Nah, not this time.CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
Zulu_DFA wrote...
CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
If humanity has never gone to trial for warcrimes before, they could be establishing this as they go along. Like when we selected the Hague as... well... the Hague. They may be selecting a location given weight by their particular history, in order to show their seriousness.Zulu_DFA wrote...
Besides, the GI article actually doesn't even say it's going to be a trial per se, just some kind of inquiry/interrogation (while the Alliance will be tinkering with the Normandy), which makes it even more nonsensical to have it anywhere but the Arcturus Station. Unless there is a very good reason for it, and the narrative makes it at least as much clear as the out-of-game reason: put Shepard on Earth during the Reaper invasion for the kicks of it.
To some extent, this kind of a quibble isn't something we can sort out here. It may be an inconsistency, one that nobody else sees,
http://social.biowar...5/index/6865789
http://social.biowar...50/polls/17804/
Judging by the start, I'm sure there'll be more, come the ME3 release.CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
but that you have cleverly detected. If it is, it's one that doesn't really matter at all. It's an apartment on Intai'sei, as kids like to say around here. It's something you feel like you were promised, but that most people never even processed as a relevant fact in any way, shape or form.
You've found an inconsistency that bothers you. That's fine, I respect that. I can't watch Star Trek: Generations because of the plot holes between that and the series finale of Star Trek: TNG. (LOOK, in All Good Things we DISTINCTLY see a future 1701-D that has been retrofitted with a third Nacell. How could that happen if the ship crashes and is unsalvageable!) Fact is, most other people don't see it as such. It's like when I was reading Anansi Boys - it's stated that Anansi doesn't have any friends, because all the animals are afraid of being tricked by him... wheras in African Myth, Turtle is still Anansi's friend, because Turtle always tricks Anansi right back. It really, really bothered me that Turtle didn't appear in the novel. Then I realized that he didn't appear because it wasn't bloody important. It was Anansi's story, and it would be muddled by representing the other African trickster animal god. So, despite the fact that Turtle should have totally been in that book, I was willing to look aside, and at this point I like it more than American Gods (which has even worse plot holes, mythologically. Great story, though. Well-written.)
I don't see what an extremely minor plot issue has to do with this thread I also fail to see what Arrival has to do with any of this.
Zaeed is a good idea. That's for sure.CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
You probably won't find someone who hated Arrival more than me. I offered to pay another $7 to unplay it after it was released. I think it is honestly the worst thing that Bioware has ever made. I also think how bad it is has no bearing on what ME3 will be like, just like the design problems in BDtS and Pinnacle Station turned out not to be indicative of any bad new direction for ME2. They were offshoots, designed to test whether a certain idea was viable. That idea turned out not to be viable, so they didn't do it again.
I'd rather get back to talking about returning characters and interesting plot variations here, rather than turning it into another thread about how the trial has to be on earth, or how Arrival isn't very good. Believe me: I agree - ARRIVAL ISN'T VERY GOOD. Can we now just never speak of it again?
Hopefully we can get back to the more interesting topic of returning characters. Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic - First day Zaeed-style DLC with every new game - good idea or bad idea? Discuss.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




