DrGulag wrote...
As I understand the QA process, it happens before the master disk goes for replication and packaging, which is handled elsewhere. So the error occurred at the factory after the QA process was complete, and Bioware was unaware of the problem till the game was in play, as it were.
They are responsible for the product regardless of what happened. I don't care if it was the neighbours dog or Joe the Plumber burning the data into all those Blu-Ray discs. I'm not having any of that nor should the consumer care how annoying EA finds it to produce updates via Playstation Network.
I'm not saying it's annoying, but I am saying it's expensive, so Bioware/EA are going to do all they can to maximize what comes in that title update, as it's not economically viable just to spend 10,000 dollars or so for a title update that contains one thing. If anything will up the price of games, that will. Also consider that both Sony and MS have their own quality assurance testing of title updates/DLC (part of that fee), which also takes time. It's why I referred you back to the archive over RtO, since there was a lot of frank discussion about certification, how it works and why.
You screw up and you give back the cash and perhaps an added bonus. That's how it works in many other businesses, no questions asked.
Thing is, I'm unsure who handled replication, if it was inhouse EA or somewhere else. If it was the latter, it'd be EA who should get their money back since the contractor screwed up. If it's the former, then EA needs to deal with inhouse issues.
ps. I do see your point regarding the use of these forums though. When you essentially pay for a service it can be a tad annoying if someone else has the same access.
I think it's reasonable to let people voice their frustration after having to deal with all this nonsense in any case. They might be gone soon enough, not necessarily a good thing for Bioware unless they make up for it with new customers.
I have no problem with reasonable, sensible venting, and even less problem with criticism that's constructive, even if it's negative. My problem comes, as I mentioned to eno (the OP) when I've had to sort through the 100th post of one or two line varations of "this game sucks", which many times have colorful metaphors that are just immature and innappropriate. Maybe it's the mom in me, or maybe I've gotten less tolerant in my old age, but the urge to lash back at them with a "shut up" (which I know logically won't work) becomes intolerable.
I'd much rather have conversations like this, where even if people are frustrated with the level of service in dealing with issues, they can discuss it without resorting to four letter words and lousy behaviour, because that'll just continue the cycle of people lashing at each other and that does no one any good.
I think it's fair to say the majority of the people come here because we enjoy Bioware and their games most of the time, and to have fun discussing those games with other fans. And again, as I said to eno, I look forward to discussing any of Bioware's games in any forum with other players who may differ with me, but can be cogent in their arguments and don't see the best way of getting their point across as shouting at the rain,