Are Bioware "slaves" to the Hardcore market?
#1
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 09:03
This time has been an even bigger fail, it's created a core of people who feel betrayed and have made things personal. Whether these people will continue to pick appart future releases, is up for debate. But It's put Bioware on the radar in a negative way. It reminds me a little of what our PM said some time back about people getting used to to voting Conservative. This time it's the reverse, people are getting used to giving it to a mediocre Bioware game with both barrels, it may be the start of a trend.
If Bioware loses the hardcore market to Witcher et al. Will they become another Westwood ? What led to Westwoods decline was trying to mix genres at EA's behest, it was a failed experiment. Westwood was closed after a couple of mediocre buggy releases.
Other franchises have managed to continue while adding to what was already there , rather than trying to pander to a nebulous market that may not even exist. Maybe Bioware should look at what those games have done rather than experiment in a time of uncertain finances.
#2
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 09:25
#3
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 09:26
#4
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 09:43
Maconbar wrote...
TOR will likely determine BW's fate.
Then the're doomed. TOR will fail, mark my words. To the OP, BW aren't 'slaves' to the hardcore market but they do have a solid core of fans who specifically like BG, ID and DA:O kind of games. Since no other company really makes those (Atari) fans go crazy when BW starts to move away from those kind of games.
#5
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 09:50
What happened to taloring for an audence? It's not like even the most money grabing exec would tack on wire work in to a nature program for that WOW factor (but now that I think about it they would if they could get away with it.
#6
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 09:52
#7
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 09:52
Guest_simfamUP_*
daemon1129 wrote...
What Dragon Age 2 failed at, I can guarantee you ME3 will save Bioware's arse...
I am worried for ME. They have a short development time too. Look at ME and ME2 2007-10 this is 2010-11 :-/
#8
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:01
#9
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:09
Maconbar wrote...
TOR will likely determine BW's fate.
No, that will decide Bioware Austin' fate, EA owns Bioware so there is no fate to decide, really, unless EA chooses to drop the name which is doubtful at this juncture.
#10
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:14
simfamSP wrote...
daemon1129 wrote...
What Dragon Age 2 failed at, I can guarantee you ME3 will save Bioware's arse...
I am worried for ME. They have a short development time too. Look at ME and ME2 2007-10 this is 2010-11 :-/
I don't think you should be worried that much. Dates can always change. Plus ME2 was released in January 2010 and they probably started working on the game when they finished.
#11
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:20
#12
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:22
#13
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:24
simfamSP wrote...
daemon1129 wrote...
What Dragon Age 2 failed at, I can guarantee you ME3 will save Bioware's arse...
I am worried for ME. They have a short development time too. Look at ME and ME2 2007-10 this is 2010-11 :-/
A sequel to a GOTY and a shooter at the same? Fail in today's market? No way. With the name itself, ME3 first week is enough to cover expenses (with such short development time), and I doubt the game will fail that bad to have weak sales. Most major review sites will give ME3 at least 8.5 regardless of actual quality.
#14
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:29
#15
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:35
aksoileau wrote...
No, the hardcore fanbase has a sense of entitlement that really doesn't exist.
That, and like I stated in the Lowtown version of this topic, if there is a real niche market then someone will step in and make games for that market. Who cares what the company logo on the box is as long as you get the game you want?
#16
Posté 02 avril 2011 - 10:47
So, basically, it's the worst of two worlds.
#17
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:16
Then one day Bioware decides to drop making sour dough bread and instead focus on making croissants.
This instantly disappoints the sour dough lovers, but they accept grumblingly.
Then when people try the croissants, they realize they still have a tinge of sour dough but without the wholesome goodness that comes with it. They also aren't very good as croissants, because who wants sour croissants?
#18
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:24
DungeonLord wrote...
Imagine Bioware is a baker and it makes some of the finest sour dough bread in the land. Everyone loves their sour dough bread and they've won several awards for it.
Then one day Bioware decides to drop making sour dough bread and instead focus on making croissants.
This instantly disappoints the sour dough lovers, but they accept grumblingly.
Then when people try the croissants, they realize they still have a tinge of sour dough but without the wholesome goodness that comes with it. They also aren't very good as croissants, because who wants sour croissants?
I'd have included a weevil bit to that story.
#19
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:26
#20
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:37
However the title of the thread is something to consider. Perhaps this is Bioware making the game they want to make, maybe its their goal to make a game that melds the old with the new. Or maybe its just their intention to make 30 hour cinematic storys. Their supposed dependency on the "hardcore" market might just be whats is crushing their soul. They couldn't come out and say "we don't make games for xxx group," so its something to consider. With that though, i will say for a game that is supposed to be cinematic or appeal to a different crowd than the hardcore; it failed miserably and in epic fashion. Company identities can change, but it takes years and can be painful. Perhaps this is bioware changing their identity.
#21
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:47
#22
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 01:10
Modifié par TheJist, 03 avril 2011 - 01:13 .
#23
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 01:31
They should just say so. I am Ok with that. I will see than, if there other RPG Games out there, more to my liking.
#24
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 01:32
MDarwin wrote...
I think it is completely up to BW, where they wanna go with the DA Franchise. Not to us "Fans". Don't get me wrong, I do not like the "RPG Style" of DA2. But if BW feels they have to go down the DA2 Style, so be it.
They should just say so. I am Ok with that. I will see than, if there other RPG Games out there, more to my liking.
Thats the thing though, they would be shooting themselves in the foot if they did such a thing because if they are shifting brand identity then they will want to carry over as much of the fanbase as they can so as to add it to their "new" one.
#25
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 01:36





Retour en haut






