202 réponses à ce sujet

[Shadow Fox]

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Last I heard a gun was not powered by evil spirts whose sole purpose is to turn you into a monster and you do realize that not everyone can carry a firearm either right?

Last I heard a gun doesn't have the power to fight against or even cleanse a deadly disease-virus carried by twisted incarnations of a race.

But blood magic can.

Last I heard a gun can't control the blood flow of a person who is bleeding profusely and needs medical attention fast.

But blood magic can, as it's described to control the flow of blood.

The story that blood magic leads to an increased risk of meatball flesh suits is just that. A story. We have absolutely no way of verifying that.

The issue is that blood magic is at it's core evil and malevolent.
and using it puts  people at risk just by being near you this is  mentioned several times that even good intenioned mages can be corrupted by it.

[LobselVith8]

Blood magic isn't evil at it's core; it's responsible for the existence of the Grey Wardens and serves as the reason for the sentient races of Thedas not being eaten alive or violated by the darkspawn.

[BigEvil]

Indeed blood magic is not any more evil than any other form of magic. It is the intentions of the user and how it is used that can turn it to evil just like anything else, including Templars using torture techniques on innocent children.

Just because the Chantry teaches that blood magic is evil does not make it so, as they say similar things about all magic and mages. Such religious teachings should be taken with a heap of salt, especially since many of those teachings and teachers are a few Templars short of an Exalted March.