Aller au contenu

Photo

Anders crisis


316 réponses à ce sujet

#76
hoorayforicecream

hoorayforicecream
  • Members
  • 3 420 messages

DeaHamlet wrote...

Ahmmm not exactly.  You can make Fenris fight for mages as a friend as well.  
And when you convince Merrill to give up blood magic, you're not convincing her to start killing innocent mages.
It's so not the same thing, not by a long shot.


All of the mages that Hawke's group kills are either attacking Hawke or turned into abominations, then attacking Hawke. They aren't exactly innocent.

#77
Anarya

Anarya
  • Members
  • 5 552 messages
It's really not the same thing as rivalry with Fenris or Merrill. Neither of them have convictions that are consuming them mind body and soul, like Anders. It makes no sense for Anders to side with the templars. Fenris and Merrill value Hawke above whatever they feel about mages vs. templars, if you max out their bar on either end. Anders is incapable of valuing anything over his cause.

I wish there was a way to convince him his merging with Justice was wrong without either siding against innocent mages or slaughtering them in the end, because I do feel like he needs some sense talked into him but I also feel that, as the situations are presented in the game, siding with mages is generally the better thing to do.

#78
DeaHamlet

DeaHamlet
  • Members
  • 972 messages

SurelyForth wrote...

hoorayforicecream wrote...

Not all of the mages were innocent, but the citizens of Kirkwall certainly were. They were the innocents I was talking about... and you can tell, because there are a lot of extra corpses on the way to the Gallows that aren't templars or mages. Siding with the templars wouldn't be about furthering their goal (though there is the option of saving some mages even though the rite has been invoked, as Cullen mentions), but about ending the conflict with the fewest lost lives possible.

Side with the templars: innocent people dead
Don't side with the templars, and let the conflict keep going on longer: many more innocent people dead

It's a numbers game.


So send the templars through Kirkwall to defend them from the abominations that are popping up in the street. The Gallows is a prison, as long as the mages are kept inside of the Gallows they are not a threat to the citizens of Kirkwall.

Orsino was willing to lay down his objections and compromise with Meredith. He begs her to not kill the Circle mages and tells her that he will help her with her search himself. Despite what he does later, he was trying to end the conflict as peacefully as possible and was shot down by Meredith.


Totally shot down, she didn't even think for a second about it!
It's like she just wanted an excuse, any excuse by this point... 
If I was Anders I'd be pretty pissed at Hawke...
So you convinced me the way to redemption and to prevent a war I must kill innocent mages alongside you and ignore the fact that Orsino tried desperately to stay Meredith's hand... and in the end we STILL had to fight Meredith and the war between mages and templars STILL started.
WHAT DID YOU DO TO ME, YOU AWEFUL WOMAN/MAN?
I'd be pissed if I was Anders on the rivalmance with Hawke that sides with templars.

#79
hoorayforicecream

hoorayforicecream
  • Members
  • 3 420 messages

SurelyForth wrote...

So send the templars through Kirkwall to defend them from the abominations that are popping up in the street. The Gallows is a prison, as long as the mages are kept inside of the Gallows they are not a threat to the citizens of Kirkwall.

Orsino was willing to lay down his objections and compromise with Meredith. He begs her to not kill the Circle mages and tells her that he will help her with her search himself. Despite what he does later, he was trying to end the conflict as peacefully as possible and was shot down by Meredith.


And if Hawke had some sort of control over Meredith, this is probably what would have happened. But we're not discussing "What if Hawke was the Knight-Commander". Meredith had already gone off the deep end. She was already starting on her rampage. The only thing Hawke could do at that point was try to keep casualties to a minimum, which is exactly what Hawke says they are doing. That's Hawke's goal when siding with the templars, not killing innocent mages. Keeping casualties to a minimum is something a repentant Anders would agree to.

#80
DeaHamlet

DeaHamlet
  • Members
  • 972 messages

hoorayforicecream wrote...

DeaHamlet wrote...

Ahmmm not exactly.  You can make Fenris fight for mages as a friend as well.  
And when you convince Merrill to give up blood magic, you're not convincing her to start killing innocent mages.
It's so not the same thing, not by a long shot.


All of the mages that Hawke's group kills are either attacking Hawke or turned into abominations, then attacking Hawke. They aren't exactly innocent.


1. I sided with the templars.  There were many mages I had to kill that were not abominations.  
2. Even Anders didn't turn into anything fighting me.
3. The scene they show between templars and mages is disgusting to see... anyone not turning into abominations is cut down without even the largest of efforts.  It's a SLAUGHTER.  There is no other way to describe it.

I was more miffed at Orsino turning crazy on the mage-side, but then again you cannot compare pro-templar versus pro-mage that's metagaming.  So as far as a pro-templar is concerned, Orsino was backed into a corner and made use of any knowledge he had ever gathered and hit back.  And then Meredith went crazy.
Metagame, we know they're both with many many faults and freaking crazy.  Does that have anything to say about it being a slaughter any less?

#81
DeaHamlet

DeaHamlet
  • Members
  • 972 messages

hoorayforicecream wrote...

SurelyForth wrote...

So send the templars through Kirkwall to defend them from the abominations that are popping up in the street. The Gallows is a prison, as long as the mages are kept inside of the Gallows they are not a threat to the citizens of Kirkwall.

Orsino was willing to lay down his objections and compromise with Meredith. He begs her to not kill the Circle mages and tells her that he will help her with her search himself. Despite what he does later, he was trying to end the conflict as peacefully as possible and was shot down by Meredith.


And if Hawke had some sort of control over Meredith, this is probably what would have happened. But we're not discussing "What if Hawke was the Knight-Commander". Meredith had already gone off the deep end. She was already starting on her rampage. The only thing Hawke could do at that point was try to keep casualties to a minimum, which is exactly what Hawke says they are doing. That's Hawke's goal when siding with the templars, not killing innocent mages. Keeping casualties to a minimum is something a repentant Anders would agree to.


You are applying your own Hawke's feelings on the matter.
Hawke can be built to be completely pro-templar and think mages are evil and must be contained and, if that not possible, killed or made tranquil.
And even in THAT case Hawke can convince Anders to repent by killing mages.
How does it excuse it in that case?  The game makes ZERO difference between a Hawke that just wants to stop a war and a Hawke that thinks mages are a menace and now must be killed since containing them is not working?

#82
Anarya

Anarya
  • Members
  • 5 552 messages

hoorayforicecream wrote...

SurelyForth wrote...

So send the templars through Kirkwall to defend them from the abominations that are popping up in the street. The Gallows is a prison, as long as the mages are kept inside of the Gallows they are not a threat to the citizens of Kirkwall.

Orsino was willing to lay down his objections and compromise with Meredith. He begs her to not kill the Circle mages and tells her that he will help her with her search himself. Despite what he does later, he was trying to end the conflict as peacefully as possible and was shot down by Meredith.


And if Hawke had some sort of control over Meredith, this is probably what would have happened. But we're not discussing "What if Hawke was the Knight-Commander". Meredith had already gone off the deep end. She was already starting on her rampage. The only thing Hawke could do at that point was try to keep casualties to a minimum, which is exactly what Hawke says they are doing. That's Hawke's goal when siding with the templars, not killing innocent mages. Keeping casualties to a minimum is something a repentant Anders would agree to.


I agree that what Hawke SAYS makes sense. S/he claims to be restoring order and minimizing casualties. But what you have to DO is help the templars with the Right of Annulment against essentially uninvolved parties, and you have the help of the one at fault to do it. It's complete madness.

#83
Sylvanpyxie

Sylvanpyxie
  • Members
  • 1 036 messages
Hmmm... When i Rivalry Romanced Anders, it always felt to me as if he was accepting the choice of helping the Templars simply because of Hawke..

It felt as if he was going against his very nature in an attempt to prove to Hawke that he could finally fight his, and Justice's, rage and hate. It felt like he was trying to prove that he would never again, let anything of this magnitude happen because of him, or Justice.

It felt like, for once, he'd taken a great leap in self control, fighting against everything he deeply believed in so he could prove, to Hawke and Himself, that he could finally have his mind and his body back...

I had never seen it as Anders helping the Templars... But i can understand how people would... It's something i'll have to consider for a while i think.

Modifié par Sylvanpyxie, 25 mars 2011 - 05:45 .


#84
DeaHamlet

DeaHamlet
  • Members
  • 972 messages

Anarya wrote...

hoorayforicecream wrote...

SurelyForth wrote...

So send the templars through Kirkwall to defend them from the abominations that are popping up in the street. The Gallows is a prison, as long as the mages are kept inside of the Gallows they are not a threat to the citizens of Kirkwall.

Orsino was willing to lay down his objections and compromise with Meredith. He begs her to not kill the Circle mages and tells her that he will help her with her search himself. Despite what he does later, he was trying to end the conflict as peacefully as possible and was shot down by Meredith.


And if Hawke had some sort of control over Meredith, this is probably what would have happened. But we're not discussing "What if Hawke was the Knight-Commander". Meredith had already gone off the deep end. She was already starting on her rampage. The only thing Hawke could do at that point was try to keep casualties to a minimum, which is exactly what Hawke says they are doing. That's Hawke's goal when siding with the templars, not killing innocent mages. Keeping casualties to a minimum is something a repentant Anders would agree to.


I agree that what Hawke SAYS makes sense. S/he claims to be restoring order and minimizing casualties. But what you have to DO is help the templars with the Right of Annulment against essentially uninvolved parties, and you have the help of the one at fault to do it. It's complete madness.


Madness is the correct word.

#85
SurelyForth

SurelyForth
  • Members
  • 6 816 messages

hoorayforicecream wrote...

SurelyForth wrote...

So send the templars through Kirkwall to defend them from the abominations that are popping up in the street. The Gallows is a prison, as long as the mages are kept inside of the Gallows they are not a threat to the citizens of Kirkwall.

Orsino was willing to lay down his objections and compromise with Meredith. He begs her to not kill the Circle mages and tells her that he will help her with her search himself. Despite what he does later, he was trying to end the conflict as peacefully as possible and was shot down by Meredith.


And if Hawke had some sort of control over Meredith, this is probably what would have happened. But we're not discussing "What if Hawke was the Knight-Commander". Meredith had already gone off the deep end. She was already starting on her rampage. The only thing Hawke could do at that point was try to keep casualties to a minimum, which is exactly what Hawke says they are doing. That's Hawke's goal when siding with the templars, not killing innocent mages. Keeping casualties to a minimum is something a repentant Anders would agree to.


Hawke's motivess are one thing, and I can concede that point that siding with the mages can be about minimizing casualties (although I think that a Hawke who recognizes how insane Meredith is should never aid her). However, the bolded point is where I disagree. He might be repentent, but he's earning his atonement through the slaying of innocent mages and I cannot draw a line from any version of Anders that I have seen to that without resorting to scribbly, angry lines at the point where Hawke convinces him to stay and fight.

#86
Pseudo the Mustachioed

Pseudo the Mustachioed
  • Members
  • 3 900 messages

Anarya wrote...
It's really not the same thing as rivalry with Fenris or Merrill. Neither of them have convictions that are consuming them mind body and soul, like Anders. It makes no sense for Anders to side with the templars. Fenris and Merrill value Hawke above whatever they feel about mages vs. templars, if you max out their bar on either end. Anders is incapable of valuing anything over his cause. 


This. And especially since Justice repeatedly demonstrates he can assume direct control if he doesn't like how things are going... I don't even see how this is possible. A wizard did it I guess.

Modifié par Pseudocognition, 25 mars 2011 - 06:29 .


#87
marquiseondore

marquiseondore
  • Members
  • 1 293 messages
Gee, well another thing the guide book left out from the Romance/Character section. <_<  Thinking that Anders leaves if you side with the Templars has influenced my last 4 playthroughs.

#88
Eydris Ivo

Eydris Ivo
  • Members
  • 579 messages

marquiseondore wrote...

Gee, well another thing the guide book left out from the Romance/Character section. <_<  Thinking that Anders leaves if you side with the Templars has influenced my last 4 playthroughs.


I know, I was blown away. However, we still don't know exactly how to get this ending as people have tried with no luck.

#89
Hellosanta

Hellosanta
  • Members
  • 823 messages
To be honest, I just want that kiss scene from Anders crisis ending. It's just .. lame that I don't get the kiss scene from siding with mages :(

#90
Inzhuna

Inzhuna
  • Members
  • 1 928 messages
Right, Anders admitted he was wrong the whole time, but this scene didn't happen. Can someone confirm they managed to get this on their playthrough without using console? What options do you have to pick?

#91
Addai

Addai
  • Members
  • 25 848 messages

SurelyForth wrote...
Hawke's motivess are one thing, and I can concede that point that siding with the mages can be about minimizing casualties (although I think that a Hawke who recognizes how insane Meredith is should never aid her). However, the bolded point is where I disagree. He might be repentent, but he's earning his atonement through the slaying of innocent mages and I cannot draw a line from any version of Anders that I have seen to that without resorting to scribbly, angry lines at the point where Hawke convinces him to stay and fight.

I think you would just have to see it as a reverse mania owing to Justice/ Vengeance's influence.  The Anders we knew wouldn't blow up a Chantry with innocent people in it, nor would he annul a Circle.  Dude is a mess of ricocheting complexes.

#92
Camenae

Camenae
  • Members
  • 825 messages

Jennifer Brandes Hepler wrote...

It is in the final game. If you get to full rivalry with Anders and convince him that it was wrong to merge with Justice, then you have the option to get him to side with the Templars with you. It is only available if you complete the final rivalry stage and get him to admit he's been wrong the whole time.


Can someone please, please tell me how exactly I get this to happen, in terms of which conversation options to pick?  I'm at 100% rivalry and I did his act 3 questioning beliefs quest, but I obviously did it wrong because he still won't come with me.

#93
Inzhuna

Inzhuna
  • Members
  • 1 928 messages
Camenae, I'm with you. I fear it's bugged.

#94
Hellosanta

Hellosanta
  • Members
  • 823 messages
I did get him to come with me to side with templars ..... but I failed in romance, oh shoot.

#95
Inzhuna

Inzhuna
  • Members
  • 1 928 messages

Hellosanta wrote...

I did get him to come with me to side with templars ..... but I failed in romance, oh shoot.


So it IS possible? Is it only bugged on some playthroughs, perhaps? Do you remember which conversations options you picked?

#96
Camenae

Camenae
  • Members
  • 825 messages
Yes Hellosanta or anyone else who knows, please share. and Hellosanta you said you did it even without romancing Anders if I read your post correctly? Because at this point it's the only thing I can think of that I didn't do

#97
marquiseondore

marquiseondore
  • Members
  • 1 293 messages
I created save points for all my conversations with Anders, so I'll test it out.

#98
Eydris Ivo

Eydris Ivo
  • Members
  • 579 messages

Camenae wrote...

Yes Hellosanta or anyone else who knows, please share. and Hellosanta you said you did it even without romancing Anders if I read your post correctly? Because at this point it's the only thing I can think of that I didn't do


There is a kiss at the conclusion of the romance on templar side. So it's supposed to be possible to romance him and get him to side with the templars. I'm so curious on this!

#99
Inzhuna

Inzhuna
  • Members
  • 1 928 messages
I think I definitely completed full Rivalry Jennifer talks about. Anders said that Hawke was right all along but Justice is too strong. Unless it is very specific about the conversation options, I think it's heavily bugged.

#100
Esoj16

Esoj16
  • Members
  • 179 messages
Siding with the templars isn't the "evil" choice, first of all, neither is it the "good" choice, I think both choices have merits. My Hawke that sided with the Templars thought the circle was already lost, he'd been nice to most mages throughout the game and they were still turning to blood magic like there was no tomorrow, they even kidnapped the sibling even though you helped them! (that made me mad) As it turned out, most of the circle really was lost already, the corruption ran too deep with the first enchanter hiding blood mages, and worse (Quentin), among his ranks. I did however spare the mages that gave up readily, I don't think all of them deserved to die, and that scene of the templars slaughtering mages was a horrible sight, even if templars didn't come off unscathed. My Hawke that sided with the Mages thought that the circle was not to blame and that those few innocent mages deserved to live without fear of the extremely abusive Templars of Kirkwall. So to me both sides have their merits, as it turns out though, I think Templars are better than mages because most templars simply want to protect the people of Kirkwall, while most mages crave for their freedom so badly that they are willing to make deals with demons, and I think Orsino made a pretty good example of why mages should never be trusted with policing their own. I blame the thin veil around Kirkwall.

As far as this new development with Anders, I think it makes Anders even worse, he's willing to help slaughter innocent mages because of something HE did, maybe one day I'll do a playthrough where I spare him, but I just don't see it happening any time soon.