Modifié par Amyntas, 31 mars 2011 - 04:48 .
OH GOD DON'T RESTRICT US TO JUST EARTH
#51
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 04:46
#52
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 04:46
#53
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:11
I can also see the games primary hub world being grounded in earth and becoming the new citadel in this game. From which you warp to other planets from.
Or I can see the earth section being the equil of the suicide mission and perhaps the reapers have only actually attacked the UK so far. After all it seems logical to establish a base there as the inbetween to attack other Europe and America. They like to methodically attack things in order don't they?
I don't see it taking place all on earth.
#54
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:16
Razorsedge820 wrote...
Earth is very very very big and much much much bigger than Kirkwall.
I think no one is calling into question the size of earth.
The concerns, whether valid or not are more based into the fact that:
A) while earth is indeed bigger, the playable areas that we have access to explore are not going to be the size of earth. They will more likely resemble the size of kirwald's explorable areas. Or say, the citadel from ME1.
I think that's a bit closer to the mark in terms of what people are concerned with. We can see earth. Screw earth. I play Mass Effect so I can pretend i'm not living on a world where people think our president wasn't actually born in america cause they haven't each individually seen his birth certificate.
#55
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:16
then credits.
#56
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:16
SPOILERS
And I'm guessing thats where we are, since that's the place we go after we finish the arrival dlc
Modifié par Benji1306, 31 mars 2011 - 05:21 .
#57
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:33
#58
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:44
#59
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:47
cedgedc wrote...
I think that's a bit closer to the mark in terms of what people are concerned with. We can see earth. Screw earth. I play Mass Effect so I can pretend i'm not living on a world where people think our president wasn't actually born in america cause they haven't each individually seen his birth certificate.
The thing is their concerns are based on absolutely nothing. If I started posting on here "OMGZ they better not set Mass Effect 3 in London only" I would be rightly called a complete and utter idiot. Well it is just as stupid to say they are going to set the entire Mass Effect 3 game on Earth.
Yes Earth will feature in the game (a great many people have wanted that) but it is not going to be the entire focus of the game. I really do not know how anyone can see a 1 minute trailer and go "OMGZ it is totally set on Earth".
As much as I loved the ME 3 teaser trailer I am actually wishing Bioware had never released it now simply because of all the totally unfounded "concerns" and "worries" from some on the board that have come to the conclusion a 1 minute trailer = a summary of a 30 hour game.
#60
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:57
#61
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 05:57
Modifié par IRMcGhee, 31 mars 2011 - 05:58 .
#62
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 06:08
#63
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 06:16
charmingcharlie wrote...
The thing is their concerns are based on absolutely nothing. If I started posting on here "OMGZ they better not set Mass Effect 3 in London only" I would be rightly called a complete and utter idiot. Well it is just as stupid to say they are going to set the entire Mass Effect 3 game on Earth.
Yes Earth will feature in the game (a great many people have wanted that) but it is not going to be the entire focus of the game. I really do not know how anyone can see a 1 minute trailer and go "OMGZ it is totally set on Earth".
As much as I loved the ME 3 teaser trailer I am actually wishing Bioware had never released it now simply because of all the totally unfounded "concerns" and "worries" from some on the board that have come to the conclusion a 1 minute trailer = a summary of a 30 hour game.
I agree with you. I am not so much saying that I expect that will be the case as much as - I would hate it if it were.
I think the reason that people believe it will take place in large part on earth (anyone who thinks the WHOLE game will take place on earth, is dumb.) is the fact that the premise is.. the reapers are coming NOW. It's not two years to prepare, or some mysterious amount of time. They're coming right away, which implies that the plot will include something of a rush to get to earth, and that there will be a lot of fighting there.
Even if you have loads of time to go do other side quests and stuff - because it's not as though there will be a giant timer in the upper right hand corner of your screen saying 'Count down till destruction of earth/human race!'- the whole thing would feel akin to any quest you've ever played where they're all: "Get out of here before the building blows up!" - but all the while you know there's no timer, so you could go slow and open all the crates and look for hidden stuff if you wanted.
You feel pressured to rush and spend the rest of the game on earth, even if you don't necessarily have to.
I think that's a more reasonable fear, and something that seems quite plausible. I don't know if I conveyed it very well though lol.
In otherwords, you'll have to spend a large portion of the game on one planet. The rest will be optional content which only has minor effects on the plot, i.E. how many reinforcements you can call in at the big fight, or how many crew members you have to choose from.
#64
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 06:45
cedgedc wrote...
is the fact that the premise is.. the reapers are coming NOW. It's not two years to prepare, or some mysterious amount of time. They're coming right away, which implies that the plot will include something of a rush to get to earth, and that there will be a lot of fighting there.
I can't really say too much because this is a non-spoiler forum but I didn't get the impression the Reapers are coming "now". After the last DLC I get the impression we have put a fair dent in the Reapers plans. It certainly sounded to me as if good ole Harbie was a tad bit annoyed at Shepard.
cedgedc wrote... You feel pressured to rush and spend the rest of the game on earth, even if you don't necessarily have to.
I really see no basis for assuming that, if anything it will happen in a similar way to ME 2. Yes there will be a point where if you delay you will lose out in some way but I really do not think that is going to be right at the beginning of the game, it just doesn't make sense for them to do the game that way.
I mean after you visited the collector ship in ME 2 did you feel compelled to immediately race off get the IFF and then defeat the collectors ? No you didn't the actual "pressure point" didn't happen till well towards the end and you could delay that pressure point as long as you wanted.
We do not know how or when Earth features in ME 3, it could be at the beginning, middle or even the end of ME 3. We don't know if it is just Earth under attack either, for all we know the Reapers could be simultaneously attacking the Asari, Turian, Salarian and Elcor homeworlds.
At the moment all we know is that Earth will feature in some way and it will be attacked by the Reapers. Now I don't want an Earth centric Mass Effect 3, but I do want Earth to have a fairly decent place in the game it has been ignored for two games already. I just don't see why people are overly concerned that ME 3 will be nothing but Earth, it would be pretty moronic of Bioware to do that.
#65
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 06:58
I'm simply saying that if there was a reasonable fear to have for the third game, that is definitely one of them.
charmingcharlie wrote...
We do not know how or when Earth features in ME 3, it could be at the beginning, middle or even the end of ME 3. We don't know if it is just Earth under attack either, for all we know the Reapers could be simultaneously attacking the Asari, Turian, Salarian and Elcor homeworlds.
I do hope that is the case. I just don't like the idea of the reapers deciding on the fly that they just want to go after only humans, to make another giant terminator.
#66
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 09:33
#67
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 09:44
#68
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 09:45
Mr.Tacito wrote...
Ever notice, Shepard isn't even on Earth during the trailer...
Did you see what was going on down there? I'm not going anywhere near that!
#69
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 09:46
IntoTheDarkness wrote...
completley agree. this space oepra is about to be another generic 'save the earth;' crap
What planet did you want to save?
#70
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 09:57
#71
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 10:19
however in ME3 it makes absolutely no sense why shepard would only be on earth the entire game. theres no evidence of that, theres no references to that, why anyone would even think you'd be restricted to earth other than pure fear mongering and trolling is beyond me.
#72
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 10:39
Whatever666343431431654324 wrote...
IntoTheDarkness wrote...
completley agree. this space oepra is about to be another generic 'save the earth;' crap
What planet did you want to save?
I personally do not want any 'saving a planet.' - common plots.
I hope ME3 has much more complex stories resulting in unpredictable events and stories, like normandy blowing up couple times, earth becoming dusts, reapers conflicting themsevles due to virus, and etc.
Modifié par IntoTheDarkness, 31 mars 2011 - 10:42 .
#73
Posté 31 mars 2011 - 10:51
#74
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 12:43
#75
Posté 01 avril 2011 - 12:47





Retour en haut






