Aller au contenu

Photo

Was Anders Justified (No Pun intended)


1927 réponses à ce sujet

#1451
Deztyn

Deztyn
  • Members
  • 885 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Deztyn wrote...

Yes, the warden can learn a lot of things from a book. How to duel from a book. How to be a ranger from a book. How to be a templar from a book. How to be an assassin from a book. How to be a reaver from a book.

And the best part is... it's instantaneous!


Jowan seemed to have learned blood magic from books, too, which is why Irving had them removed from the library.


But what kind of book? Was it 'How to Gain Unlimited Power in Three Pints or Less'? Was it 'How to a Trick a Demon into Teaching You a Forbidden School of Magic Without Selling Your Soul'? Was it a book of magic? Or a magical book?

#1452
KnightofPhoenix

KnightofPhoenix
  • Members
  • 21 527 messages

Deztyn wrote...
But what kind of book? Was it 'How to Gain Unlimited Power in Three Pints or Less'? Was it 'How to a Trick a Demon into Teaching You a Forbidden School of Magic Without Selling Your Soul'? Was it a book of magic? Or a magical book?


I wager it's a book with nice illustrations like this

Posted Image

#1453
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Deztyn wrote...

But what kind of book? Was it 'How to Gain Unlimited Power in Three Pints or Less'? Was it 'How to a Trick a Demon into Teaching You a Forbidden School of Magic Without Selling Your Soul'? Was it a book of magic? Or a magical book?


It was a series of books, actually, and Anders line about Merrill possibly learning how to use blood magic from her own blood indicates a demon isn't necessary to learn how to use blood instead of mana as a source of magical power.

#1454
Deztyn

Deztyn
  • Members
  • 885 messages
@KoP :lol::lol::lol:


@LobselVith8

1) It's Anders! Trust Nothing!

2) Anders says that learning blood magic requires you to look a demon in the eye and accept his deal.

3) It's Anders! Trust Nothing!

Modifié par Deztyn, 08 avril 2011 - 05:29 .


#1455
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages
I could use that KoP illustration as my Chewbacca Defense.

Anders admits blood magic doesn't necessarily come from a demon by his line of questioning to Merrill:

Anders: So, when you first did blood magic, it was... just an accident, right?
Anders: You cut yourself and realized the power? You didn't actually deal with a demon?
Merrill: Oh, no. I did.
Anders: Why would you do that?

Modifié par LobselVith8, 08 avril 2011 - 05:38 .


#1456
Deztyn

Deztyn
  • Members
  • 885 messages
You seem to have missed points 1 and 3. :huh:

Ah, well. I don't remember that banter, but I don't think your quote proves what you think it proves. Going by the text it seems like Anders trying to rationalize how a girl like Merrill could be a blood mage. Not professing a sincere belief in the ability to learn blood magic by accidental cutting.

Modifié par Deztyn, 08 avril 2011 - 06:08 .


#1457
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Deztyn wrote...

You seem to have missed points 1 and 3. :huh: 


Apostate Hawke keeps points 1 and 3 in mind when Anders tells him Merrill doesn't love him.

Deztyn wrote...

Ah, well. I don't remember that banter, but I don't think your quote proves what you think it proves. Going by the text it seems like Anders trying to rationalize how a girl like Merrill could be a blood mage. Not professing a sincere belief in the ability to learn blood magic by accidental cutting.


Anders is asking if Merrill learned blood magic without dealing with a demon; if it wasn't possible, Merrill would have addressed this as a response instead of admitting that she dealt with Audacity.

#1458
Deztyn

Deztyn
  • Members
  • 885 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Anders is asking if Merrill learned blood magic without dealing with a demon; if it wasn't possible, Merrill would have addressed this as a response instead of admitting that she dealt with Audacity.


Well, that's your interpretation. Which assumes that it was honest and informed speculation from Anders. Assumes that both Anders and Merrill would know for certain what's possible. And also assumes that if Merrill did know it was impossible that she would respond with, 'Don't be silly you know there's only one way to learn blood magic! From a demon! I learned from a demon! Because that is the only way that blood magic can be learned!" and not "Oh, no. I did."

In another Act I banter Anders says, "to use blood magic you must look a demon in the eye and accept his offer" He's explicitly stating that learning blood magic requires a deal with a demon. He's not guessing or questioning. If you want to believe that Anders is lying or mistaken in one case but not the other go ahead. He lies. He's wrong. It happens often enough in game. But don't try to use him to prove your point.

Modifié par Deztyn, 08 avril 2011 - 07:10 .


#1459
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

to use In another Act I banter Anders says, "to use blood magic you must look a demon in the eye and accept his offer"


I don't think that was ever a banter.


EDIT: Never mind, it was between Anders and Fenris. Nevertheless, just because you see him as a mad abomination and choose not to believe him on anything doesn't mean other people have to follow your way of thinking.

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 08 avril 2011 - 08:56 .


#1460
demonpig

demonpig
  • Members
  • 17 messages
i would have forgave him but he killed Grand Cleric Elthina and many defenceless people that bastard something had to change but he could have blown up the templar hedquaters that would have worked the same mabey even better to demoralise the templars or he could have killed merideth shown the mages that they could have won without killing innocents and the mages would not have had to resort to blood magic, but it worked (kind of) i can see what he tried to do but he had many better choices

Modifié par demonpig, 08 avril 2011 - 10:01 .


#1461
tiernanls

tiernanls
  • Members
  • 43 messages

Koyasha wrote...

tiernanls wrote...

i have come accross the only thing that qualifies one way or the other in proof of at least where blood magic originates.

second
sentence of the description of the blood mage specialization when
choosing a specialization in dragon age origins. word for word :
"originally learned from demons".

not thought to be, or
assumed. just "originally learned from demons". this isnt a codex
entry mind you. this is the games own description of a blood mage and
blood magic. now im sure this will be attempted to be spun a million
ways, but bottom line is blood magic was learned from demons according
to the game writers. any argument against is really just writing your
own sub-fantasy.

so we can keep arguing against whether or not a
demon is actually required to use blood magic, which i woudl say no it
isnt. but i think this should settle at least the one thing. blood
magic is from demons. now if you can look at any category of demon and
say to yourself "not inherently evil", than i would just say that your
moral compass is clearly pointing in the opposite direction of the
person you are arguing against. its an impossible argument. there is
no way to win.

as far as im concerned demons represent a fade
manifestation of the evil that is in every being. a human is not
inherently evil but he has the capability of evil. the demons are those
evil emotions and thoughts in a pure manifestation. they are
inherently evil to me. and any magic that was learned from demons
should be considered inherently evil. at the very least, im sure the
great majority of every citizen of thedas whether they are mage or not
would agree. including anders. so supporting the use of blood magic is
a losing battle one way or the other.

That question has already been covered in the fact that there is other information which claims that it was first taught to the ancient Tevinter magisters by the Old God, Dumat. There is no way to know which of these origins is true, if either of them.

You're also far off-base about the nature of demons - both demons and spirits are both the same 'species' of entity that exists in the Fade, and the distinctions between them are purely based on what they have chosen to focus on. What's classified as 'demons' in Thedas are not inherently evil, just as 'spirits' are not inherently good. The emotions that demons choose to focus on, however, are far easier to go overboard on and become evil, and given the one-dimensional nature of both spirits and demons, this means that most demons are evil, but it's not a requirement.

Now, from an in-character perspective, most characters do see demons and such as evil, because that is the prevailing thought in Thedas, but from an objective viewpoint, they are not always so.


its not debatable.  the info youre using is codex entries.  codex entries are essentially jsut stories you find.  the info im using is actual game description.  it has nothing to do with the lore.  youre selecting a spec, you hover over teh blood magic spec and word for word "originally learned from demons".  its not a story.  its the spec description.  you can argue till youre blue in the face about any of this but the bottom line is that the game designers write the world.  they say blood magic was learned from demons.  book should be closed on that topic. 

and as far as what really constitutes a demon its really as simple as the game designers there as well.  when youre attacking a desire demon it doesnt say "desire".  its says "desire DEMON" so on and so forth for all of them.  this is consistent throughout the games.  just like how when youre in the mage origin and you encounter a spirit of valor it doesnt say "valor demon" or even "valor spirit".  it just says "valor".  same with justice in the fade in awakenings.  so you can go round and round with this argument all you want.  any logical person would just go with what the game designers and writers are obvioulsy telling us. 

after that the whole "inherently evil" argument is just silly imo when it comes to demons.  once you accept the games defnition of what demons are, you can pretty much see that they are all the "bad" or "evil" emotions.  pride, desire, rage, sloth, etc, etc. 

bottom line is blood magic= bad.  you just sound liek a walking talking real life iteration of jowan.  without exception every person who uses blood magic in the dragon age world ends up causing somethign bad out of selfishness with the one and ONLY exception of the player themselves.  and really... we all just know thats because the game for some insane reason doesnt recognize youre even using blood magic in any of the titles. 

#1462
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.


So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.

#1463
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.


So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.


An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time. Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel. That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it whether the mage wanted it or not (usually because they can't fight back against it). Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 08 avril 2011 - 11:58 .


#1464
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.


So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.


An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time. Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel. That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it. Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.

Actually, if you pursue a Rivalry, a key scene with Anders has him admitting that Justice is taking over him more often, and he's losing control and having blackouts where he doesn't remember what he's done.

Pursuing a friendship (especially a friendship romance) seems to imply that Hawke helps Anders maintain focus, and actually keeps him stable.

#1465
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.


So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.


An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time. Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel. That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it. Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.

Actually, if you pursue a Rivalry, a key scene with Anders has him admitting that Justice is taking over him more often, and he's losing control and having blackouts where he doesn't remember what he's done.

Pursuing a friendship (especially a friendship romance) seems to imply that Hawke helps Anders maintain focus, and actually keeps him stable.


Rivalry makes Justice take over more because Anders rethinks his whole revolution ideas. Justice forcibly takes over and makes Anders black out. Rivalry makes Anders act more as himself, not as a combination of Justice and Anders.

Friendship makes them merge more, think the same way, and makes him merge with Justice as one. Which does help him maintain focus, but at the cost of Anders now being JustAnders even more so.

#1466
Aldandil

Aldandil
  • Members
  • 411 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.


So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.


An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time. Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel. That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it. Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.

I think you should set up a continuum for demonic possession, with Wynne in one end and generic mindless monster abomination in the other, and place anyone possessed along this line. Then you can draw a line somewhere and decide that that is when you're not only possessed by a spirit, but an abomination. Everyone along that continuum will still be possessed, though, so I'm not sure if the arbitrary border is enlightening.

#1467
Herr Uhl

Herr Uhl
  • Members
  • 13 465 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.


An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time. Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel. That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it whether the mage wanted it or not (usually because they can't fight back against it). Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.


He did accept it fully. That is the point of being possessed. Justice asked if they'd merge, and Anders said yes. He even states this himself, repeadetly. Even if it is an uneven portrayal, where he at one time can separate his and Justice's thoughts, and the next they are one and the same.

I just don't like the argument that he is completely sane and reasonable, except when he isn't.

Edit: Also, that means that Uldred was completely reasonable, as he wasn't the one being mad or cruel, it was the demon.

Modifié par Herr Uhl, 08 avril 2011 - 12:07 .


#1468
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

Aldandil wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.


So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.


An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time. Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel. That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it. Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.

I think you should set up a continuum for demonic possession, with Wynne in one end and generic mindless monster abomination in the other, and place anyone possessed along this line. Then you can draw a line somewhere and decide that that is when you're not only possessed by a spirit, but an abomination. Everyone along that continuum will still be possessed, though, so I'm not sure if the arbitrary border is enlightening.


The idea of whether Anders is truly an Abomination seems very grey to me. Looking at notable people who have had spirits/demons within them gives off

  • Wynne - completely sane, madness free, and sugary sweet about people.
  • Uldred - Blood mage who went bat**** crazy, got possessed by a Pride Demon, and merged as one
  • Marethari - sacrificed her life to protect Merrill's by letting the demon possess her, yet retained enough control of herself to have a final moment with Merrill before the battle
  • Evelina - a woman who had kind intentions, but became possessed and changed into a psychotic lunatic Abomination
  • Anders - arguably the most difficult to rightly pinpoint into Abomination or Weird guy with a few quirky and eccentric habits.
to name a few anyway.

#1469
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

Herr Uhl wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.


An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time. Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel. That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it whether the mage wanted it or not (usually because they can't fight back against it). Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.


He did accept it fully. That is the point of being possessed. Justice asked if they'd merge, and Anders said yes. He even states this himself, repeadetly. Even if it is an uneven portrayal, where he at one time can separate his and Justice's thoughts, and the next they are one and the same.

I just don't like the argument that he is completely sane and reasonable, except when he isn't.

Edit: Also, that means that Uldred was completely reasonable, as he wasn't the one being mad or cruel, it was the demon.


Did I say he was completely sane and reasonable? Uh.... NO. Now you're putting words in my mouth because if you look I never once said anything of the sort. I also said COMPLETELY and UTTERLY merged as one. Meaning more than just a "Oh hey there let's merge". The Abomination is ONE force. Not two separate ones within the same body.

And Uldred and Anders are completely different items, so don't even begin to try and compare them.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 08 avril 2011 - 12:15 .


#1470
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 684 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Herr Uhl wrote...

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.


So he is only mad and cruel sometimes? That makes it all better then.


An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time.

Says who? Connor? Sloth-Fenryiel?

Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel.

I'm sure mage girl who got stabbed in the chest for disagreeing would agree.

That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it whether the mage wanted it or not (usually because they can't fight back against it). Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.

An abomination is a matter of composition, the merging of a Fade Being and soul, not of intent and action. A sloth abomination that doesn't actively hurt others is still an abomination.

#1471
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

I said...

An Abomination is mad and cruel all the time.


Says who? Connor? Sloth-Fenryiel?


Gee I don't know, the woman who's lived in a mage tower that studied all things magic. The person I mentioned right above you, but for purposes now will quote again. Also, I'd like to see if Sloth-Feynriel doesn't hurt anyone. Is there a video? If so please direct me to it. Because just what he does in one scene doesn't mean it's what he'll do his whole existence. Plus if he said "I won't hurt anyone", you're trusting a demon. Which is stupid.

Wynne says "it is madness and cruelty that defines an Abomination." Anders isn't mad or cruel. Justice is in certain scenes, which is different.. And even in Awakening Justice was as zealous as he is now, but he didn't know how to act outside the Fade.


It defines their very nature of being.



Anders isn't even the one being mad and cruel.

I'm sure mage girl who got stabbed in the chest for disagreeing would agree.


I'm sure if you actually watched that scene you'll see that it was Justice acting that way, NOT Anders.

That's an entirely different facet of his persona, namely Justice. An abomination is when a demon/spirit and mage have completely and utterly merged as one, accepting it whether the mage wanted it or not (usually because they can't fight back against it). Anders hasn't accepted it completely. Of course, his friendship path seems to lead him to merge more.


An abomination is a matter of composition, the merging of a Fade Being and soul, not of intent and action. A sloth abomination that doesn't actively hurt others is still an abomination.


And there is absolutely nothing to say that an Abomination is only an Abomination based off of composition where intent has nothing to do with it. Composition is only one part of it.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 08 avril 2011 - 12:55 .


#1472
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

tiernanls wrote...

its not debatable.  the info youre using is codex entries.  codex entries are essentially jsut stories you find.  the info im using is actual game description. 


People have addressed that game descriptions can be wrong, since a few people during DA:O addressed that the game description said Reaver came from demons when the information was from the blood of a wyvern. Read the summary for specialization:

"Demonic spirits teach more than blood magic. Reavers terrorize their enemies, feast upon the souls of their slain opponents to heal their own flesh, and can unleash a blood frenzy that makes them more powerful as they come nearer to their own deaths."

Since the Reaver specialization comes from the blood of a dragon (wyvern), the game descriptions shouldn't be used as indisputable fact, especially when the summary for the templar specialization for DA2 and it's reference to lyrium appears to contradict Alistair's ability to use templar abilities in DA:O.

tiernanls wrote...

and as far as what really constitutes a demon its really as simple as the game designers there as well.  when youre attacking a desire demon it doesnt say "desire".  its says "desire DEMON" so on and so forth for all of them.  this is consistent throughout the games. 


I take it you never heard Anders explain how the distinction is Andrastian?

Anders: Maybe you don't really understand the difference between spirits and demons.

Merrill: Did I ask you?

Anders: Spirits were the first children of the Maker, but He turned his back on them to dote on His mortal creations.

Anders: The ones who resented this became demons, driven to take everything mortals had and gain back the Maker's favor.

Merrill: Your "Maker" is a story you humans use to explain the world.

Merrill: We have our own stories. I don't need to borrow yours.

tiernanls wrote...

bottom line is blood magic= bad. 


That's your opinion, and you're certainly entitled to it.

#1473
Rifneno

Rifneno
  • Members
  • 12 076 messages

Deztyn wrote...

But what kind of book? Was it 'How to Gain Unlimited Power in Three Pints or Less'? Was it 'How to a Trick a Demon into Teaching You a Forbidden School of Magic Without Selling Your Soul'? Was it a book of magic? Or a magical book?


Or a book like the ones we buy in stores to get most specializations in DAO?

demonpig wrote...

i would have forgave him but he killed Grand Cleric Elthina and many defenceless people that bastard something had to change but he could have blown up the templar hedquaters that would have worked the same mabey even better to demoralise the templars or he could have killed merideth shown the mages that they could have won without killing innocents and the mages would not have had to resort to blood magic, but it worked (kind of) i can see what he tried to do but he had many better choices


I disagree.  Firstly, if you're trying to free some allies in a prison, you don't blow up the prison.  That kills them too.  Also, blowing up the Chantry will arguably be more likely to sway public opinion for the mages.  I know that sounds ridiculous at first but hear me out.  If Anders blew up a bunch of templars and the mages escaped, everyone would just freak out at a bunch of possibly blood mages on the loose.  If he blows up the Chantry, Meredith will invoke the Right of Annulment (he can't know this for certain, but it's the highly likely scenario) and the mages along with Hawke's crew most likely, will have to fight the attacking templars.  By letting Meredith have power to invoke the RoA he has shown the world the templar's true colors.

Or simply put, his blowing up the Chantry allows the templars to still be viewed as the bad guys because they're trying to kill hundreds or thousands of people, even children, for something one man that wasn't even among them did.  If he blew up the templars in the Gallows, even if he could do so without killing the mages, then the templars would come out looking like the victims.  The public would be solidly behind the templars in that case.  In this case, while much of the public is still brainwashed by the Chantry's fearmongering, a lot of them will also go "they tried to annul the circle because of one apostate?  what the hell?"

He even realizes it's pretty much evil when you get right down to it.  He just feels, and I agree, that there will be far less suffering in the long run by forcing the fight for freedom now than letting the tyranny continue.  He doesn't want to die to be a martyr so another generation of suicide bombers will scream his name as they attack civilians, instead he accepts death as a punishment for killing innocent people even if it was for the greater good.  Justice is twisted by his anger, but his sense of honor is not totally destroyed despite what the "omg terrorist!" crowd paints him as.

tiernanls wrote...

and as far as what really constitutes a demon its really as simple as the game designers there as well.  when youre attacking a desire demon it doesnt say "desire".  its says "desire DEMON" so on and so forth for all of them.  this is consistent throughout the games.  just like how when youre in the mage origin and you encounter a spirit of valor it doesnt say "valor demon" or even "valor spirit".  it just says "valor".  same with justice in the fade in awakenings.  so you can go round and round with this argument all you want.  any logical person would just go with what the game designers and writers are obvioulsy telling us. 


Very well put.  I'm surprised how many people are buying the whole "demons and spirits aren't any different" thing because Merrill says so.  They're galaxies apart.

without exception every person who uses blood magic in the dragon age world ends up causing somethign bad out of selfishness with the one and ONLY exception of the player themselves. 


I don't know about that... Avernus didn't have selfish goals.  He did a lot of bad, certainly not going to deny that.  His goals were selfless though.  He did extend his own life with blood magic, but he was doing so with experiments he intends to use to help the entire Grey Warden order.  I'm sure there are many other Wardens who use blood magic selflessly; the entire order flatly refuses to condemn it and says "if it helps us kill darkspawn, it's cool with us."  Merrill's goals weren't selfish either.  She wanted better for her people even if it meant her own death.  She was mindblowingly stupid about it, but she wasn't out for personal gain.  Or Alain.  I guess you could call it selfish because he didn't want to be raped in prison anymore, but I think he certainly qualifies as a good guy.  The only reason we even know for sure he knows blood magic is because it was the only way to wake Carver/Bethany/whomever.

#1474
Sad Dragon

Sad Dragon
  • Members
  • 560 messages
Slightly off-topic:

In regards to Wynne -- We do not know the conditions of her merging. If I recall correctly she even states that the spirit sacrificed itself for her, fueling her lifeforce with its own. How that would effect the ability of the spirit to imprint itself in her personality we do not know. The fact that it is, according to Wynne, getting weaker may also be a factor.
We also do not know what kind of spirit it was, which would no doubt have an impact on how much we would be able to tell her apart from the spirit should it have merged with her personality.

As for if she is an abomination or not -- as i recall it it was the warden who said that an abomination is the madness, she herself could not say if she was an abomination or not. The way I remember it, it was said more as a kindness in a way to assure her that she wasn't like Uldred, there where no facts involved only an opinion from the PC.

Vengence on the other hand is no longer Anders. Anders have been long gone and his view on things changed since the merge. That much we do know.

Is he an abomination? Yes, in the strictest terms he is -- but so is Wynne.
Is he one of the cruel and mad kind? The cruel bit I'm not sure about but he is mad, and vengence is not a force of good but one of personal vendetta.

- The Sad Dragon

#1475
CaimDark

CaimDark
  • Members
  • 148 messages
Anders is a selfish bastard that should burn in hell, or even better, spend the rest of eternity alone in a cell being "taken care of" by a bunch of Sir Alrik's clones WITHOUT the mercy of tranquility. He did not do it for the cause of mages, he did it for himself. If he cared half as much about the plight of mages as he constantly claims he would never even presume to have the right to decide how they should live and how they should die. Isn't that kinda what his hated templars do?