Put your money up up if you actually think VS. aint on Biowares "I Forgot" list.

i found ash and kaiden annoying honestly.

[ArcanistLibram]

This thread is turning out worse than a "Star Destroyer vs the USS Enterprise NCC-1701D" debate.

[I...AM...KROGAN]

I read the second page, and I agree that the spoilers aren't major. However, others might disagree.

That being said, I'm a tad confused about what was revealed. A certain someone (actually, multiple someones) becomes indoctrinated once near a certain artifact... and yet that person was perfectly normal before? I thought indoctrination took place over time and slowly manifested itself. And I was under the impression that once it took hold, being near the source (i.e. reapers, etc.) had no bearing on the victim's state of mind. Why would an indoctrinated individual fully reveal their goals to the enemy? If the person is under the influence of reapers, I seriously doubt they'd spout the reapers' plans. Unless we're supposed to believe this was some sort of Benezia type mind "reserve." I really hope IGN's preview is quite an abridged account.

[Tazzmission]

I...AM...KROGAN wrote...

I read the second page, and I agree that the spoilers aren't major. However, others might disagree.

That being said, I'm a tad confused about what was revealed. A certain someone (actually, multiple someones) becomes indoctrinated once near a certain artifact... and yet that person was perfectly normal before? I thought indoctrination took place over time and slowly manifested itself. And I was under the impression that once it took hold, being near the source (i.e. reapers, etc.) had no bearing on the victim's state of mind. Why would an indoctrinated individual fully reveal their goals to the enemy? If the person is under the influence of reapers, I seriously doubt they'd spout the reapers' plans. Unless we're supposed to believe this was some sort of Benezia type mind "reserve." I really hope IGN's preview is quite an abridged account.

well look at saren. whats the year gap when he got indoctrinated between the novel and the first game? also for all we know the person in the new dlc couldve had that artifact longer before it became public knowledge

[samuraix87]

didnt the cdn enties say she has been missing for weeks or something and what about the cerberus team on the reaper how long were they their

[Tasker]

I...AM...KROGAN wrote...

I read the second page, and I agree that the spoilers aren't major. However, others might disagree.

That being said, I'm a tad confused about what was revealed. A certain someone (actually, multiple someones) becomes indoctrinated once near a certain artifact... and yet that person was perfectly normal before? I thought indoctrination took place over time and slowly manifested itself. And I was under the impression that once it took hold, being near the source (i.e. reapers, etc.) had no bearing on the victim's state of mind. Why would an indoctrinated individual fully reveal their goals to the enemy? If the person is under the influence of reapers, I seriously doubt they'd spout the reapers' plans. Unless we're supposed to believe this was some sort of Benezia type mind "reserve." I really hope IGN's preview is quite an abridged account.

Since when have the ME2 writers been arsed about contradicting anything that has previously been established?

[Naltair]

I never really bought into the Relays are indestructible notion, although one surviving the blast wave of a supernova is pretty intense.

[Irrepressible]

JamieCOTC wrote...

II J0SePh X II wrote...

IrishSpectre257 wrote...

You know, allowing this mission to be available before the suicide mission kinda weakens the plot of ME2.

I'll just be playing post-game and pretending it's been months since the suicide mission...

+1

Worst thing about it imo. I'll be doing the same as you, but, when I do my Adept playthru, Hackett will be there after I slip in disk 2

+2

I have to imagine that it will play better after the SM, just like LotSB.  I have to say, after reading the second page. Arrival could be an epic personal story for Shep or it could be a "pew pew" fest.  Wishes for both.

So i'm the only thinking that it's available immediately after Horizon in order to cater for those who moved on from ME and don't have their saves anymore?

[Tazzmission]

samuraix87 wrote...

didnt the cdn enties say she has been missing for weeks or something and what about the cerberus team on the reaper how long were they their

i know the derelic reaper was millions maybe even billions years old according to the illusive man. i do remember something that a brown star caused it to become derelic so thats another thing that needs to be adressed

[IrishSpectre257]

Irrepressible wrote...

So i'm the only thinking that it's available immediately after Horizon in order to cater for those who moved on from ME and don't have their saves anymore?

If you've moved on and deleted your saves, why would you care about this DLC?

[samuraix87]

how long was cerberus on the derilict reaper from the way it sounded in game it was only weeks

[Tazzmission]

samuraix87 wrote...

how long was cerberus on the derilict reaper from the way it sounded in game it was only weeks

i have no idea. id like to guess 2 years after the attack on the citadel but i dont know if its fully been mentioned

[I...AM...KROGAN]

Tazzmission wrote...

well look at saren. whats the year gap when he got indoctrinated between the novel and the first game? also for all we know the person in the new dlc couldve had that artifact longer before it became public knowledge

I never read the novels, so I can't comment on Saren before ME1.

My question is concerning the person being indoctrinated once near a certain object. According to IGN, until Shepard is escorted to the facility containing the object, this person is acting "normal." Once near the object, the person and her team ambush Shepard. But that makes no sense! How could she even know Shepard would come to rescue her? Is she psychic? And even assuming she somehow knew, why would she tell him the reapers' plans before the ambush takes place?

Again, maybe our knowledge of the nature of indoctrination is incomplete. That's been alluded to at different points (Virmire). But the indoctrination has never seemed to depend on closeness to the source. Once it takes hold, it seems to stay with a person no matter where they go. Basically, it scrambles your brain. Even Benezia, regarded as extremely strong-willed, could only hold off the effects for mere moments; a single conversation.

[Irrepressible]

IrishSpectre257 wrote...

Irrepressible wrote...

So i'm the only thinking that it's available immediately after Horizon in order to cater for those who moved on from ME and don't have their saves anymore?

If you've moved on and deleted your saves, why would you care about this DLC?

Well, it ain't all that uncommon for DLC to reignite people's interest in a game, and certainly isn't uncommon for people to delete save games to create space (mainly talking 360 here).

[Tazzmission]

I...AM...KROGAN wrote...

Tazzmission wrote...

well look at saren. whats the year gap when he got indoctrinated between the novel and the first game? also for all we know the person in the new dlc couldve had that artifact longer before it became public knowledge

I never read the novels, so I can't comment on Saren before ME1.

My question is concerning the person being indoctrinated once near a certain object. According to IGN, until Shepard is escorted to the facility containing the object, this person is acting "normal." Once near the object, the person and her team ambush Shepard. But that makes no sense! How could she even know Shepard would come to rescue her? Is she psychic? And even assuming she somehow knew, why would she tell him the reapers' plans before the ambush takes place?

Again, maybe our knowledge of the nature of indoctrination is incomplete. That's been alluded to at different points (Virmire). But the indoctrination has never seemed to depend on closeness to the source. Once it takes hold, it seems to stay with a person no matter where they go. Basically, it scrambles your brain. Even Benezia, regarded as extremely strong-willed, could only hold off the effects for mere moments; a single conversation.

i have a theory that maybe some humans have been indoctrinated during the evens of me2. i also feel that a certain someone set shepard up if you catch my drift

[Jaron Oberyn]

So even after all of this time, and bringing in the VA's for ME3, they're going to cut squadmates entirely from the DLC with a weak excuse about Hackett wanting you to go alone? Took two DLC's for you guys to come up with an excuse like this? It also sucks for those people who wanted ashley/kaiden to be in the last DLC.

-Polite

[Naltair]

It's a trap, I suspect Hackett is an unwitting participant... hopefully.

Don't make me have to put a bullet in Hackett, it would be like killing Old Yeller.

/cry

[Tazzmission]

PoliteAssasin wrote...

So even after all of this time, and bringing in the VA's for ME3, they're going to cut squadmates entirely from the DLC with a weak excuse about Hackett wanting you to go alone? Took two DLC's for you guys to come up with an excuse like this? It also sucks for those people who wanted ashley/kaiden to be in the last DLC.

-Polite

tbh i like the idea of the final dlc of shep going solo. and why complain we are getting 5 missions total so for all we know the first part can be solo wile the rest is with your squad. all i can say is lets wait till tuesday and then give our options on it.

[samuraix87]

who knows the squad could show up at the last mission who knows

[sonofalich]

sounds sexy, i can't wait for Tuesday.

[Tazzmission]

Naltair wrote...

It's a trap, I suspect Hackett is an unwitting participant... hopefully.

Don't make me have to put a bullet in Hackett, it would be like killing Old Yeller.

/cry

itll be cool if hackett ends up as a double agent for both the alliance and cerbrus. picture the smoking man from xfiles. during the day he works with the fbi but at night his true intentions are shown

[I...AM...KROGAN]

Tazzmission wrote...

Naltair wrote...

It's a trap, I suspect Hackett is an unwitting participant... hopefully.

Don't make me have to put a bullet in Hackett, it would be like killing Old Yeller.

/cry

itll be cool if hackett ends up as a double agent for both the alliance and cerbrus. picture the smoking man from xfiles. during the day he works with the fbi but at night his true intentions are shown

Nah, Cerberus is probably an arm of the Alliance.