No. It's just saarebas are dangerous by nature. Decades of teaching can't fix that. In fact, saarebas are leashed because decades of teaching can't make them possession-proof.The Angry One wrote...
So decades of teaching under the Qun cannot possibly overcome one day of life among bas Saarebas he may not even have come in direct contact with.
Concession that the Qun is a weak and fragile philosophy accepted.
Five good reasons to embrace the Qun.
#101
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:23
#102
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:24
The Angry One wrote...
Erm, no. Remember what Sten said? A person is born into their role, it is a fact of life. They can no more change it than they can their race or the colour of their hair (the Qunari don't know what dye is, you see).
If you're gonna embrace the Qun you should at least know what it really is.
Here is what Mary said about it. Starting at this page.
Mary Kirby wrote...
Herr Uhl wrote...
And they are chosen for what they do at the age of 12 (IIRC), then they get educated for that role and proceed to do it for the rest of their life.
There are promotions. No Arishok has ever taken up the job at the age of 12. Your "role" is "military." or "priesthood." Not, "Second assistant undergardener."
Mary Kirby wrote...
Herr Uhl wrote...
Well, wouldn't it be the same between a scout and a cannoneer? Or does every soldier start at grunt level?
All soldiers start at grunt level, though in different military branches. Grunts in the navy require slightly different aptitudes than grunts in the infantry or cavalry.
#103
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:24
Lord Gremlin wrote...
No. It's just saarebas are dangerous by nature. Decades of teaching can't fix that. In fact, saarebas are leashed because decades of teaching can't make them possession-proof.
Leashed... and have their mouths sewn shut, their eyes blinded. And then used at the whim of their masters.
They're treated worse then dogs or POWs.
Modifié par wulfsturm, 03 avril 2011 - 12:26 .
#104
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:25
#105
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:27
Lord Gremlin wrote...
No. It's just saarebas are dangerous by nature. Decades of teaching can't fix that. In fact, saarebas are leashed because decades of teaching can't make them possession-proof.The Angry One wrote...
So decades of teaching under the Qun cannot possibly overcome one day of life among bas Saarebas he may not even have come in direct contact with.
Concession that the Qun is a weak and fragile philosophy accepted.
Point remains, it takes a mage about three seconds and five mana to test if someone is possessed. Killing the mage, and everyone he might or might not have talked to, is *not* an efficient way to deal with the metter.
#106
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:28
Lord Gremlin wrote...
No. It's just saarebas are dangerous by nature. Decades of teaching can't fix that. In fact, saarebas are leashed because decades of teaching can't make them possession-proof.
So what? Ketojan was still collared and leashed. He was under control. The only question is his belief in his role, which was unshaken.
The Arvaraad obviously questioned that belief after a single day.
The Qun is a sham.
#107
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:31
Let me put it this way - you're a bas. Therefore, not a person, but an object. A Qunari will destroy such bas and reclaim what belongs to him.Camenae wrote...
The Qunari are too materialistic. Take their sword and they can't go back. Take their book and they can't go back. If I ever fall in love with a Qunari but he wants to satisfy a demand of the Qun that is not mine, then I just take something of his, and then he can never leave. Of course that comes with a 90% chance of him going berserk, but hey what's life without a little risk?
Of course, if you accept the Qun, maybe one day the demand of your Qun will be satisfied, your Jory shanked, your Warden greyed...
#108
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:33
Lord Gremlin wrote...
Let me put it this way - you're a bas. Therefore, not a person, but an object. A Qunari will destroy such bas and reclaim what belongs to him.
And such ultra materialism and moral bankruptcy leads an otherwise good person like Sten to murder civilians and children. Three cheers for the Qun everybody!
#109
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:34
The Angry One wrote...
Lord Gremlin wrote...
Let me put it this way - you're a bas. Therefore, not a person, but an object. A Qunari will destroy such bas and reclaim what belongs to him.
And such ultra materialism and moral bankruptcy leads an otherwise good person like Sten to murder civilians and children. Three cheers for the Qun everybody!
Sten is a person?
#110
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:35
Actually, it's much harder to check if mage is possessed. That's why templars are paranoid.Lithuasil wrote...
Lord Gremlin wrote...
No. It's just saarebas are dangerous by nature. Decades of teaching can't fix that. In fact, saarebas are leashed because decades of teaching can't make them possession-proof.The Angry One wrote...
So decades of teaching under the Qun cannot possibly overcome one day of life among bas Saarebas he may not even have come in direct contact with.
Concession that the Qun is a weak and fragile philosophy accepted.
Point remains, it takes a mage about three seconds and five mana to test if someone is possessed. Killing the mage, and everyone he might or might not have talked to, is *not* an efficient way to deal with the metter.
@The Angry One: And just how Arvaard could be 100% sure that bas haven't put a demon in Ketojan? What if it's demon talking? There is no way to make sure.
#111
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:36
The Angry One wrote...
So what? Ketojan was still collared and leashed. He was under control. The only question is his belief in his role, which was unshaken.
The Arvaraad obviously questioned that belief after a single day.
The Qun is a sham.
If he looked into the mages around Kirkwall when searching, I can see why he would be paranoid.
What I find odd about the situation is that he could talk (Ketojan). Wasn't the point of sewing his mouth shut and (alledgedly) cutting out the tongue was so they wouldn't talk?
#112
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:38
#113
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:38
The Angry One wrote...
Lord Gremlin wrote...
No. It's just saarebas are dangerous by nature. Decades of teaching can't fix that. In fact, saarebas are leashed because decades of teaching can't make them possession-proof.
So what? Ketojan was still collared and leashed. He was under control. The only question is his belief in his role, which was unshaken.
The Arvaraad obviously questioned that belief after a single day.
The Qun is a sham.
An Arvaraad's job is to watch a Saarabas, and ensure that his life is ended should he become an abomination (among other things). An abomination does not necissarily go about killing things willy-nilly the moment they become one (Look at Anders and Wynne). But that doesn't mean they aren't abominations. If a Saarabas is not under the supervision of an Arvaraad, it must be assumed that said Saarabas is an abomination, and that he must die.
That the Saarabas accepts said death means that the Saarabas believes in the Qun. Not that the Arvaraad disbelieves.
#114
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:38
Bas civilians and children. Just bas. And he had regrets even so.The Angry One wrote...
Lord Gremlin wrote...
Let me put it this way - you're a bas. Therefore, not a person, but an object. A Qunari will destroy such bas and reclaim what belongs to him.
And such ultra materialism and moral bankruptcy leads an otherwise good person like Sten to murder civilians and children. Three cheers for the Qun everybody!
#115
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:38
blothulfur wrote...
You shall know the certainty of true belief and bring the ordered wisdom of the Qun to the tasks you are set in life and thus be made strong in body and soul.
One must also mention free education, mastery of your vocation and respect whatever your position or race.
Anaan esaam Qun.
Ah ha! There you are blothufur! I've been searching for you ever since your "Hawke accepts the Qun?" thread. You keep your profile locked. Now have at you!
Modifié par Elton John is dead, 03 avril 2011 - 12:39 .
#116
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:38
Lord Gremlin wrote...
Actually, it's much harder to check if mage is possessed.
Not for anders it isn't. But if you'd argue that a lunatic abomination is much cleverer then any mage who embraces the qun, I won't object.
#117
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:39
I winced every time I saw Ketojan's lips straining against the stitches holding them shut, when he tried to talk...that was painful to watch!
#118
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:40
Camenae wrote...
@Herr Uhl,
I winced every time I saw Ketojan's lips straining against the stitches holding them shut, when he tried to talk...that was painful to watch!
He still could talk. What then is the point of sewing it shut? So he won't be able to eat solids?
#119
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:41
At least the Circle has some knowledge about the mages under it's charge.
Herr Uhl wrote...
He still could talk. What then is the point of sewing it shut? So he won't be able to eat solids?
Maybe the control rod thing the Arvaraad had loosens the stiches?
Modifié par The Angry One, 03 avril 2011 - 12:42 .
#120
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:42
That's a tough question actually. Should ask Mr. Gaider...Herr Uhl wrote...
Camenae wrote...
@Herr Uhl,
I winced every time I saw Ketojan's lips straining against the stitches holding them shut, when he tried to talk...that was painful to watch!
He still could talk. What then is the point of sewing it shut? So he won't be able to eat solids?
#121
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:46
#122
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:46
#123
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 12:50
Camenae wrote...
I thought it was cruel that Hawke had all those questions to ask Ketojan in the tunnel, after fighting the thugs. Good god, woman! Don't you see those stitches....agh painful...
Ha! I thought the same. He's just gurgling! He will only ever gurgle! Stop prodding the poor thing!
#124
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 01:07
Lithuasil wrote...
Lord Gremlin wrote...
Actually, it's much harder to check if mage is possessed.
Not for anders it isn't.
I've seen Anders' testing method and it seems, flawed, like witch trial flawed.
#125
Posté 03 avril 2011 - 01:08
I think the life of the poor would not become any worse under the Qun. Think about your mine with Hubert. All those guys were nearly killed 3 times just to make enough money to survive and then for their trouble they all get killed and eaten by a high dragon. Such a tragedy would still occur under the Qun, unless stoicism deters dragons, but the quality of life for the workers would've been better because well fed and rested miners are more productive.





Retour en haut






