52 réponses à ce sujet

[Queef Master]

... you would be right.

This game is god damn terrible.  Who the **** came up with this shyt?

[David Davidson]

dat username

[JerryRogers]

[CRISIS1717]

Yeah it does suck.

[JerryRogers]

[Purgatious]

[Stringy Pete]

I Got Laidlaw-ed....

OMG hauhau

[CRISIS1717]

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

[Eterna]

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

[nardo shin]

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

Have the opinion a game is very poor; want to prevent others from being dragged into a $60 trap of glitches and poor writing and combat that makes me feel like i'm playing a dynasty warrior game; must be a troll!

[omgtehwhale]

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

QFT

[Eterna]

nardo shin wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

Have the opinion a game is very poor; want to prevent others from being dragged into a $60 trap of glitches and poor writing and combat that makes me feel like i'm playing a dynasty warrior game; must be a troll!

 All the posts with good constructive criticism are burried beneath a pile of hate posts,

[CRISIS1717]

They don't need good constructive criticism, they already know they should have made Origins 2.

[Persephone]

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

Never mind that it's an insult to people's intelligence.  Most buyers of this game will never even SEE this forum, much less care about what some haters (As opposed to those who post constructive criticism) are spouting.

[PlumPaul93]

Eterna5 wrote...

nardo shin wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

Have the opinion a game is very poor; want to prevent others from being dragged into a $60 trap of glitches and poor writing and combat that makes me feel like i'm playing a dynasty warrior game; must be a troll!

 All the posts with good constructive criticism are burried beneath a pile of hate posts,

yep or ones regarding japan,spoilers, or the giraffedog. I'd recommend not posting in this threads so they fall to oblivion.

[Persephone]

CRISIS1717 wrote...

They don't need good constructive criticism, they already know they should have made Origins 2.

Broken record still playing. Still not convincing.

[Persephone]

PlumPaul82393 wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

nardo shin wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

Have the opinion a game is very poor; want to prevent others from being dragged into a $60 trap of glitches and poor writing and combat that makes me feel like i'm playing a dynasty warrior game; must be a troll!

 All the posts with good constructive criticism are burried beneath a pile of hate posts,

yep or ones regarding japan,spoilers, or the giraffedog. I'd recommend not posting in this threads so they fall to oblivion.

They'll just post some more until they find another game to slander.

[Rockworm503]

CRISIS1717 wrote...

They don't need good constructive criticism, they already know they should have made Origins 2.

50 bucks says they do that and you all will complain that they didn't do something different.

[omgtehwhale]

http://tvtropes.org/...gedItNowItSucks
http://tvtropes.org/...eSameNowItSucks

they cant win.

[nardo shin]

Eterna5 wrote...

nardo shin wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

Have the opinion a game is very poor; want to prevent others from being dragged into a $60 trap of glitches and poor writing and combat that makes me feel like i'm playing a dynasty warrior game; must be a troll!

 All the posts with good constructive criticism are burried beneath a pile of hate posts,

from what I've seen; posts with any critism seems to "SPAM END OF LINE" or recieve bans blocking access to content or are told they're wrong in responce to a freakin opinion.

Modifié par nardo shin, 26 mars 2011 - 10:10 .

[shai-hulud-lama]

since the realese of DA2 i always check the joining date of the posters here....it's a good way to ignore all the trolls.

[Bathead]

nardo shin wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

nardo shin wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

Have the opinion a game is very poor; want to prevent others from being dragged into a $60 trap of glitches and poor writing and combat that makes me feel like i'm playing a dynasty warrior game; must be a troll!

 All the posts with good constructive criticism are burried beneath a pile of hate posts,

from what I've seen; posts with any critism seems to "SPAM END OF LINE" or recieve bans blocking access to content or are told they're wrong in responce to a freakin opinion.

That is a total and utter lie, no-one has been banned for critcizing BW/DA2. AAMOF, the second person to get banned (TEZ19) was banned for breaking forum rules  while defending Bioware/DA2 and bashing critics of the game. And any threads that were locked were locked for legit reasons, I.E. spamming. You people need to quit spreading lies.

Modifié par Bathead, 26 mars 2011 - 10:38 .

[nardo shin]

Bathead wrote...

nardo shin wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

nardo shin wrote...

Eterna5 wrote...

CRISIS1717 wrote...

I love how this is the first thing people will see if they come to check out what the Dragon Age 2 reception is like.

 I agree, it would be funny to see a bunch trolls who have nothing better to do than ****.

Have the opinion a game is very poor; want to prevent others from being dragged into a $60 trap of glitches and poor writing and combat that makes me feel like i'm playing a dynasty warrior game; must be a troll!

 All the posts with good constructive criticism are burried beneath a pile of hate posts,

from what I've seen; posts with any critism seems to "SPAM END OF LINE" or recieve bans blocking access to content or are told they're wrong in responce to a freakin opinion.

That is a total and utter lie, no-one has been banned for critcizing BW/DA2. AAMOF, the second person to get banned (TEZ19) was banned for breaking forum rules  while defending Bioware/DA2 and bashing critics of the game. And any threads that were locked were locked for legit reasons, I.E. spamming. You people need to quit spreading lies.

weee ******! http://social.biowar...index/6459941/1 and weee woo! http://www.pcgamer.c...anned-forumite/ read the topic then read the news story then try saying that again or am I a troll even when providing the burden of proof?

[Bathead]

I never said they weren't banned, I said the weren't banned for posting a negative opinion, they were banne dfor breaking forum rules. And, like I said tez19 was banned for breaking the forum rules while defending Bioware, which puts the lie to the assertion people are banned for being negative about the game. You seem to be conveniently ignoring Tez19's case.

[nardo shin]

"Have you sold your souls to the EA devil?" this question generally directed at bioware resulted in a ban, now with "tez19" I'm not aware of the situation a link or transcript would be more useful than hear say from yourself.