The Angry One wrote...
AshenEndemion wrote...
Taking the city is not war on the rest of Thedas unless they were to
expand (or representatives of the rest of Thedas came in asking them to
leave, and the Arishok refused). It would only be war upon Kirkwall.
Declaring war on Kirkwall is breaking the treaty.
Any nation in Thedas would have a legitimate reason to declare war on the Qun if this situation lasted.
True, but no nation has the balls to do such a thing. Not over a single city-state in the Free Marches. Orlais certainly wouldn't do anything. Not after it could be inferred that the relic being lost is their fault (as it was stolen from them, not the Qunari directly). Ferelden would likely do nothing as well. The rest of the Free Marches might do something. But not until diplomacy failed. Which would give the Arishok a year or two to determine his plan.
The Arishok does recognize that the failing is his and not those under him. As evident by his willingness to duel Hawke (if he respects Hawke or if Fenris is there) if Isabella doesn't return. But that failing does not require the Arishok to do nothing unless it regards the book. Only that he is required to find the book before he returns to Par Vollen. Taking the city is protecting the followers of the Qun within the city. And protecting the followers of the Qun is a duty of the Arishok as directed by the Qun...





Retour en haut







