Aller au contenu

Photo

Was Anders Justified (No Pun intended)


1927 réponses à ce sujet

#351
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

IanPolaris wrote...
DG,

There are other codex entries (specifically dealing with the Rite of Annulment) that clearly state that that the Grand Cleric (not any Templar parallel rank but the GRAND CLERIC) is the only one that has the authority to issue a Rite of Annulment. 


"Divine Galatea, responding to the catastrophe in Nevarra and hoping to prevent further incidents, granted all the Grand Clerics of the Chantry the power to purge a Circle entirely if they rule it irredeemable. This Rite of Annulment has been performed 17 times in the last 700 years.
--From Of Fires, Circles, and Templars: A History of Magic in the Chantry, by Sister Petrine, Chantry scholar."


Where does it say that only Grand Clerics can invoke the Rite? Where does it say that a KC can't in the case of emergency when a Grand Cleric is assassinated?

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 03 avril 2011 - 07:36 .


#352
Oneiropolos

Oneiropolos
  • Members
  • 316 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

David Gaider wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...
You are contradicing this codex entry:

http://dragonage.wik...antry_Hierarchy

It clearly talks about the Clerical Chain of command from top to bottom, and guess what?  There isn't a Knight Commander listed anywhere.  This is of course no suprise since the Chantry restricts the Cleric to women only (at least with any authority) in honor of Andraste and many Templars (including Knight Commanders) are men.

The Templar has (by your own blog entries regarding them) their own parallel chain of command subservient to the Chantry headed by the Knight Vigilant.

Yes, you can retcon your own game, but  based on the game lore, Meridith's action was illegal (and so were a lot of her actions in Acts 2 and 3) as you well know (and Grand Cleric Elthina did nothing about them).


Right.

And where in that codex entry does it say who commands the Circle of Magi? Or who holds the authority to invoke the Rite of Annulment? It talks about the heirarchy of the Chantry itself, which the templars are not part of but rather adjacent to.

You are drawing inferences that are not explicitly stated, and deciding they are facts. Then, when I tell you there's more to it than that, you say I'm contradicting something you yourself decided. You're wrong. Please deal with it.


DG,

There are other codex entries (specifically dealing with the Rite of Annulment) that clearly state that that the Grand Cleric (not any Templar parallel rank but the GRAND CLERIC) is the only one that has the authority to issue a Rite of Annulment.  Since you can't tell me where KC Meridith falls in the Chantry Chain of Command (and you admit that she doesn't), then you are contradicting your own game lore....and common sense.

Let me ask you this:  If a KC can do whatever they like (as long as they can remove the Grand Cleric first), then are there any meaningful checks to Templar power at all?

I don't think so.

-Polaris


...holy marches on cities aren't deterrents now? Gosh. I thought the threat of getting wiped out was ALWAYS a meaningful check. Clearly I'm just not courageous enough. 

#353
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Oneiropolos wrote...
...holy marches on cities aren't deterrents now? Gosh. I thought the threat of getting wiped out was ALWAYS a meaningful check. Clearly I'm just not courageous enough. 


Better than that. Cut off their lyrium supply. That's the whole point of making them addicted to it.

#354
Namuri

Namuri
  • Members
  • 216 messages
I sort of agree with Polaris about Tranquils being close to slaves, or, at the very least, very, wrong. It isn't right to take away someone's emotions. Emotions are what drives people to do anything, hopes, dreams, tranquils don't have those. You can't say that they aren't sort of messed up, all Tranquils (as long as they aren't in a weird situation where the fade has been opened, or whatever) will always be content being Tranquil, which makes sense, obviously. But this clashes majorly with the fact that (I'm assuming) pretty much all mages are terrified of becoming Tranquil. Or, rather, the thought of being a Tranquil is horrifying to them. And yet, no matter how horrifying they might find it, should they become Tranquil, they are perfectly fine with it as a Tranquil.
That just... it's not right.
(this obviously doesn't apply so much to people who choose to become Tranquil)

At the same time however, you have to think about the fact that (when done the legal way) people are made Tranquil to save their lives. Tranquils are people who weren't going to pass the Harrowing, and if you don't pass the Harrowing, you die, since you'll turn into an abomination. Tranquils are people who the Enchanters are very sure couldn't survive as mages, and would be a danger to themselves and others. As far as I understand, turning someone tranquil (in the legal way) is not a discision made lightly, and it is a discision made by other mages.
I suppose this paragraph is a little of topic. But I think it's important, since this you need to understand what Tranquils are... No matter how they may be treated, they were made that way not for someone elses gain, but to keep them from harming others.
I'm not saying it's right. But it's nessacary, and really what are the Tranquils supposed to do afterwards? Sit around and do nothing?

Now, as to the main topic of this thread 8D;

I don't think Anders was justified in the least for blowing up the Chantry. He did it to incite a war, because he was insane with vengence, not so much that he even thought there'd be compromise. He just wanted the establishment that he felt had ruined his life harmed in some way. If mages (could) benefit from it, I really feel like that was just a plus. Anders is not selfless, he does what he does to try and make up for what he's done before. And then, because he went insane he says there was no compromise.
And he is wrong.
The is always compromise. But compromise is hard, compromise is difficult. It means trying to find a middle ground with someone with a view point completely different from yours, and that is probably one of the hardest things to do, as a human. It's far easier to demonize the other side, to say they are dellusion or foolish, because they don't agree with you, rather than to realise that you might be wrong, if only in part. It's even harder when you're a freaking abomination, thirsting for vengeance.
Actually, that is when it's pretty much impossible.
I think he was a coward, and deeply, deeply hypocritical. He demonized all Templars, basically, even though many of them seemed like decent people who were just doing their job, not trying to be malicious towards mages. It's the system that's broken, not so much the people running it. It's hating the players rather than the game itself. Which I think is an important distinction.

Personally, I think what he wanted (mages with the same freedoms as everyone else) is a fairy tale. Mages are dangerous. More then other people, since they can set stuff on fire with their minds. But they're dangerous because they're people, more than because they're mages. People have issues, and when the person with issues and problems can conjure lighting with a thought, there's going to be a problem.
However, considering how Thedas is, you could say the same for anyone skilled with a bow, or a sword, or daggers. Or, hell, anyone at all. Thedas isn't like modern day, death is far, far more prevalent (obviously), and more easily executed (pardon the pun).
But just because mages are dangerous doesn't mean you should lock them away, as I said, these are people, and while they should require more scrutiny than most due to the whole being able to turn into an abomination thing, they deserve freedom. Keeping it from them is wrong, and will have ramifications, has had already, really.
One big thing, though, that I think is really important, is that while mages can be extremely dangerous, they can also be ridiculously helpful. I mean, as much as I dislike Anders, he's able to help so many people (until he goes crazy, obviously). Mages can heal wounds in moments, or at least hours. The can take away disease and cure deformities.
They are frikkin ~*~Magic~*~
And locking up deprives so many people of their abilities. That's also wrong.

I feel like I've wandered off topic again, so I might as well jump off the deep end with my idea of a compromise:

It's been shown - with Fenryel (probably spelled that wrong) and the Arl's son... Connor, I think it was? - that people who don't get training as mages tend to...umm...cause problems.
So, the Circle which - among other things - teaches mages to control their gift, is very important. However instead of a prison, it should be... like... a boarding school, or just a school in general. Something that people can come and go from more freely, to visit family, have a life. They'd be required to go, but not forced to stay all the time. Really, I think this would lead to much more emotionally healthy individuals, and while I think Tranquils might still be nessacary, I don't think they would be as common, because the mages would have a bigger reason to pass. And the people should have a choice - if the other mages think they won't make it - of becoming tranquil or undergoing the harrowing anyway.
And yes, this would mean that mages who fail the harrowing would die.
I said this was a compromise, after all.
But if they pass the Harrowing, they should be allowed to leave the Circle, for good if they want, and do what they wish, since they've proven themselves above becoming abominations.
Blood mages would be apostates, however, as would people found to be consorting with demons. And the templars would hunt /them/
I think this would be a better way for magic to serve man, right now it just sort of sits there, doing nothing, or setting mans building on fire.
Or exploding them, that happens too.

I know it's not perfect, obviously, but it's better than what Meredith and Orisino (GDI ORSINO, I  LIKED YOU ) had.

edit: HOLY CRAP THIS IS LONG! Sorry! :unsure:

Modifié par Namuri, 03 avril 2011 - 07:38 .


#355
Darth Krytie

Darth Krytie
  • Members
  • 2 128 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

DG,

There are other codex entries (specifically dealing with the Rite of Annulment) that clearly state that that the Grand Cleric (not any Templar parallel rank but the GRAND CLERIC) is the only one that has the authority to issue a Rite of Annulment.  Since you can't tell me where KC Meridith falls in the Chantry Chain of Command (and you admit that she doesn't), then you are contradicting your own game lore....and common sense.

Let me ask you this:  If a KC can do whatever they like (as long as they can remove the Grand Cleric first), then are there any meaningful checks to Templar power at all?

I don't think so.

-Polaris


The Rite of Annulment codex entry was written by a historian discussing how it came about. It's not a law journal. It doesn't need to include what happens in extreme circumstances and who would do it should the primary person not be able to.

#356
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

So I'm the elected delegate of the pro-mage side now?


Correct.

#357
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Shadow of Light Dragon wrote...

You missed David's edit, Ian. He added that there's no Codex that says what happens when a Grand Cleric dies ;)


Doesn't matter.  Templars by DG's own admission aren't in the Chantry Clergy Chain of Command.  Meridith is not the Grand Cleric and since she isn't in the chain of command, clerical authority doesn't fall to her unless DG wasn't to obviate existing lore.  Chains of command exist for a reason...especially with the Divine certainly has the power to authorize a Rite of Annulment and she isn't further way (in time) than the Grand Cleric of Denerum as in relation to KC Gregoire.

-Polaris

#358
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Vormaerin wrote...

Better than what?  Give me a what or you have no argument.  Could a better system exist? Yes.  Is it likely?  I wouldn't think so, but there's a lot going on that we aren't aware of.


The Circles seem to have emancipated themselves. I don't see why the mages couldn't develop a better system. Why does it have to be Chantry domination or anarchy? 

Vormaerin wrote...

Besides, what makes you certain mages aren't cursed?  The ability to go insane pretty much guaranteed unless carefully trained not to is not exactly a blessing in most peoples' minds.


My ability not to condemn all mages for the actions of some.

#359
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages
It needed to happen b/c the representative of the Chantry was trying to remain neutral in a matter that involved two of the Chantry's own institutions....

Modifié par jlb524, 03 avril 2011 - 07:41 .


#360
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Oneiropolos wrote...

...holy marches on cities aren't deterrents now? Gosh. I thought the threat of getting wiped out was ALWAYS a meaningful check. Clearly I'm just not courageous enough. 


For a Knight Commander, no.  Without her Templars, an Exalted March is about as threatening as a wet firecracker.  The Chantry depends on it's templars to lead/organize exalted marches (at least per the codex entries).

-Polaris

#361
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Shadow of Light Dragon wrote...

You missed David's edit, Ian. He added that there's no Codex that says what happens when a Grand Cleric dies ;)


Doesn't matter.  Templars by DG's own admission aren't in the Chantry Clergy Chain of Command.  Meridith is not the Grand Cleric and since she isn't in the chain of command, clerical authority doesn't fall to her unless DG wasn't to obviate existing lore.  Chains of command exist for a reason...especially with the Divine certainly has the power to authorize a Rite of Annulment and she isn't further way (in time) than the Grand Cleric of Denerum as in relation to KC Gregoire.

-Polaris


And so you are saying that if mages kill the Grand Cleric and probably the senior mothers and sisters along with her (probably what happened whern Anders blew up the chantry), the KC has to send word back to Orlais, which will take months, to recieve the ok?

Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 03 avril 2011 - 07:42 .


#362
Darth Krytie

Darth Krytie
  • Members
  • 2 128 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Shadow of Light Dragon wrote...

You missed David's edit, Ian. He added that there's no Codex that says what happens when a Grand Cleric dies ;)


Doesn't matter.  Templars by DG's own admission aren't in the Chantry Clergy Chain of Command.  Meridith is not the Grand Cleric and since she isn't in the chain of command, clerical authority doesn't fall to her unless DG wasn't to obviate existing lore.  Chains of command exist for a reason...especially with the Divine certainly has the power to authorize a Rite of Annulment and she isn't further way (in time) than the Grand Cleric of Denerum as in relation to KC Gregoire.

-Polaris


Well, if you won't listen to sound arguments and fair reasoning,  then it's because he said so. Christ on a ******. In this argument, spoiler alert, he wins. Every time. Let it go.

#363
sphinxess

sphinxess
  • Members
  • 503 messages
Call it assuming emergency powers during war then - many battles have been fought where the general has been killed and the second on command can't be reached in time to make command decisions. Meredith is doing this - if the chantry decides she was wrong they can spank her later

#364
Vormaerin

Vormaerin
  • Members
  • 1 582 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Except in this case he is.  DG just admitted that the Templars have their own parallel chain of command subservient to the Chantry.  Since it takes a member of the Clergy (specifically the Grand Cleric) to authorize a Rite of Annulment and since Templars don't fall into that chan of command (as I've shown) Meridith's acts were illegal.  She does that a lot actually.

-Polaris


*sigh*  No, what you have proven is that Meredith would not preside over the holy communion day or whatever.   The Circle of Magi is not a church.  It doesn't have a priestess governing it.   Its governed in parallel to the churches.  The Grand Cleric has authority over all subsidiaries...  lesser chantries and Circle Towers.  

Nowhere does it say that Knight Commander is the senior subordinate to the Grand Cleric.  It doesn't mention Circle governance or Templars at all, actually.   You are right, though, a Knight Commander would not hold a parish according to that Codex.

#365
Mnemnosyne

Mnemnosyne
  • Members
  • 859 messages

Namuri wrote...

At the same time however, you have to think about the fact that (when done the legal way) people are made Tranquil to save their lives. Tranquils are people who weren't going to pass the Harrowing, and if you don't pass the Harrowing, you die, since you'll turn into an abomination. Tranquils are people who the Enchanters are very sure couldn't survive as mages, and would be a danger to themselves and others. As far as I understand, turning someone tranquil (in the legal way) is not a discision made lightly, and it is a discision made by other mages.

Um, no.  They also do it to mages who they think are going to be trouble.  See: Jowan.  Everyone seemed to think he was ready for the Harrowing, but they were going to tranquil him because they suspected he might be using blood magic (keep in mind they had no proof at that point).  Irving also says something along the lines of 'if it were up to me it might be different' so it's also not a decision made by other mages, it's made by the templars.

#366
AlexXIV

AlexXIV
  • Members
  • 10 670 messages
I am sorry but what would be the driving factor for creativity if not emotions? Obviously renegade mages lose their desire to be free if made tranquil. Desire is an emotion. Also I am sure most reasearch and scientists are motivated by some sort of desire, inspiration or aspiration. I would like to know examples for when it to be creative is a logical choice. Is it a logical choice to become a story writer is it an emotional choice I wonder.

Can tranquil love, can they care? What is the difference between a human and a machine? That one is made of metal and one of flesh and blood? I am sorry to say that but reading this I can only say that Bioware/DA need at least one psychologist, physicist and a sociologist to support the writing team. Because you are not only inventing a new world, you also invent a new moral code. So whatever templars do is right because the story writer wants it to be so, and the world will bend around this even if it breaks common sense.

If I am wrong I would really like to see examples and links to prove that. Because this is a major concern for me.

Also about the chain of command, legality and justification. So are we now assuming that it is legal, if your supoeriour dies, to do how you please? That you can for example can commit murder? Because you have nobody above you? Is there no law above templars, which for example says in which situations they may annull a circle? Or can they just go 'Oh I reached the end of the chain, now I can annull them. Let's.' That means if you were becomming president of the USA you could just decide to ... get rid of a minority that bothers you?

You know if you look at national sozialist germany there were alot of laws which made it perfectly legal what Hitler and his guys did. I am sorry but if you live in a society that is based on injust laws, then it is your duty to rebel, as much as it is your duty to defend your society if it is based on just laws.

Modifié par AlexXIV, 03 avril 2011 - 07:53 .


#367
Camenae

Camenae
  • Members
  • 825 messages
Oh well, there will always be people who insist that Tolkien INTENDED for LOTR to be an allegory, even though Tolkien said in his own foreword to his own novels that he DID NOT INTEND for LOTR to be an allegory.

If someone thinks they're right, they will think they're right and all else be damned. I hope someone like that isn't ever elected to a judgeship or anything, because I would hate to practice before one of those.

#368
Aldandil

Aldandil
  • Members
  • 411 messages

IanPolaris wrote...
DG,

There are other codex entries (specifically dealing with the Rite of Annulment) that clearly state that that the Grand Cleric (not any Templar parallel rank but the GRAND CLERIC) is the only one that has the authority to issue a Rite of Annulment.  Since you can't tell me where KC Meridith falls in the Chantry Chain of Command (and you admit that she doesn't), then you are contradicting your own game lore....and common sense.

Let me ask you this:  If a KC can do whatever they like (as long as they can remove the Grand Cleric first), then are there any meaningful checks to Templar power at all?

I don't think so.

-Polaris

Based on DA2 I think we can safely say that there aren't any meaningful checks to Templar power, regardless of whether they have the right to perform the Rite of Annulment or not. There also appear to be no meaningful checks to the power of nobility in Orlais, of Magisters in Tevinter or to the Assassins in Antiva. In non-democratic countries, there rarely are meaningful checks to power, and we're looking at a non-democratic world. The fact that there actually are laws within the templar order leaves them one step ahead of most institutions.

IanPolaris wrote...
Doesn't matter.  Templars by DG's own admission aren't in the
Chantry Clergy Chain of Command.  Meridith is not the Grand Cleric and
since she isn't in the chain of command, clerical authority doesn't fall
to her unless DG wasn't to obviate existing lore.  Chains of command
exist for a reason...especially with the Divine certainly has the power
to authorize a Rite of Annulment and she isn't further way (in time)
than the Grand Cleric of Denerum as in relation to KC Gregoire.

-Polaris

As DG said, your basis for this is not in any in-game source but in conclusions you have made from unrelated facts. There is no existing lore for what happens with the rie of annulment when a GC dies, except for what David Gaider just said.

#369
Namuri

Namuri
  • Members
  • 216 messages

Koyasha wrote...

Namuri wrote...

At the same time however, you have to think about the fact that (when done the legal way) people are made Tranquil to save their lives. Tranquils are people who weren't going to pass the Harrowing, and if you don't pass the Harrowing, you die, since you'll turn into an abomination. Tranquils are people who the Enchanters are very sure couldn't survive as mages, and would be a danger to themselves and others. As far as I understand, turning someone tranquil (in the legal way) is not a discision made lightly, and it is a discision made by other mages.

Um, no.  They also do it to mages who they think are going to be trouble.  See: Jowan.  Everyone seemed to think he was ready for the Harrowing, but they were going to tranquil him because they suspected he might be using blood magic (keep in mind they had no proof at that point).  Irving also says something along the lines of 'if it were up to me it might be different' so it's also not a decision made by other mages, it's made by the templars.


I'm pretty sure they just didn't think he'd pass the Harrowing.
And it isn't? Well crap. I thought it was.

#370
David Gaider

David Gaider
  • BioWare Employees
  • 4 514 messages

IanPolaris wrote...
There are other codex entries (specifically dealing with the Rite of Annulment) that clearly state that that the Grand Cleric (not any Templar parallel rank but the GRAND CLERIC) is the only one that has the authority to issue a Rite of Annulment.  Since you can't tell me where KC Meridith falls in the Chantry Chain of Command (and you admit that she doesn't), then you are contradicting your own game lore....and common sense.


Perhaps you mean dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Codex_entry:_The_Rite_of_Annulment?

The one that says Grand Clerics have the authority to issue a Rite of Annulment, but which doesn't say what happens when a Grand Cleric dies? Or what rights a Knight-Commander possesses? And there is no "chain of command"-- that codex defined the heirarchy of a religious order, not a military unit. A religious order that is part of a fantasy world, and one where "common sense" -- especially the brand you've been peddling -- need not apply.

Let me ask you this:  If a KC can do whatever they like (as long as they can remove the Grand Cleric first), then are there any meaningful checks to Templar power at all?

I don't think so.


I'm sorry, am I in the position of defending the templars, now? You're going to sit there with your arms crossed because the fanfic you got going in your head makes more sense to you? To answer your question: yes, I imagine in a theoretical world if a Knight-Commander could conspire to remove a Grand Cleric, and also keep any clear successor from manifesting, they would be able to do as they please with the Circle of Magi-- subject to scrutiny once the Divine got wind of it, no doubt. Or does the possibility of political scheming make no sense to you? Shall I go into the intricacies of authority between the Grand Clerics and the Divine, as well? Or did the fact such things are not all explicitly laid out mean you've decided how it works already?

If you wish to ask for clarification, do so. Otherwise, I'd suggest you maintain the notion that you are speculating, and basing at least part of that speculation on the opinions of in-world characters (vis a vis the codex or not). You are free to draw what judgements from that you wish-- whether it be that the templars are a horribly corrupt organization or what have you. We have intentionally left that part of the page blank.

Enjoy.

#371
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

IanPolaris wrote...

Shadow of Light Dragon wrote...

You missed David's edit, Ian. He added that there's no Codex that says what happens when a Grand Cleric dies ;)


Doesn't matter.  Templars by DG's own admission aren't in the Chantry Clergy Chain of Command.  Meridith is not the Grand Cleric and since she isn't in the chain of command, clerical authority doesn't fall to her unless DG wasn't to obviate existing lore.  Chains of command exist for a reason...especially with the Divine certainly has the power to authorize a Rite of Annulment and she isn't further way (in time) than the Grand Cleric of Denerum as in relation to KC Gregoire.

-Polaris


And so you are saying that if mages kill the Grand Cleric and probably the senior mothers and sisters along with her (probably what happened whern Anders blew up the chantry), the KC has to send word back to Orlais, which will take months, to recieve the ok?



Exactly right.  There is no evidence that even if the circle were totally corrupted (and even Cullen admits it's not) that simply locking up the mages and hiding the key wouldn't work.  After all the situation (as Cullen himself admits) was far more dire in Fereldan and Gregoire was willing to wait (abeit uneasily and with forboding).  The Grey Warden's arrival gave Gregoire a legal loophole and he used it (and rightfully so).  There is nothng that happened in Kirkwell that screams "emergency", we must annull the circle now (unlike Fereldan).

-Polaris

#372
Oneiropolos

Oneiropolos
  • Members
  • 316 messages

Darth Krytie wrote...

Well, if you won't listen to sound arguments and fair reasoning,  then it's because he said so. Christ on a ******. In this argument, spoiler alert, he wins. Every time. Let it go.


...can I quote the end of that in my sig if I attribute you properly? I love it. :D

#373
Vormaerin

Vormaerin
  • Members
  • 1 582 messages

AlexXIV wrote...

If I am wrong I would really like to see examples and links to prove that. Because this is a major concern for me.


The point is that the Tranquil mage is still intelligent and still has free will.  He just has little incentive to use it.   If a templar told my mage to go make a magic gewgaw for his girlfriend, I might say  "nah, I'd rather take a nap for fun"  (at least, in a legally administered circle).

The Tranquil mage would consider it dispassionately, determine he has no other tasks to occupy his time and likely agree.  But he could say no if he had an intellectual reason to do so.

#374
Shadow of Light Dragon

Shadow of Light Dragon
  • Members
  • 5 179 messages

IanPolaris wrote...

Shadow of Light Dragon wrote...

You missed David's edit, Ian. He added that there's no Codex that says what happens when a Grand Cleric dies ;)


Doesn't matter.  Templars by DG's own admission aren't in the Chantry Clergy Chain of Command.  Meridith is not the Grand Cleric and since she isn't in the chain of command, clerical authority doesn't fall to her unless DG wasn't to obviate existing lore.  Chains of command exist for a reason...especially with the Divine certainly has the power to authorize a Rite of Annulment and she isn't further way (in time) than the Grand Cleric of Denerum as in relation to KC Gregoire.

-Polaris


*sigh* I fail to see how Meredith calling for the RoA goes against existing lore. There is nothing to say she can't. All you are going by is a Codex entry saying that in the 83rd year of the Glory Age, Grand Clerics were given the authority to purge a Circle.

Some of us thought this implied ONLY Grand Clerics had the authority, and David Gaider has said this train of thought is incorrect.

So get over it. He's not contradicting lore in this instance.

#375
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

David Gaider wrote...

If you wish to ask for clarification, do so. Otherwise, I'd suggest you maintain the notion that you are speculating, and basing at least part of that speculation on the opinions of in-world characters (vis a vis the codex or not). You are free to draw what judgements from that you wish-- whether it be that the templars are a horribly corrupt organization or what have you. We have intentionally left that part of the page blank.

Enjoy.


Maybe we should take the opportunity to ask David Gaider why Leliana seemed to take such a harsh view of magic and mages as Sister Nightingale since the thread derailed from the topic of Anders being Justified?

Modifié par LobselVith8, 03 avril 2011 - 07:52 .