Why I do not feel bad for Grand Cleric Elthina [SPOILERS]
#1
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 07:55
I'm on Act II of my second playthrough and I realized that last game I never talked directly to Elthina after the Dissent quest. So, I go bug her. One question I can ask her is something like "When are you gonna do something about the Qunari and mages?" Her response is that "The Chantry is like a gentle mother. Sometimes for her children to learn best they must learn themselves." (not exact quote but 90% accurate)
I'm just like... wtf, seriously?! People are killing each other. *Innocent* people are dying, and she has the power to end it simply by raising her voice... I may not be a parent, but if my children were out mudering people and deceptively ochestrating racial riots, I would not take the soft approach with them and hope they figure it out on their own.
Honestly, after that line I feel a lot less upset over her death. She may not have physically killed anyone, but there is certainly blood on her hands.
Anyone else have any thoughts?
#2
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 07:59
Also I get your point. She's as much responsible for all these people deaths than the mages and templars were, because she was so stubborn.
#3
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 08:40
I felt worse for Sebastien to be honest.
Modifié par Neesa, 29 mars 2011 - 08:41 .
#4
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 08:49
She necessarily did not have the power to end it all, but she could have at least made them stop turning harrowed mages tranquil.
Therefore I don't feel any remorse over her death.
Even if children sometimes need to learn by themselves, I don't think a child necessarily needs to know how to juggle chainsaws that way.
Modifié par Mahtisonni, 29 mars 2011 - 08:51 .
#5
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 08:55
I mean, I can see why picking sides with either Meredith or Orsino would have stepped on a lot of toes no matter the choice, but that doesn't mean she couldn't have done it. This is exactly why Anders kills her, because without her the chance for compromise has been removed. If she HAD stepped in sooner, the entire conflict could have been averted.
#6
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 08:55
On the other hand, I wish Anders didn't blow her up. I would like to drag her out of her chantry and ask her what she'd like to do now the city is in civil war. Would she like to side with the crazy blood mages or the idol-obsessed maniac templar? She'd probably opt to go back into her chantry and get blown up ...
DA3 = time to overthrough the chantry, goodbye to organised religion!
#7
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 08:56
I still don't agree with what Ander's did though, and I like Sebastian, it will be very difficult for me to make a decision when I get to the end of the game of this playthrough (didn't have The Exiled Prince on my first one)
Overall however, Grand Cleric Elthina is probably one of my very least favourite characters in the whole game. She beats even Grace and Mother Petrice, because those two I actually resented deeply
#8
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 08:56
She has the power to confine Orsino to quarters (albeit "gently"), and to tell Meredith to go away "like a good girl".
Even Cullen bemoans the fact that the Grand Cleric is making things much worse with her stance. I don't remember the direct quote but it's something in the way of "she is making everything worse with her neutral stance, giving the mages hope for a rebellion".
And that's Cullen. The same Cullen who wanted to kill all mages in the Ferelden circle just because of the off chance that they harbor a demon.
#9
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 08:58
Wulphe wrote...
I just wanted to throw this out here for discussion and see what other people thought. Not sure if there's a post about this, and if there is I'm sorry.
I'm on Act II of my second playthrough and I realized that last game I never talked directly to Elthina after the Dissent quest. So, I go bug her. One question I can ask her is something like "When are you gonna do something about the Qunari and mages?" Her response is that "The Chantry is like a gentle mother. Sometimes for her children to learn best they must learn themselves." (not exact quote but 90% accurate)
I'm just like... wtf, seriously?! People are killing each other. *Innocent* people are dying, and she has the power to end it simply by raising her voice... I may not be a parent, but if my children were out mudering people and deceptively ochestrating racial riots, I would not take the soft approach with them and hope they figure it out on their own.
Honestly, after that line I feel a lot less upset over her death. She may not have physically killed anyone, but there is certainly blood on her hands.
Anyone else have any thoughts?
Did you romance anders? If you did that is the reason why.
#10
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:19
#11
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:25
That sort of hints that the Chantry's hold over the Templars isn't as stable as you think.
#12
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:30
In the Mage/Templar affair, I think she was acting wisely. I can't see a decisive intervention on either side doing anything except sparking a rebellion. As it was, her attempts to create a compromise solution through quiet diplomacy were promising enough that Anders considered it necessary to kill her.
#13
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:30
She could have saved many lives and she didnt. I think it was 'the makers will' for her to go that way. (Hehe)
#14
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:32
I think that Elthina should have stepped in and supported the Templars more openly during the mage rebellion, but I'm sure that was done simply to give the player an opportunity to decide. After all, whereas I see the mages at fault, it's also true that the Templars were at fault. If Elthina took a side, that would only serve to instill bias in the player. Having a neutral Cleric allows both sides to seem right without a third party intervening...
What I really don't like about the character is her insistence to stay in the Chantry, even after she's warned of Anders' plot. She was way too stubborn, but I guess that's just the nature of religious leaders sometimes. She didn't seem to care about her own life one way or the other, as long as it played a part in the Maker's plan. Not the most practical approach, but she's within her rights.
#15
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:33
Cell1e wrote...
I agree with OP. I felt a little sorry for Elthina the first time it happened but on reflection it seems to me that she and the whole 'chantry/church' has totally/mostly ignored the plight of the mages and elves for years and years. I have absolutely no sympathy anymore. She was told to leave, warned and in her arrogance decided she was untouchable. I am also sure she had a good idea of the evilness of Petrice, she seemed not one bit surprised by the Petrices actions...how much more did she suspect was going on in her corrupt organisation that she did nothing about?
She could have saved many lives and she didnt. I think it was 'the makers will' for her to go that way. (Hehe)
I'll ask again did you romance anders? If so I'd say that's the reason why you don't feel sorry for the grand cleric.
#16
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:34
Too little, too late.Wulfram wrote...
As it was, her attempts to create a compromise solution through quiet diplomacy were promising enough that Anders considered it necessary to kill her.
#17
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:39
Icy Magebane wrote...
I don't know what you thought the Grand Cleric could have done about the Qunari, but the Viscount pretty much tells Hawke that he's playing nice because Kirkwall can't afford an open war. Everyone was trying to just get them to leave, and had it not been for Patrice's machinations, they might have done so. It was her involvement, trying to rally the people against the Qunari, that caused a lot of the bloodshed.
I think that Elthina should have stepped in and supported the Templars more openly during the mage rebellion, but I'm sure that was done simply to give the player an opportunity to decide. After all, whereas I see the mages at fault, it's also true that the Templars were at fault. If Elthina took a side, that would only serve to instill bias in the player. Having a neutral Cleric allows both sides to seem right without a third party intervening...
What I really don't like about the character is her insistence to stay in the Chantry, even after she's warned of Anders' plot. She was way too stubborn, but I guess that's just the nature of religious leaders sometimes. She didn't seem to care about her own life one way or the other, as long as it played a part in the Maker's plan. Not the most practical approach, but she's within her rights.
Especially since you can give her a warning three different times. Once after doing Seb's personal quest and warning her about the Divine and a possible March, the second time after Anders' quest, then sailing all the way to the Gallows to tell Cullen that Anders did something to the Chantry.
I'd hope at least she got her "flock" out of the chantry, as much as she was reluctant to leave them and go to Orlais.
But at that point, what's done is done.
Modifié par Batteries, 29 mars 2011 - 09:41 .
#18
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:44
Aramintai wrote...
Too little, too late.Wulfram wrote...
As it was, her attempts to create a compromise solution through quiet diplomacy were promising enough that Anders considered it necessary to kill her.
The impression I get is that she's been working hard behind the scenes to keep the peace between Orsino and Meredith for some time. It's just she has sense not to force an open confrontation.
#19
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:46
Wulfram wrote...
Aramintai wrote...
Too little, too late.Wulfram wrote...
As it was, her attempts to create a compromise solution through quiet diplomacy were promising enough that Anders considered it necessary to kill her.
The impression I get is that she's been working hard behind the scenes to keep the peace between Orsino and Meredith for some time. It's just she has sense not to force an open confrontation.
The fact that Orsino was going to see her just before Anders blew her up pretty much confirms this.
#20
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:49
#21
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:50
Batteries wrote...
Especially since you can give her a warning three different times. Once after doing Seb's personal quest and warning her about the Divine and a possible March, the second time after Anders' quest, then sailing all the way to the Gallows to tell Cullen that Anders did something to the Chantry.
I'd hope at least she got her "flock" out of the chantry, as much as she was reluctant to leave them and go to Orlais.
But at that point, what's done is done.
The Plan - become a martyr, ingnite the war, gather more desperate flock between the rock and a hard place.
Approved by Chantry.
It proves nothing but the fact that while she may sympathize to the mages in general, abstractly that doesn't mean she will do anything for them. Just ask the templars about it, I think it was Cullen who said that.The fact that Orsino was going to see her just before Anders blew her up pretty much confirms this.
Modifié par Aramintai, 29 mars 2011 - 10:01 .
#22
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:53
She is, quite simply, a quiet woman dedicated absolutely to her stance of passivity and neutrality. She cares for the people under her care. She cares for Kirkwall's wellbeing. She seems to believe that her purpose is to be a woman of faith, to guide by example and to trust in the Maker to make things work out. A lot of the things people criticize the Chantry for (aggressive expansion, Exalted Marches, the use of the Templars and the way mages are treated) seem to be things that are anethema to Elthina. Violence is, to her, never the answer. Force is never the answer. The most she ever gives is a stern lecture, an appeal to reason, and a healthy dose of guilt.
And she entirely exacerbates the problems in Kirkwall. Not by being a bad person. By being a very good person whose passivity results in, at best, allowing more aggressive and fanatical factions to run amok, and at worst a swiftly escalating situation that threatens repeatedly to break into armed conflict. Her refusal to use the power she does by right wield does a great deal in allowing the situation to get so very, very bad. But it is simply not within her character to use it. In another city, Denerim, perhaps, or Lothering, Elthina would have likely lived a long, long life being adored by the populace and died of old age in bed. Kirkwall, which desperately needs someone high up to step down and hammer both factions into line (or earlier, crack down hard on their own fanatics, and tell Meredith to stop running the entire freaking city), is the worst possible place for her to be.
I think demonizing Elthina does a lot of disservice to her character. If she's just a bad person, or a hypocrite, or someone worthy of being blown to bits, then the endgame decision is easy and doesn't really carry any weight whatsoever. They may as well have had Petrice be Grand Cleric. That the Grand Cleric is likeable, is a good person who, through her own inaction and attempts to follow her personal code of ethics, makes a bad situation increasingly worse, makes her murder and the conflict it sparks much, much, MUCH more intriguing. It's a deeper, and, in my opinion, better story for it.
#23
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:54
Aramintai wrote...
Batteries wrote...
Especially since you can give her a warning three different times. Once after doing Seb's personal quest and warning her about the Divine and a possible March, the second time after Anders' quest, then sailing all the way to the Gallows to tell Cullen that Anders did something to the Chantry.
I'd hope at least she got her "flock" out of the chantry, as much as she was reluctant to leave them and go to Orlais.
But at that point, what's done is done.
The Plan - become a martyr, ingnite the war, gather more desperate flock between the rock and a hard place.
Approved by Chantry.
Sounds like she and Anders had the same plan after all
#24
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:57
#25
Posté 29 mars 2011 - 09:59
"Tell my wife....hello."
Something tells me Elthina's last words would be similar.
- mrs_anomaly aime ceci





Retour en haut







