Aller au contenu

Photo

Merrill the Heartless - spoilers


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
377 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Bayz

Bayz
  • Members
  • 603 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

Demons (and spirits for that matter *Justice*) are like a cancer.


I don't know. I've always seen demons as liars not cancer. Dealing with them is simple; they want something and they're trying to manipulate you into getting what they want.

If you can figure out what they want then you see through the lies. Sometimes what they want and what you want line up. Sometimes you can change what they want to what you want (the Coercion check for the Redcliffe Desire Demon can change it to realizing it wants to live more than possess some child and then you force it to do what you want in exchange for its life).

I don't see them as a cancer, just NPCs that want something and are usually lying to you.


If a cancer were a sentient thing rather than a malfunction I doubt it will tell you "I kill people for the Evulz muahahhahaha" rather than "well I know it sucks but  I cannot live without doing it and better them than me"

As justice said  one of the main differences (along with the emotions they are born) between demons and te other spirits is that demons mainly want to see the motal world because they are jealous (grass is always greener in the other side, anyone?) they are no inherently evil for being evil, but because to survive they must feed on emotions of the host and it is implied (while not specified I think) that hosts end up dead. In this sense spirits are no better ("Holier than thou" can cause as much suffering as "I am so cool I must rule the world").

Is that hey need to feed on the hosts what in my understanding makes them "evil" not that they do it just because.

That said I would like to see a Twillight like film between a mage cof Antiva called "Bello" and a mormon Desire demon called "Edwina" :P

#77
Zan Mura

Zan Mura
  • Members
  • 476 messages

TobiTobsen wrote...

That demon is feasting on his desire, nothing more, nothing less, while bewitching him. If you attack her, he will attack you because he is still her thrall and she shows him things that aren't true. He isn't seeing our hero attacking a demon that corrupts him. He is seeing some bandits attacking his wife. He is living a lie, while she drains him, like the sloth demon in the camp near the dalish tried to drain you, just with another emotion. The demon in the camp used sloth, the demon in the tower love. Demons don't do things out of altruism.


Who said anything about altruism? The whole point in that is that the demon makes sense, there is no clear right or wrong answer to the issue. Yes, the demon feeds on the Templar's life force and is killing him. That much I believe is obvious. But its words about his feelings and thoughts may very well be true. It's not an altruistic act, it's purely selfish. It just so happens that the deal might be best for both involved.

I have known people who truly suffered from loneliness to the point of being borderline suicidal without anyone else even knowing. Anyone who's dealt with seriously depressed people can tell that a person can suffer extreme pain, and yet manage to hide it in a way that others are completely oblivious to it. By extreme, I mean the kind a normal person cannot even imagine, the kind that corrupts your very soul. This, in general, is what made DAO so great. The devs don't spoonfeed all the answers to you, you are free to make up your own mind. And there's a lot going on that can easily be reasoned either way.

Kartikeya wrote...

Even if she doesn't intend to do anything but hang around her Templar thrall...what happens when he's dead? You've got a demon running around the mortal realm, who was feeding off of that Templar.

What happens when you gut an abomination? How would this be any different? Assuming the fantastic thought that you don't actually kill the demons of the countless abominations and blood mages you slaughter in DAO and DA2, but that instead those spirits are left wandering and spreading evil across Thedas, was true...  then how would it make any difference either way? Yet as far as we know, when an abomination dies, the spirit is sent back to the Fade (IIRC, or it dies, whatever).

To reiterate, the point isn't that the desire demon is doing a good deed. The point is that you cannot be *sure* that killing it would be the lesser evil. Personally I think it's a little hypocritical to just up and decide for him that even a miserable truth is better than a happy lie. To me that comes off as the easy choice, the excuse someone can hide behind convincing themselves and saying "but I stood for the truth", when in reality they just destroyed what little happiness that person could have had.

It's not unlike the case of allowing evil because the law doesn't forbid it, then telling yourself over and over that there was nothing you could do, you were only following the law after all. Yet strangely enough, that doesn't help you sleep at night.

#78
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

TMA LIVE wrote...

1) It's her damgerous ambition which you support. If she died. "shurgs". That's what you want. Yet you supported the thing that got her killed, if that happened.


That still isn't "pushing" her into it.

2) Hawke made a choice because the Keeper gave him the right to do it. It was given to him to do what he thought was right. You saying it's fair to just give it to Merrill because she's saying "GIVE ME GIVE ME!"?


Except that's why you go there in the first place. What kind of friend is that wishy washy?

And no it doesn't. She fixes it anyways, without it.


At that moment to her it's the same.

#79
TMA LIVE

TMA LIVE
  • Members
  • 7 015 messages

The Angry One wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

1) It's her damgerous ambition which you support. If she died. "shurgs". That's what you want. Yet you supported the thing that got her killed, if that happened.


That still isn't "pushing" her into it.

2) Hawke made a choice because the Keeper gave him the right to do it. It was given to him to do what he thought was right. You saying it's fair to just give it to Merrill because she's saying "GIVE ME GIVE ME!"?


Except that's why you go there in the first place. What kind of friend is that wishy washy?

And no it doesn't. She fixes it anyways, without it.


At that moment to her it's the same.


1) That is pushing. If someone's cutting themselves, and you give them a knife, that's pushing them to keep going. Just keep cutting into that wrist.

2) Except you could be there to talk her out of it, and make sure she doesn't get killed. You know, like how Varric spends money to make sure Merrill doesn't get killed in the middle of her late night walks? And then tells her to stop it because it's costing him money.

3) And in the friendship version, it remains that way. I'm right, and everyone else is wrong. That's Merrill's way.

#80
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

TMA LIVE wrote...

1) That is pushing. If someone's cutting
themselves, and you give them a knife, that's pushing them to keep
going. Just keep cutting into that wrist.


What Merril is doing is risky, not deliberately self-destructive so that comparison fails.

2) Except you could be there to talk her out of it, and make sure she doesn't get killed.


Wouldn't it be better to talk her out of it without waving the item she wants in her face?

You
know, like how Varric spends money to make sure Merrill doesn't get
killed in the middle of her late night walks? And then tells her to stop
it because it's costing him money.


And yet every bandit and their cat ambushes the party at night wherever they go. Varric is full of ****.

3) And in the friendship version, it remains that way. I'm right, and everyone else is wrong. That's Merrill's way.


And does anything happen to make her feel otherwise? Marethari and (potentially) her clan destroy themselves out of fear. Which is what Merril was warning against all along.

#81
Zan Mura

Zan Mura
  • Members
  • 476 messages

The Angry One wrote...

2) Hawke made a choice because the Keeper gave him the right to do it. It was given to him to do what he thought was right. You saying it's fair to just give it to Merrill because she's saying "GIVE ME GIVE ME!"?

Except that's why you go there in the first place. What kind of friend is that wishy washy?


And more importantly, at this point Hawke knows full well that the Eluvian is something Merrill has worked on for the better part of a decade. Right or wrong, dangerous or not, this is a person's life's work we're talking about here. It carries the meaning of the death of her friend, a promise of future for her clan, and it was a big part of the reason she turned to blood magic to begin with.

While it can be argued that it's necessary to save her from it by keeping the part from Merrill, there is *no* way to try and argue that she shouldn't feel extremely betrayed by that action. Keeping the part from Merrill at that point is beyond a doubt one of the deepest companion betrayals in any BW game, with the exception of killing someone or selling them off as a slave, of course.

#82
sphinxess

sphinxess
  • Members
  • 503 messages
Dalish Elves - keepers in particular - are suppose to recover and preserve the lore of their ancestors...maybe the mistake the dalish keeper made is not teaching Merrill that she shouldn't believe anyone is expected to actually do this - instead they should react with fear anytime they find old dalish items <such as the mirror>

#83
Corker

Corker
  • Members
  • 2 766 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Of course you'll get rivalry for not giving her the tool
You, like Marethari are treating her like a child. Most people in fact don't like to be coddled or have their decisions second-guessed.
If she's wrong then so be it, again it's her mistake to make. No one else's.


I keep wondering what I'd do if my father asked me to help/defend/agree with a decision to mortgage the home he intends to retire in and burn up all his savings to please a new paramour who seemed... insincere to me.

Possibly I would be misjudging the young woman's motives and really, there's a perfectly good reason for him to be risking his financial security in this way.  But I couldn't stand back and shrug and say, "OK Dad, I'm with you on this."  And I sure as heck wouldn't cosign a new loan if he asked me to.

If he did it anyway, I wouldn't stop loving him.  But I wouldn't help him make what I'd consider a terrible mistake.

(If you don't think blood magic et al. is a terrible mistake, then obviously friendship path is the way to go.  But if you do think it's a bad idea, I don't think rivalry path is necessarily treating her 'like a child.'  It's just declining to enable her.)

#84
Torax

Torax
  • Members
  • 1 829 messages
btw Zan one of the best parts is Shale's response to the Desire Demon/Templar situation "And he accepts willingly?" which is the catch.

#85
The Angry One

The Angry One
  • Members
  • 22 246 messages

Corker wrote...

(If you don't think blood magic et al. is a terrible mistake, then obviously friendship path is the way to go.  But if you do think it's a bad idea, I don't think rivalry path is necessarily treating her 'like a child.'  It's just declining to enable her.)


Whatever you think of the situation is up to you, my point is to the others that you shouldn't complain about gaining rivalry for an action that Merril has perfect justification for not liking.

#86
Torax

Torax
  • Members
  • 1 829 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Corker wrote...

(If you don't think blood magic et al. is a terrible mistake, then obviously friendship path is the way to go.  But if you do think it's a bad idea, I don't think rivalry path is necessarily treating her 'like a child.'  It's just declining to enable her.)


Whatever you think of the situation is up to you, my point is to the others that you shouldn't complain about gaining rivalry for an action that Merril has perfect justification for not liking.


That goes without saying. If she goes "Give me that tool." and you go "No, I need to fix some tables or something.". Should probably expect some anger. Granted I bet some probably were shocked by the "Shemlen" attack.

#87
LadyJaneGrey

LadyJaneGrey
  • Members
  • 1 647 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

I'm pretty sure I never got rivalry points for accepting the blame and leaving the Dalish alive.


I have. I remembered it exactly because I thought it was hilarious that she prefers to kill her clan than accept any kind of blame. It didn't matter too much I still went pro-templar and had enough Friendship points to convince her to side with me.


I got rivalry points for taking Merrill with me into the Fade after she says "oo-I want to come!" even though her relationship was still in the middle.  I had to wonder if the system is messed up.

#88
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18 942 messages

LadyJaneGrey wrote...

I got rivalry points for taking Merrill with me into the Fade after she says "oo-I want to come!" even though her relationship was still in the middle.  I had to wonder if the system is messed up.


I think you get those rivalry points for agreeing to kill Feynriel if necessary to stop him becoming an abomination.  Which is also a bit strange, considering what she asks of Hawke in Act 3, now I think about it.

#89
LadyJaneGrey

LadyJaneGrey
  • Members
  • 1 647 messages

Wulfram wrote...

LadyJaneGrey wrote...

I got rivalry points for taking Merrill with me into the Fade after she says "oo-I want to come!" even though her relationship was still in the middle.  I had to wonder if the system is messed up.


I think you get those rivalry points for agreeing to kill Feynriel if necessary to stop him becoming an abomination.  Which is also a bit strange, considering what she asks of Hawke in Act 3, now I think about it.


So when Marethari sends the mom away, Merrill's lurking in the corner?  Eaves-dropper!

#90
Zan Mura

Zan Mura
  • Members
  • 476 messages

Wulfram wrote...

I think you get those rivalry points for agreeing to kill Feynriel if necessary to stop him becoming an abomination.  Which is also a bit strange, considering what she asks of Hawke in Act 3, now I think about it.


Also, I'm under the impression that if you're in a romance path, the romanceable companion is supposed to "lock" to either friendship or rivalry depending on which path you were pursuing when the romance flag got activated. Point being, if you're in a rivalry romance, you don't actually get friendship points and screw up the romance just by being kind to your love-interest. But similar choices if in a friendship romance would gain friendship points instead.

This is part of what's responsible that different people have experienced conflicting favor gains compared to one another.

#91
Kartikeya

Kartikeya
  • Members
  • 121 messages

Koyasha wrote...

Kartikeya wrote...

While this is true in regards to Merrill, is there really any point in the games where listening to what a demon has to say is really ever a good idea? Ever?

Anyone remember the Grand Oak?  Yeah, that was a demon, just like the sylvans.  He chose to accept his fated oaken home.  All demons aren't identical.

How about the desire demon in Connor?  She keeps her bargain, for what that's worth.  It might not be the best outcome for Connor or others, but as far as the Warden is concerned, listening to her was an entirely beneficial proposition.

The demon in the primeval thaig is pretty much entirely forthright.  He only gets upset if you try to take the treasure he considers 'his', I believe.  Although I always just let Varric give him a face full of Bianca at that point.

I think the Sloth demon in Feynriel's fade area is also straight with you.  Though I'm not sure as I haven't played through all the various options in that one.

Merrill is absolutely right in that it's worth hearing demons out and considering their offers.

As far as Merrill and Marethari go, the more I think about that the more I find it interesting.  Both of them have been somewhat wrong from the outset, but I feel as though more of the blame lies with Marethari than with Merrill.  If they had worked together to find better options, none of that would have ever happened, and it seems as though it was Marethari who was primarily to blame for everything, as she just said no and refused to listen to Merrill, consider other options, or try to find a better way.  Merrill was right - Marethari never once believed in her.  I almost detect some jealousy there too, in that Merrill was in some ways a better Keeper than Marethari. 

And I don't doubt that the pride demon was influencing Marethari far more than it was influencing Merrill.  After all, Merrill is at least willing to consider that she might be wrong, if you push her hard enough in that direction, while Marethari is a prideful stubborn old goat who kills herself rather than admit she was wrong, or even give Merrill the chance to prove her wrong.  Her actions forever deny Merrill the chance to accomplish her goals, it seems, and in some ways it feels like she does that so that, no matter what, she can never be shown to have been wrong. 

After all, if Merrill had been right and she and Hawke could have handled the demon and repaired the Eluvian, Marethari would have been proved unquestionably wrong and Merrill would have demonstrated that not only was she more capable of handling the demon, but also more dedicated to the Keeper's job of restoring and remembering ancient elven things.  It would have been clear that Merrill was better than Marethari in every way, and that was something she couldn't allow.


RE: Pride, see my above post. Does any of that ring familiar? There's a reason that between the Desire demon and the Pride demon in Feynriel's dream, it's Pride that she falls victim to, even though you'd think her Desire to help her people would be stronger.

Pride doesn't have to be chest thumping, 'I'm better than everyone else, rah rah rah' blatant. Merrill is a lonely young woman who lost two friends to what seems to be a senseless stroke of fate. She wants to make sense of it. She wants the Eluvian to be worth something because that will mean that her friends didn't die for no reason, they died helping to restore part of their history, one of the most, if not THE most important things to the Dalish. Merrill feels that it would be worth any personal sacrifice to be able to accomplish this. By the time you meet her, she's convinced that it's worth giving up her Clan for. Her Clan is wrong. She knows they are. She'll go into exile if she has to, to accomplish this great thing. It will be worth it even if they hate her forever.

She knows what she's doing. She's confident in her abilities. Anyone who questions her capability is treating her like a child and doubting her for wrongful reasons, such as an ingrained aversion to blood magic, or a failure to understand the spirits the way she does. In fact, the more people protest, the more secure in her certainty she is. Either they'll understand when she succeeds, or they won't. She knows she's doing the right thing. She's making a sacrifice for her people. (Note that this does not imply that she's WRONG about any of that. You can be perfectly right and still be prideful over it. )

She knows the dangers too, but that's okay. It's okay because she's the one putting herself in danger. She's going away from the Clan so that they're safe. She'll take on all of this risk herself. She'll make certain that it's all on her, that no one else will be hurt. She knows she can do this, because she knows what she's doing.

Do you see how insidious that is?

Let's go with your idea that Marethari was being influenced too. It wouldn't take much. Maybe she just goes up the mountain sometime before Merrill shows up, to demand the demon tell her what's really going on. I don't subscribe to the idea that Marethari's weakness would be just to show Merrill up. Marethari is an old woman who has raised Merrill since she was a young child. Sure, saying Marethari just wanted to prove her wrong makes it easier to demonize the character (since she's opposing Merrill on this), but it seems a really big step to go from 'I want to prove that girl wrong' to 'I'm totally going to die for it'.

Let's say she demands to know what's going on and the demon tells her. Maybe it's the truth, maybe it's a lie, maybe it's some combination, who knows? Doesn't matter. The demon tells her that once Merrill finishes the Eluvian, its going to come through the mirror and have fun, starting with killing Merrill. That's the plan it's had all along. It wants to be free of where it's bound. Why would it tell Marethari this if Marethari didn't care about Merrill's wellbeing? Of course she cares, she's raised Merrill. She wants Merrill to come home. She let Merrill go in the first place, in the hopes that she might give the thing up on her own. So now Marethari has a problem. She can't convince Merrill to give this up. Merrill has stopped listening to her and anyone else's warnings. Would Merrill listen to her if she told her this? She's raised Merrill. Wouldn't Merrill say that it was worth the risk? Hasn't she been saying it was worth the risk all along? Hasn't she been saying she would take the consequences if she had to? So Marethari sees two scenarios: Merrill finishes the mirror and the demon kills her, or Merrill gets possessed and the subsequent abomination will have to be killed. Either way ends with Merrill dead. Maybe no one else dead! But Merrill dead.

So Marethari finds a third option. The demon wants its freedom. She'll take the demon into herself so that Merrill and her friends can kill it. She'll die, but Merrill won't. It's a classic mother's sacrifice. Was it necessary? There's no way to know. How much was the demon lying? Who knows. Was the mirror a trap all along? I'm inclined to believe yes, but that's pure opinion. Was Marethari being influenced by the demon too? Very possibly. But I find it hard to imagine that she was remotely capable of not sacrificing herself if she truly believed Merrill would die otherwise. If your kid runs into the road, are you really going to sit up on the curb and wait to see how it all works out? It's a little weird that this makes her stupid, but Merrill's willingness to sacrifice herself for others (who, note, absolutely don't want her to make that sacrifice for them) makes her noble.

#92
Corker

Corker
  • Members
  • 2 766 messages

The Angry One wrote...

Corker wrote...

(If you don't think blood magic et al. is a terrible mistake, then obviously friendship path is the way to go.  But if you do think it's a bad idea, I don't think rivalry path is necessarily treating her 'like a child.'  It's just declining to enable her.)


Whatever you think of the situation is up to you, my point is to the others that you shouldn't complain about gaining rivalry for an action that Merril has perfect justification for not liking.


I agree.  It's entirely reasonable that she should give rivalry points in that situation, and it would be silly to complain about it.

My point is that refusing to do what Merrill wants is not necessarily  coddling or infantilizing her.  That argument appears to be deployed to make the rivalry path seem thoughtless, immature and wrong, and I don't think that's so.

#93
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

LadyJaneGrey wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

I'm pretty sure I never got rivalry points for accepting the blame and leaving the Dalish alive.


I have. I remembered it exactly because I thought it was hilarious that she prefers to kill her clan than accept any kind of blame. It didn't matter too much I still went pro-templar and had enough Friendship points to convince her to side with me.


I got rivalry points for taking Merrill with me into the Fade after she says "oo-I want to come!" even though her relationship was still in the middle.  I had to wonder if the system is messed up.


The overly anal (but I love them for it) fans that run the Dragon Age wiki had this to say about our original conversation.

New Path. Merrill does gain Rival points when you choose to blame her blood magic and thus save the clan, and friendship points for killing her whole clan.

She'd rather slay her extended family than get blamed for anything.

About the Fade quest Night Terrors does award Merrill Rivalry points for agreeing to the Keeper to put down the Dreamer. Same with Anders.

So, there you go. No glitch since it's about agreeing to kill the Dreamer if it comes to it and not accepting her into the Fade.

#94
Kartikeya

Kartikeya
  • Members
  • 121 messages

Zan Mura wrote...


Kartikeya wrote...

Even if she doesn't intend to do anything but hang around her Templar thrall...what happens when he's dead? You've got a demon running around the mortal realm, who was feeding off of that Templar.

What happens when you gut an abomination? How would this be any different? Assuming the fantastic thought that you don't actually kill the demons of the countless abominations and blood mages you slaughter in DAO and DA2, but that instead those spirits are left wandering and spreading evil across Thedas, was true...  then how would it make any difference either way? Yet as far as we know, when an abomination dies, the spirit is sent back to the Fade (IIRC, or it dies, whatever).

To reiterate, the point isn't that the desire demon is doing a good deed. The point is that you cannot be *sure* that killing it would be the lesser evil. Personally I think it's a little hypocritical to just up and decide for him that even a miserable truth is better than a happy lie. To me that comes off as the easy choice, the excuse someone can hide behind convincing themselves and saying "but I stood for the truth", when in reality they just destroyed what little happiness that person could have had.

It's not unlike the case of allowing evil because the law doesn't forbid it, then telling yourself over and over that there was nothing you could do, you were only following the law after all. Yet strangely enough, that doesn't help you sleep at night.


I'm not arguing whether or not it's better for this guy. I'm merely pointing out that she's basically being the spiritual equivalent of a parasite. She WILL kill him. She will go on and do the same thing to other people. She's not being harmless here.

It's different because he's not an abomination. She's not inside him, she hasn't merged with him. She's standing right there, in the mortal realm, having a chat with you. Presumably one of the blood mages summoned her up and then got splattered. The Templar certainly didn't summon her into the mortal realm, and there aren't great gaping portals in the Circle tower for her to have stepped through.

My argument was 'when is it ever a good idea to stop and chat with a demon'? I mean, keep in mind, if she didn't already have a friend, she'd be trying to coerce you into something similar.

EDIT: And in fact, this exact thing does happen to you and all your friends like, a few doors down when you run into Sloth.

Modifié par Kartikeya, 01 avril 2011 - 12:44 .


#95
ginzaen

ginzaen
  • Members
  • 122 messages
Why did i care? the dalish hate humans anyhow and they attacked first so got what they deserved.

#96
Bayz

Bayz
  • Members
  • 603 messages
Ain' no racist but they got it comin' *spits tobacco*

Still I agree. I am more a "Shut up elf!" than "Let's make an civilized argument about why and why not". Specially after meeting Zathrian.

#97
Rifneno

Rifneno
  • Members
  • 11 979 messages

Filament wrote...

Rifneno wrote...

But is there a way to go where you tell her she's so stupid that the Chantry should declare it an official miracle that she survived past age 12 without ever picking up a black mamba and going "this poor cat is so skinny!"?  Because that's the path I want.  The biggest plot hole isn't dead characters appearing or timeline errors, it's the fact Darwinism didn't claim Merrill in about 20 years living in forests full of poisonous flora and deadly predators.  No, seriously, Merrill is beyond belief.  You want to tell me that all the bad mages are slitting their wrists and using their blood for mana everyday without dropping dead from blood loss?  Fine, I'll accept that.  You want me to believe a fully grown adult who doesn't own 3 buckets for drool thinks that a mugging is a "welcome to the neighborhood" greeting?  No, I do not accept that!

*deep breath*  /nerdrage off.


The urban jungle is an entirely different beast than the jungle jungle.


That it is, and I thought that was her problem at first.  It's not.  I exaggerate for comedic effect of course, but I do believe the part about it not being realistic that she even survived childhood.  No matter what society you're raised in, you can't think that a mugging is a "welcoming" ceremony and that no one likes you because they haven't violently beaten and robbed you.  Simple animals that don't understand concepts like 1+1=2 or that they aren't really invisible if they stick their head under the couch can understand violence and hostility perfectly.  How does Merrill not?

And it's not like she's even passable in her native society.  She's a pariah for a reason.  She stubbornly refuses anyone else's teachings and claims she knows better for no apparent reason.  She's like one of those annoying teenagers that insists they know absolutely everything about everything and everyone else is an idiot - except taken to an extreme that I can't even describe.  While the cat line may have been a joke, it would be completely in-character for her to attempt to handle a dangerous animal while other Dalish watch in horror and scream warnings to her while she calmly replies, "No it's okay, I know how to handle these."  Which of course ends in a Darwin Award.

#98
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

Bayz wrote...

Ain' no racist but they got it comin' *spits tobacco*

Still I agree. I am more a "Shut up elf!" than "Let's make an civilized argument about why and why not". Specially after meeting Zathrian.


Hey, Zathrian's a good man who let his rage control him.

Man lost his daughter to humans and he did something terrible; it was pure vengence. I understand where that man came from. It was wrong, and two wrongs don't make a right, but it was understandable.

#99
Bayz

Bayz
  • Members
  • 603 messages
Nay he was right to do it to the guys who did it. Not to their sons and wives and generations and generations and generations...if it were once would have agreed with him, the only flaw I get on his reasoning is the necessity of keep it going (that and that it might be related also with his extended lifetime being connected with the curse)

Modifié par Bayz, 01 avril 2011 - 01:04 .


#100
The Baconer

The Baconer
  • Members
  • 5 676 messages
And now we have Merrill apologists. Marvelous.