TobiTobsen wrote...
Which we don't see. That's the problem of the presentation or what Bioware wanted us to see to give us another viewpoint after the magefriendly DAO. Somehow they had to ... ahaha "demonize" the mages. So all we get to see are (to quote somebody else here on the forum. Forgot who) Bloodmages, Abominations and Bethany 
Me!

"DA2 has taught me Kirkwall mages only come in three flavors. Blood Mage. Abomination. Bethany."
And it took me way too long to find that, I must have posted in two dozen threads today.Glorfindel709 wrote...
Meanwhile,
the story makes out to turn the Templars into demons. Mages are
threatened with sexual abuse, the "tranquil solution", and in general
being sadists. There are three named Templars who are not complete
sadists or sycophants - Keran, Thrask, and Cullen. Every other named
Templar is a mage hating sadist (or Qunari hating sadist in the case of
Varnell), and the random templars in the background are either just fine
following orders they know are wrong, or are too timid to say anything
against it. .
I don't disagree with you Glorfindel, the conflict really wasn't balanced at all.
But I wanted to point out we also have Emeric, Original Carver, Samson, arguably Wesley, the Templar recruits whose names I forget, even poor Wilmod we first meet as an abomination-- Cullen mentions he thought that he went off to visit mage friends.
Named Bad templars are Karras, Varnell, Alrik and Meredith (Who still comes off as sympathetic but insane rather than 'evil')
Compare that to Grace, Idunna, Tarohne, Decimus, Quintan, Danarius, Hadriana, Gascard, Huon, Evelina, Orsino . . . and I have a feeling I'm forgetting others.