249 réponses à ce sujet

[I HAS A FLAVOUR]

If I can run this at a decent resolution/FPS I will be happy:







AMD Athlon™ 64 Processor 3500+



2.21 GHz, 2GB of Ram



Service Pack 2



GeForce 7600 GT, 256



Windows XP







Current Display Mode: 1680 x 1050

[RogueWriter3201]

The following is every bit of info I could pull up on my Rig:

          AMD Athlon™ 64 FX-62 Dual Core Processor,  MMX,  3DNow (2 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
          Memory: 1024MB RAM
          DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c 
          NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
          256.0 MB

Now, as a fine demonstration of my tech stupidity, I am a little fuzzy as to how DA:O would fair. I'd like to think ok, given that Mass Effect ran just fine at medium settings. But, for DA:O I think my RAM might be a problem. So...if anyone can shed some light.

[Neil Decurio]

Guy4142 wrote...

Neil Decurio wrote...

Intel® Core™2 Extreme Processor QX9770 OC@3.67Ghz, 4096MB Dual Channel DDR3 SDRAM OC@1333MHz, two in CrossFireX - 1GB ATI® Radeon™ HD3870 X2 (or read 4xHD3870). I think I should be set for the game. My specs are getting dated though, might upgrade at the very least my RAM and GPU soon. Perhaps I'll wait for the next batch of ATi or nVidia..

What a waste of money, could of taken a holiday!

Was obtained before any financial crisis (wich didn't hit so hard in Norway), so I could buy that rig and take a holiday, hehe. I am also a dedicated PC gamer and like playing games as they are coming out with higher settings. I forked out a little extra so that I can still nearing 2 years after buying it, have a decent system that should run most games on high quality settings (and does). I am starting to feel a bit behind on the GPU's though, although they run anything I throw at them currently just fine. I know that not before long, I assume that I will need to upgrade to a more recent GPU series though (--Probably going to wait until DX11 gets more established (and I hope it ain't such a failure like DX10)). I also got most of my PC parts cheaper knowing the importer getting them directly from asia. Anyways, it wasn't a waste of money and I was able to take a holiday 

glenboy24 wrote...

The following is every bit of info I could pull up on my Rig: 

          AMD Athlon™ 64 FX-62 Dual Core Processor,  MMX,  3DNow (2 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
          Memory: 1024MB RAM
          DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c 
          NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT
          256.0 MB 

Now, as a fine demonstration of my tech stupidity, I am a little fuzzy as to how DA:O would fair. I'd like to think ok, given that Mass Effect ran just fine at medium settings. But, for DA:O I think my RAM might be a problem. So...if anyone can shed some light.

Comparing it to the Minimal Specs announced:

• XP MINIMUM SPECS
• OS: Windows XP with SP3
• CPU: Intel Core 2(or equivalent) running at 1.4Ghz or greater
                 AMD X2(or equivalent) running at 1.8Ghz or greater
• RAM: 1GB or more
• VIDEO: ATI Radeon X850 128MB or greater
                    NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT 128MB or greater

You should end up somewhere on the Medium settings in DA:O as well I'd figure.

Modifié par Neil Decurio, 31 octobre 2009 - 02:26 .

[I HAS A FLAVOUR]

If I can run this at a decent resolution/FPS I will be happy



AMD Athlon™ 64 Processor 3500+

2.21 GHz, 2GB of Ram

Service Pack 2

GeForce 7600 GT, 256

Windows XP



Current Display Mode: 1680 x 1050

[Greekid02]

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550@1.84 32-bit OS 3GB nvidia GeForce 8400M GS

im not a techy person so i dunno, am i in trouble?

[Maugrim]

You'll be able to play Greekid02,low-med setting probably but that video card is rather subpar, if you could swing it a new $80-120 GPU could make a pretty big difference

EDIT: Oh the M that's a laptop isn't it... :/  Worse than I thought but should still be playable on lower settings

http://www.notebookr...asp?newsID=4223 that's a review of an 8400m GS laptop with regards to games should help give you an idea.

Modifié par makenzieshepard, 31 octobre 2009 - 08:04 .

[Omnistarr]

I'm running:



AMD Phenom II x2 550 @ 3.1 GHz

4GB Memory (RAM)

EVGA Nvidia GeForce 9800GTX+

WIndows 7 pro 64-bit

DirectX 11



And I should be able to run it on high with over 30FPS (should). This kind of hardware upgrade should only be about $400 from newegg.com or somewhere similar. If you're worried about performance, just try to get close to that mark and you'll be alright. Also, contrary to what most people will tell you: AMD>Intel. Why? Because you're gaming. Not rendering 3D objects and breakneck speeds =P

[flem1]

Greekid02 wrote...

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550@1.84 32-bit OS 3GB nvidia GeForce 8400M GS
im not a techy person so i dunno, am i in trouble?

Yes.  Low at best.  You have to be really careful in buying laptops.

[Urbanmech]

Intel® Core™2 Quad Q6600 Quad Core processor with VT

ATI Radeon 4890 1GB

4 GB RAM

[Joulupukkis]

Intel i7-920@3.9ghz with HT
6gb ddr3 ram
GTX260 c216 sli

I'm hoping these will do for max settings

*Edit and ofc Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit

*Edit and on the note that AMD>Intel

as long as you can afford intel it always beats amd. While amd might come close to even at gaming, as soon as you even think of doing anything else it's hands down to intel, hence Intel > AMD =P

Modifié par Joulupukkis, 31 octobre 2009 - 02:02 .

[halexh]

I hope I can run it at 2560x1600 with everything maxxed, guess it depends on what type of advanced graphic settings they have. I am unsure of them at the moment. Does anyone know?



Intel i7 920

2x BFG GTX 280 OCX in SLI

Intel X-25M G2 SSD (DA:O will be installed on this)

6 gb DDR3 triple channel memory

Dell 3008WFP

Windows 7 64 bit

[Matzoe]

So, how is the ATI Mobility 4570 worse than the 2600 or 3600? How does that make sense?
Damn, I hope I can at least run it on medium settings at a decent framerate.

[KurtenShuffle]

My computer is a bit old, about 1 and a half year old, but from what i read it should be able to handle at higher settings.

AMD Phenom 9500 QC 2.2 GHz

Nvidia Gforce 8800GT

3 gb DDR2 ram



Am i correct?

[MentalCha0s]

my ati 1950xtx can run Fallout 3 on max with 30 frames. I was really surprised by that. So by the looks of this game I should be ok with a few thing set down a peg like shadows.

[flem1]

Matzoe wrote...

So, how is the ATI Mobility 4570 worse than the 2600 or 3600? How does that make sense?

Anything that's under "6" in the hundreds digit isn't designed for gaming at all, and is likely to be junk.

Modifié par flem1, 31 octobre 2009 - 07:28 .

[flem1]

KurtenShuffle wrote...

My computer is a bit old, about 1 and a half year old, but from what i read it should be able to handle at higher settings.
AMD Phenom 9500 QC 2.2 GHz
Nvidia Gforce 8800GT
3 gb DDR2 ram

Am i correct?

yes

[flem1]

Bumped, because people are asking the same questions over and over again.

[flem1]

A data point posted in a specific query thread:

aznguyen316 wrote...



I've played about 30 min on my laptop and I think you will be fine. Here are my specs

ATI 3670 512MB DDR3 your card is a bit faster/better than mine

C2D 2.4Ghz P8600

6GB DDR3 RAM

Windows 7 64bit



Playing it at 1920x1080 resolution full screen, with textures on low and graphics setting at medium in the first area I"m getting around 38FPS according to FRAPS.



Now if I lower it to 1280x720 then it jumps to around 60-70 keeping the same settings. I prefer native screen resolution so I don't mind playing at medium settings. At 720P I could play on high or extra but the 1080P crisp resolution, IMO, makes up for the lower graphical setting. One thing though, this thing makes the laptop hot, fans 100% lol so get a good cooler. I have AS5 paste + undervolted and a cooler so my temps are down but the fans are still running.



Oh and after 30mins of game time, I can see NO WAY I could play this properly on a console.. it's like wtf how can one even enjoy this on a console if you were able to play (even at med settings) on a PC. enjoy! finally p.s. I don't want to hog the HDTV either so that's another reason I'm on PC. sorry for the long post.

[MindfieldsPT]

Running on a Clevo m570RU-U



Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 @ 2.5GHz

4GB DDR2 800MHz OCZ

GeForce 8800M GTX 512MB



Running on Window XP SP3. Hoping to pull it off on High/Max. Think it'll work? Laptop is about 2 years old.

[flem1]

High for sure, maybe not max depending on what resolution and framerate you want. That GTX is pretty much the equivalent of the desktop 8800GS.  I'll add it to the list, too...

Modifié par flem1, 02 novembre 2009 - 02:29 .

[MindfieldsPT]

I play everything at desktop resolution of 1280x1024. I like a smooth framerate. Good to hear High will work. This laptop hasn't failed me yet even after a couple of years. Might only get a good high-end desktop once SW:The Old Republic comes out.

[flem1]

I doubt TOR will push the envelope, though. It's going for *everyone* -- if they can get minimum requirements down to KOTOR levels, they probably will.

[clojordan]

Amd 64x2 dual core 3800+ 2.01ghz 3gb of ram 9800gt. Can you tell me where i stand . I don't quite understand the ghz. Some people say it is higher for some reason.

[Holy Mortar]

IntelCore 2 Duo P7350 @ 2.00 GHz
4GB
GeForce 9600m GT 512mb

I expect to run it well. Maybe not max-out, but whatevar.

Modifié par Holy Mortar, 02 novembre 2009 - 02:37 .

[medic10617]

 Intel i7 860 HT OC'd @ 3.8GHZ
Asus P7P55D Pro
 2 x XFX 4890XXX xFire (930/1000)
8GB G.Skill ripraws DDR3 2000 @ DDR3 2250
24" 1080P Viewsonic

Win 7 64bit
DX11 (even if cards aren't rated for it) 

Modifié par medic10617, 02 novembre 2009 - 02:41 .