TMA LIVE wrote...
Gisle Aune wrote...
Getting friendship is not always by doing the right thing.
The keeper is to be blamed IMO, since she took the blow for Merrill, when we could have just fought it like another boss creature, since we fight at least 2 other of those demons in the game.
I keep hearing this, but there's no proof of that. For all you know, the Pride needs to possess something first before it can be fought. And the last time Merrill went up against a Pride Demon, she gave and in tried to kill Hawke.
Everyone gives in. The only person who doesn't is Anders. It's essentially mandatory so we can have a mini-quest where the companion apologizes for giving in to the respective demon. I personally find it OOC for some of the characters involved, and I only use rivals like Fenris and Isabella because it loses immersion to see characters like Aveline or Varric betray me regardless of what their status is.
TMA LIVE wrote...
1) It's her damgerous ambition which you support. If she died. "shurgs". That's what you want. Yet you supported the thing that got her killed, if that happened.
You mean, the same way that Merrill supports the dangerous ambitions of Hawke every time he brings her along on a dangerous mission, like when he wants to go into the Deep Roads so he can get rich?
TMA LIVE wrote...
2) Hawke made a choice because the Keeper gave him the right to do it. It was given to him to do what he thought was right. You saying it's fair to just give it to Merrill because she's saying "GIVE ME GIVE ME!"?
Because Merrill specifically asked for the tool, and Marethari was supposed to hand it to Merrill according to their rules.
The Baconer wrote...
And now we have Merrill apologists. Marvelous.
I hear this every time someone doesn't think Loghain is a black-hat wearing villain or argues that Morrigan isn't evil incarnate. Why does a different opinion mean an apologist to you?





Retour en haut





