That's right, and as I've said, Earth is one relay jump farther from anywhere than the Arcturus Station. So, since Shepard has been committing his crimes all over the Galaxy except the Solar system, I can't see how Earth can pass up as the "nearest facility" in this "anywhere" argument.Kijin wrote...
Well, in Canada Courts-Martial can occur anywhere. And they tend to be tried in the nearest facility.
Shepard's Trial on Earth??? You must be kidding me... [with poll]
#1051
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 02:54
#1052
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 03:27
At the very beginning of the first game, the Normandy is leaving from Earth, not Arcturus Station. That should at least tell you that the Systems Alliance has some authority on Earth.
#1053
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 03:39
"A plot hole, or plothole, is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot"
#1054
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 03:49
Nashiktal wrote...
Wait what? The fact that is IS inconsistent with pre-established lore means it IS a plothole. Whether people tolerate it or not is a different matter.
"A plot hole, or plothole, is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot"
Unfortunately, Nash my friend. People seem to have difficulties accepting what are plotholes here. If they can imagine something else, apparently that negates it!
#1055
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 03:49
What Nashiltal said.Lvl20DM wrote...
This really isn't a plot-hole. You might see it as being inconsistent with the pre-established lore, but the fact that so many see it as at least plausible means it isn't a plot-hole. I hate to get caught up in semantics, but that's my take on it.
Might have something to do with the fact that Captain Anderson has some kinsfolk on Earth. Which doesn't mean Earth has any authority in the Alliance.Lvl20DM wrote...
At the very beginning of the first game, the Normandy is leaving from Earth, not Arcturus Station. That should at least tell you that the Systems Alliance has some authority on Earth.
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 12 avril 2011 - 03:50 .
#1056
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 03:55
It´s obvious that Alliance command is located on Earth. Arcturus station is only a decoy to decieve humanitys enemies.
The codex is a fabrication of Alliance propaganda and as such cannot be trusted...
/takes off hat
#1057
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 03:55
#1058
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 03:57
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Might have something to do with the fact that Captain Anderson has some kinsfolk on Earth. Which doesn't mean Earth has any authority in the Alliance.
But.. The alliance parlament is made up of the Earth Nations that created the Systems Alliance in the first place. So...yes, Earth would have athourity because they ARE the athourity.
#1059
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:05
Lol, somehow, I like this theory.Swerodent wrote...
/puts on tin foil hat
It´s obvious that Alliance command is located on Earth. Arcturus station is only a decoy to decieve humanitys enemies.
The codex is a fabrication of Alliance propaganda and as such cannot be trusted...
/takes off hat
But shouldn't the Alliance maintain the fabrication then, by having the trial where it's supposed to be held, according to it?
Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 12 avril 2011 - 04:11 .
#1060
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:06
#1061
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:06
Nashiktal wrote...
Wait what? The fact that is IS inconsistent with pre-established lore means it IS a plothole. Whether people tolerate it or not is a different matter.
"A plot hole, or plothole, is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot"
I'd be interested in seeing evidence of any lore that directly states that Alliance trials cannot be held on Earth, or that the Alliance has no bases on Earth. Or indeed that a former (or indeed current) Alliance soldier cannot be tried anywhere other than Arcturus.
Modifié par candidate88766, 12 avril 2011 - 04:08 .
#1062
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:09
Source?Avissel wrote...
But.. The alliance parlament is made up of the Earth NationsZulu_DFA wrote...
Might have something to do with the fact that Captain Anderson has some kinsfolk on Earth. Which doesn't mean Earth has any authority in the Alliance.
That was before the Alliance went rogue, and established its own government. On the Arcturus Station.Avissel wrote...
that created the Systems Alliance in the first place.
No, Earth's states are "affiliated", just like any extrasolar Alliance colony.Avissel wrote...
So...yes, Earth would have athourity because they ARE the athourity.
#1063
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:12
candidate88766 wrote...
Nashiktal wrote...
Wait what? The fact that is IS inconsistent with pre-established lore means it IS a plothole. Whether people tolerate it or not is a different matter.
"A plot hole, or plothole, is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot"
I'd be interested in seeing evidence of any lore that directly states that Alliance trials cannot be held on Earth, or that the Alliance has no bases on Earth. Or indeed that a former (or indeed current) Alliance soldier cannot be tried anywhere other than Arcturus.
There is none, because Arcturus station is the capital of the Alliance that means all trials are held there, even though nothing says that all trials are held there.
#1064
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:21
When the governments of Earth were arguing over who should deal with Shanxi and how, the Alliance stepped up and dealt with it, the popularity gained allowed them to form the Parliament and cement their place as "humanity's face" in the galaxy.
It's never implied that Earth retains no over site over them.
The Parlament would be made up of the Earth Nations and Colony/spacers.
If the Alliance had staged a coup and formed thier own goverment, it probably would have been something more like a military state than a repasentive based goverment.
Modifié par Avissel, 12 avril 2011 - 04:24 .
#1065
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:22
Almostfaceman wrote...
candidate88766 wrote...
Nashiktal wrote...
Wait what? The fact that is IS inconsistent with pre-established lore means it IS a plothole. Whether people tolerate it or not is a different matter.
"A plot hole, or plothole, is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot"
I'd be interested in seeing evidence of any lore that directly states that Alliance trials cannot be held on Earth, or that the Alliance has no bases on Earth. Or indeed that a former (or indeed current) Alliance soldier cannot be tried anywhere other than Arcturus.
There is none, because Arcturus station is the capital of the Alliance that means all trials are held there, even though nothing says that all trials are held there.
Then there is no lore incosistency here, which some people on this thread continue to use as argument. As I have stated in this thread before, I agree Arcturus may make more sense. However, given that no contradiction of lore has taken place people cannot argue that it is a plot hole.
#1066
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:24
Avissel wrote...
None of the codex entries I've read make it out that the Alliance "went rogue" from Earth.
When the governments of Earth were arguing over who should deal with Shanxi and how, the Alliance stepped up and dealt with it, the popularity gained allowed them to form the Parliament and cement their place as "humanity's face" in the galaxy.
It's never implied that Earth retains no over site over them.
I think its just that the Alliance represents, and protects, Earth and humanity in general, sort of like a more powerful version of NATO or the UN.
#1067
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:25
candidate88766 wrote...
Almostfaceman wrote...
candidate88766 wrote...
Nashiktal wrote...
Wait what? The fact that is IS inconsistent with pre-established lore means it IS a plothole. Whether people tolerate it or not is a different matter.
"A plot hole, or plothole, is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot"
I'd be interested in seeing evidence of any lore that directly states that Alliance trials cannot be held on Earth, or that the Alliance has no bases on Earth. Or indeed that a former (or indeed current) Alliance soldier cannot be tried anywhere other than Arcturus.
There is none, because Arcturus station is the capital of the Alliance that means all trials are held there, even though nothing says that all trials are held there.
Then there is no lore incosistency here, which some people on this thread continue to use as argument. As I have stated in this thread before, I agree Arcturus may make more sense. However, given that no contradiction of lore has taken place people cannot argue that it is a plot hole.
Exactly. That pretty much sums it up. Everybody here is speculating based on the evidence we do have, following their own logic.
#1068
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:27
candidate88766 wrote...
Avissel wrote...
None of the codex entries I've read make it out that the Alliance "went rogue" from Earth.
When the governments of Earth were arguing over who should deal with Shanxi and how, the Alliance stepped up and dealt with it, the popularity gained allowed them to form the Parliament and cement their place as "humanity's face" in the galaxy.
It's never implied that Earth retains no over site over them.
I think its just that the Alliance represents, and protects, Earth and humanity in general, sort of like a more powerful version of NATO or the UN.
A very powerful version of the U.N. - those individual nations cede their authority to the Alliance in all matters galactic. That's why we don't see a British representative on the citadel. All the nations have thrown in their resources for ships and such in a cooperative effort known as - The Alliance.
#1069
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:27
#1070
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:28
#1071
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:28
#1072
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:30
Almostfaceman wrote...
Exactly. That pretty much sums it up. Everybody here is speculating based on the evidence we do have, following their own logic.
I know, I just get a bit annoyed when people post their interpretation of partial evidence (we don't have all knowledge of how the legal system works in ME) as facts or proof. We all have the right to interpret the information presented in our own way, but when we don't have the full picture people shouldn't cry plot hole.
#1073
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:30
Ever since then the alliance took the mantle and became the ruling body for humanity. To the alliance, earth is a well developed "colony." if you take notice, it's an alliance leader, not earth on the council. (earth is still divided between nations of various stages of advancement.) all the diplomacy and negotiations are between the alliance officials and other species. Any ruling that the alliance makes earth has to follow. (galactic policy)
#1074
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:31
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Source?Avissel wrote...
But.. The alliance parlament is made up of the Earth NationsZulu_DFA wrote...
Might have something to do with the fact that Captain Anderson has some kinsfolk on Earth. Which doesn't mean Earth has any authority in the Alliance.
Oh, I don't know. Maybe http://masseffect.wi...m/wiki/Alliance
It's not that hard to figure something like that out.
Modifié par Someone With Mass, 12 avril 2011 - 04:31 .
#1075
Posté 12 avril 2011 - 04:31
Nashiktal wrote...
Wait what? The fact that is IS inconsistent with pre-established lore
Not what he said. He just said you see it as such.
Just pointing that out.





Retour en haut




