249 réponses à ce sujet

[Grunddr]

Since maybe the you US guys are already playing this, and I'm still wating for the friday EU unlock (grr!), I might as well ask how it will run on my laptop (preferably at the native resolution - 1280x800)



AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 @2.00GHz

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 (512MB)

2 GB RAM

Vista SP2 32bit

[Onzazero]

Okay, I'm thinking I'll have to buy this for my PS3.

My laptop:
- Windows XP SP3
- Intel Core2Duo T7300 @ 2.0 GHz
- 2GB RAM @ 2.0 GHz
- GeForce 8600M GT w/ 512MB
- 1280x800 (17" screen)

I'm guessing low settings, otherwise medium will cause massive slowdown when there's more than 10 enemies on screen (happens in Oblivion).

On the other hand, I play PS3 on a Pioneer PDP-LX5090 (50")...

Does the PS3 version of the game support mouse and keyboard use?

Modifié par Onzazero, 03 novembre 2009 - 08:33 .

[Onzazero]

Double-post, sorry.

Modifié par Onzazero, 03 novembre 2009 - 08:39 .

[lizardglenn]

It has been playing quite well on the 9600 GT 512MB

i had it maxed thru the human origin at 1080p it was staying around 30+ FPS mostly not much slowdown at all in game

(CPU was running @2.5GHz BTW), took the AA off when i left the castle

[Laststardreamer]

Hello everyone.

I hava *small* problem. Been waiting for DA:O for quite some time now and until a few hours ago i was going to get the Xbox360 version since i am unsure how my computer runs it. However it all changed when i read the Gamespot review. :S

Here are my computer specs:



AMD Phenom 8550 Triple Core. Windows Vista 64Bit.

6Gb Ram.

Ati Radeon HD 4650 1Gb Ram. ( Says something like up to 2Gb. Whatever that means. )

24´ Widescreen.



Since i´m not a computer genius and never will be, i kinda need to know how my computer will run DA:O. I´m more than willing to disable shadows and, but i need to

play at 1200x 720 reolution ´cus of my display. I´ m *not* thinking of going any higher since i know my comp wont be able to handle anything beyond 1200x720.

I guess it all comes down to this: with my currect spec, should i just get the Xbox version or am i able to get a a slightly better looking game with my current spec?



Thanks everyone!

[fooliecooly]

@Legobrick100, depends on your resolution and videocard.



Just got my hands on the ATI 5850! so impossible to find



However, DA runs surprisingly well on a 320MB 8800GTS on Very High settings @ 1920x1200 minus AA, with a couple frame stutters. The 5850 should be able to run it at a higher FPS and AA I hope.



The rest of my specs for reference is 4gb DDR2-800, e6750 (conroe) clocked at 3.2gHz. If you have a card equivalent to the older 8800GTS, you should be able to run it no problem at a lower resolution.

[BigRed037]

I preordered DAO for the xbox 360. Now, I am seeing a lot of fuss about how superior the PC version is. My laptop specs are the same as Grunddr, with the except I'm working with a Nvidia 8400M GS.



I'm assuming I'd be playing on low settings, which doesn't bother me as long as framerate is bearable. For any tech guys out there, would I be ok with the laptop version? Or should i stick with the 360 version?



Thanks.

[bunnyhopper77]

same question as bigred037. My processor and RAM are sufficient, but i have a laptop stuck with 8400GS, which i cant replace. Low-settings and 800 by 600 resolution ok?

[FuzzySilk]

You can run this on a p4. Here are my specs.



p4

1GB Ram

WIN XP sp 3

GeForce 6600(not the GT version)



It runs smooth with low settings at 800 X 600. I am getting 30 fps. I am very happy with this. I bought the game for the 360 and am running through two different origins currently on each. I think with even the graphics turned down low they are comparable to the 360. The textures are better on the 360 but if I want to turn the settings up on my PC I do and it looks awesome(blows the 360 away and i have a low end graphics card). I just drop it back down again when I am ready to get into a fight.



The PC is definitely a more tactical experience and the XBOX feels more action oriented. I am having a blast between the two!

[bunnyhopper77]

fuzzysilk ur not trying to lure me into a trap are you? I've been still on the sideline deciding PC or 360, been waiting for ppl's opinions on the forums for low-end hardware

[Gorgar2k9]

FuzzySilk wrote...

You can run this on a p4. Here are my specs.

p4
1GB Ram
WIN XP sp 3
GeForce 6600(not the GT version)

It runs smooth with low settings at 800 X 600. I am getting 30 fps. I am very happy with this. I bought the game for the 360 and am running through two different origins currently on each. I think with even the graphics turned down low they are comparable to the 360. The textures are better on the 360 but if I want to turn the settings up on my PC I do and it looks awesome(blows the 360 away and i have a low end graphics card). I just drop it back down again when I am ready to get into a fight.

The PC is definitely a more tactical experience and the XBOX feels more action oriented. I am having a blast between the two!

if you like better graphs stick wth XBOX360..otherwise on low PC config its not enjoyable  

[AS_Dodger]

My system is a little old (Core 2 Duo 1.8ghz, 2 gb ram, Nvidia 7900, Win 7) and I am pleasantly surprised at how the game runs. Sure, it's not maxed out, but it looks good and runs (mostly) smoothly. Happy camper

[Elwoodw]

I built out a new machine just for this game. (smile)

Smooth as silk on Intel i7/6gb triple channel/win7/radeon 4890

Load times are quick with RAID 0 on WD velociraptors

[Raven152]

Excellent, my laptop will run on medium to high - all good!

[vortican]

Runs great for me.



E3110 3.0Ghz Xeon

4GB DDR2

8800GT (not GTS)

XP SP3



Running at Max settings except AA 4X. I haven't played very much but the animations appear to be perfect so far. I noticed a few stutters in some cutscenes and conversations and the first two long cutscenes actually were screwed up in the beginning (voices overlapping and stuck screen) but then smoothed out and played fine after that. Not sure what's up with that but during active gameplay, it's very smooth. Load times are a little long between major events but I don't mind that.

[JironGhrad]

As a side note, the ATI cards ending in 50's are usually downclocked chipsets from the next highest level... my X1650 Pro runs the game perfectly on Medium and can do all but the big battles on Medium-high. So, if you have the "50" version from ATI try stepping it up a notch or two and see what you get. *grins*

[Gorath Alpha]

JironGhrad wrote...

As a side note, the ATI cards ending in 50's are usually downclocked chipsets from the next highest level... my X1650 Pro runs the game perfectly on Medium and can do all but the big battles on Medium-high. So, if you have the "50" version from ATI try stepping it up a notch or two and see what you get. *grins*

Interesting and incorrect datum proposed there!  Check the chip codes at GPU Reviews! 

Meanwhile, I think a bump might be in order.

Gorath
-

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 22 novembre 2009 - 01:05 .

[nighthorse2]

Will DA run omn any other video cards I have an: Intel® G45"G43 Express Chipset

These are the attributes from the system checker at D2D

Features: Minimum attributes of your Video Card

Required You Have

Video RAM XP: 128 MB, Vista/7: 256 MB 1.3 GB

Hardware T&L Yes Yes

Pixel Shader version XP: 2.0, Vista/7: 3.0 4.0

Vertex Shader version XP: 2.0, Vista/7: 3.0 4.0

[Gorath Alpha]

Intel does not make any video cards.  Not even one.  They tried it once, ten years ago, and it was crap.  They make onboard (integated into the ASICs) video chips, which are total CRAP, not any good at all for any high intensity 3D gaming.  Sorry. 

Gorath
-

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 27 novembre 2009 - 09:14 .

[ShadowStalker363]

I've got an ATI Mobility 1400x that meets the box system requirements but when i go to launch the game it says that the video card is not supported....any suggestions?

[Gorath Alpha]

ShadowStalker363 wrote...

I've got an ATI Mobility 1400x that meets the box system requirements but when i go to launch the game it says that the video card is not supported....any suggestions?

You simply don't know what you have, which is merely an X1300 clone, and its name tells you that it's for business = "n300 / n400".  The games cards start with "n600". 

(FYI, no game developer offers any official tech support for any laptops)

The X1550 is also just an X1300, but desktop versions and laptop versions are 10-30% apart in performance, and Bioware was quite wrong to name that card as a useful minimum marker (it compares very poorly with the Geforce 7600 GT card).  The correct minimim is the X1650 Pro, and here's the X1400 Mobility next to that minimum:

www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php

Gorath
-

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 16 décembre 2009 - 06:27 .

[Dragon Slasher]

the game is awesome despite dated graphics. but why do i pull 120 fps in Modern Warfare (crappy shooter with super realistic graphics btw) during most intensive combat scenes and about 40 fps in Dragon Age's Denerim Market where there is almost nothing going on at all ?

[GHL_Soul_Reaver]

Why this post, does people lack the ability to look on the back of the box to see if the game would even run on your system?



None offense meant, but you can see the system requirements on the net as well as if going to buy the game in a store.

[Gorath Alpha]

Dragon Slasher wrote...

the game is awesome despite dated graphics. but why do i pull 120 fps in Modern Warfare (crappy shooter with super realistic graphics btw) during most intensive combat scenes and about 40 fps in Dragon Age's Denerim Market where there is almost nothing going on at all ?

This thread was created before the very first Social Forums forum had any siblings.  There was no Tech Discussion forum then.  There is one now, and although it probably should have a filter for owning / registering the game, it does not, so until it does, a thread such as this one is really not needed. 

For your own question, there probably is someone in the Tech forum who can answer,  so why not ask it there? 

G

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 16 décembre 2009 - 06:26 .