Darth Krytie wrote...
Upsettingshorts wrote...
Darth Krytie wrote...
Actually, intent is a huge part of terrorism. The intent being to gain what one wants by use of fear and intimidation.
Definition: the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes.
...I'm really going to explain this again.
I'm talking about the ultimate motives for engaging in the act in the first place, not the immediate intent behind utilizing that method.
So of course that is the intent, it's always the intent. That doesn't change.
It's the same intent whether you're a revolutionary trying to free the mages or a Pan-Nationalist Islamic fundamentalist trying to expand a Holy War.
The tactic itself is different than the cause it is used in support of. And as you pointed out, the intent to inspire fear beign the goal of terrorism is correct - and is the reason why Cerberus is not a terrorist organization, because that has never been their intent.
Was it Anders' inent to cause fear or intimidation? Or was it to shock people into acting? (Note: I am not discussing my own personal feelings on anyone's actions...just debating what his motives were and what he perceived his actions to cause)
I believe his intent was to remove the cahnce that the situation would be resolved peacefully so that things would just go back to the way they were, by removing the Chantry he made it so the mages and templars finally had to act.





Retour en haut




