Are we being forced to take Wynne?
#1
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 06:58
There are only two mages in the game - a huge mistake from my perspective. Why have 5+ warrior choices and only 2 mages?
Anyways, if Morrigan can't be turned into a decent healer (if she can't access the Spirit Healer spec)... does every successful party have to include the old lady?
#2
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 06:59
#3
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 06:59
#4
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:00
I do not think that spirit healer is that crucial though.
#5
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:01
Modifié par Taleroth, 29 octobre 2009 - 07:01 .
#6
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:01
#7
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:01
#8
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:02
You'll see I asked that question in our UK boy's thread over there where you also voiced your concerns about being cornholed into bringing Wynne. For your sake, hopefully it will be enough to give Morrigan a basic healing spell and carry around some potions. For mine, I'm hoping Morrigan can be weaned from her hellish fury, and focus more on those Weakness / Disorient spells and pick up some healing qualities along the way.
#9
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:03
#10
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:03
#11
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:06
As an experienced raider, I can say that Wynne is nothing compared to the spoiled healers, who by the way demand worshiping, some of the guilds I've went through had.
#12
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:14
Razcalking1978 wrote...
From what I saw on the Warden's Quest event as well as various gameplay videos, it seems that the game will be near-impossible, even on normal settings, without a primary healer.
There are only two mages in the game - a huge mistake from my perspective. Why have 5+ warrior choices and only 2 mages?
Anyways, if Morrigan can't be turned into a decent healer (if she can't access the Spirit Healer spec)... does every successful party have to include the old lady?
You are not forced to take Wynne. You can be a mage yourself, you can use Morrigan as a healer, and there a non-magical methods of healing such as the potions made with the herbalism skill.
#13
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:15
Modifié par Raven2131990, 29 octobre 2009 - 07:15 .
#14
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:16
#15
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:18
#16
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:18
I agree, however, that playing on Nightmare will most likely require Wynne and perhaps Shale for how much dmg you'll be taking.
My "nightmare" group will either be
Shale, Wynne, Myself as a warrior and either Zev or Morrigan (whoever does more dps)
or
Shale, Wynne, Myself as dps mage and the dwarf dude.
Modifié par On_Slaught, 29 octobre 2009 - 07:19 .
#17
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:23
Raven2131990 wrote...
this isnt a raid though, its a single player game. id imagine wynn is being cast as the standard healer, but you can always level morrigan up as a healer first
Well, Nightmare kind of is.
Imagine the difficulty levels from a WoW player's perspective:
Casual - beating a bunch of non-elites.
Normal - beating a bunch of quest elites.
Hard - beating an instance.
Nightmare - beating an Heroic instance.
Now, any experienced WoW player would know that going into a Heroic instance with an off-spec healer is pretty much suicidal, while a somewhat good and skilled off-spec healer may just work on Normal/Hard.
#18
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:24
#19
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:27
soteria wrote...
One thing to remember about the WQ was that they were playing competitively. Is it optimum to have the best healer possible on harder difficulties? Maybe. Is it necessary? No.
We won't really know that until we play the game. Though the difficulty(or rather requirement) here smells like WoW-level.
#20
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:28
#21
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:29
#22
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:32
If that's all you're worried about, deal with it. You'll have a much happier life if you do.
Modifié par Alocormin, 29 octobre 2009 - 07:33 .
#23
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:33
Which isn't that much, really. You could beat almost everything with an offspec healer if he knew what he was doing (the main problem was that most didn't) and that was even back when the game wasn't so casual;)GhoXen wrote...
We won't really know that until we play the game. Though the difficulty(or rather requirement) here smells like WoW-level.
/end sort-of rant
Modifié par Fulgrim88, 29 octobre 2009 - 07:33 .
#24
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:36
Alocormin wrote...
Let's put it this way. If you have an issue with the game being too difficult without a healer, that's one thing; and you should probably play your game around compensating that.
If that's all you're worried about, deal with it. You'll have a much happier life if you do.
No, I'll have an issue if the game is impossible without a dedicated healer, and they only gave me one real character that can do that.
Imagine if they only offered you one choice of a warrior that could act as a useful tank, and if you wanted to succeed at all, you had to take that one tank, even if he was annoying as all-out.
#25
Posté 29 octobre 2009 - 07:36
Fulgrim88 wrote...
Which isn't that much, really. You could beat almost everything with an offspec healer if he knew what he was doing (the main problem was that most didn't) and that was even back when the game wasn't so casual;)
/end sort-of rant
True, but just as I mentioned before: normal instances may work with off-spec healers, while Heroics probably won't.





Retour en haut






