Avalla'ch wrote...
I'm talking about what occurs in the game, optional or not. Not Geralt as a character.
And if they released a game with a female protagonist where most of the
male population is not only treated like garbage for "gritty realism"
but there for titilation and pornographic card collection, you would
have a point.
Though I admit CD projekt pulled off the "inmature jerk" when portraying some girls, it still doesn't mean they hold some grudge againts females at all.
My problem is with people who have entitlement complexes.
People who think they can push private individuals around by hitting them with a 'Bigot' stick.
Hell, I'd have no problem personally playing a game with a female narrative, women showing off in marketing and so forth if I liked the game. However, I'm not going to screech at the top of my lungs that they're being misandrist for getting rid of all the males, and that my genitalia gives me the divine glory to demand you develop and market games to my liking because I deserve it.
TL;DR: I don't see why they couldn't use the female protagonist, but if they don't want to, that's the way things go. I'm not going to go nuts about it and call in the sexist remarks or make up gazillions of accusations.
And By the way: Thinking of girls only as Objects seems disgusting enough to me and yes, that's maybe the only thing I didn't like in TW1.
And addendum: Now since we speak about hating the other gender, is Tomb Raider misandrist too?





Retour en haut





