Beerfish wrote...
IanPolaris wrote...
It's not. Templars no matter how high ranking are not allowed to unilaterially declare a rite of anullment. That is a deliberate check and balance by the Chantry to keep the Templars by abusing this most absolute final solution. KC Gregoire explains it quite well in DAO as does Wynne. Meridith's actions were blatently illegal. The problem is that other than the Champion, no one has the stones to call her on it (and hasn't for over a decade...the last Viscount that tried to call Meridith in on her illegal actions wound up with a serious case of dead and that's long before the idol). The templars for the most part are just as frightened of her as the mages.
If you talk with Knight Captain Cullen (if you side with the Templars), he openly admits that he has dire doubts about the necessity and legality of Meridith's actions, but there is no one for him to turn to.
-Polaris
So, after the chantry was blown up by Anders the templars are not allowed to invoke annulment?
Also you will have to point out to me where is says they cannot invoke annulment? They had to ask for it in DAO but I never saw the rule sheet that says they can't do it under certain circumstances.
Gregoire says it in DAO and Wynne concurs. Templars are a parallel order within the Chantry. Templars do not and never have had the unilateral authority to declare a rite of annulement. They are given extensive latitude short of that. Knight Captain Cullen (hardly a friend of mages) openly questions both the necessity and legality of the Rite in this case, and if Cullen questions it, then you know that Meridith has gone over the deep end.
This is done in part to prevent the Templars from coercing and coopting the mages as an army to take over the Chantry.
-Polaris





Retour en haut




