Aller au contenu

Photo

Does being an archer provide that much more survivability?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
7 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Gage123

Gage123
  • Members
  • 119 messages
Or will you constantly need to run around most of the time? 

#2
Atmosfear3

Atmosfear3
  • Members
  • 1 654 messages
You really like making topics don't you?

#3
Efienutyalorh

Efienutyalorh
  • Members
  • 20 messages
Well, guessing from your question, you're thinking survivability in terms of tanking, then no, any warrior class already outdoes the archers.

What I think you may be on to, is that most people say the archers has the best survivability among any other classes in terms soloing against a large number of enemies. That's because we can constantly run around and, stop to shoot, then move on. Also known as kiting. No other class has as atrocious a natural knockback rate than archers have simply by shooting their bow of theirs. Pretty much for any solo run, the staple for archers is to use the rogue skills to run away and create a distance, and keep on kiting.

So in terms of soloing survivability, archers have that upper hand. Warriors however still excel in the standard hit for hit survivability.

#4
Gage123

Gage123
  • Members
  • 119 messages
But in a party setup (less kiting), a archer will usually survive or have to deal less with getting damaged than a DW rogue right?

#5
Waltzingbear

Waltzingbear
  • Members
  • 577 messages
Bosses have abilities that cover a large area of effect or can attack multiple party members at once.
Take the High Dragon encounter for example. While it has a powerful cleave ability that it will only use directly in front of itself and will almost certainly kill any non-tank it also has a wing buffet ability that will affect anyone in a certain radius, a tail swish and a rear kick that will damage and knock back party members behind it.

As a general rule archers take less damage and knockbacks than a dw rogue. It is also less likely to be hit by friendly fire if you stay at a distance. They are still susceptible to certain dangers like magess spells and archers' attacks however.

#6
Gage123

Gage123
  • Members
  • 119 messages
I guess it's why DW has more damaging on-use abilities than archers. Makes sense now.

#7
Andraste_Reborn

Andraste_Reborn
  • Members
  • 4 823 messages
If you're playing on Nightmare, archers also don't have to worry about getting smacked in the face by their warrior companions' friendly fire. I found dual-wielding hard to use on Isabela for that reason, although Aveline killed her a lot less often than Fenris.

#8
Gage123

Gage123
  • Members
  • 119 messages
FF is an issue...but if you aren't using a two-hander, shouldn't be too much of a problem. Do archers do more damage overall ignoring knockdowns etc.? Never found any of the archer skills to be worthwhile or compare to the ones in the dual wield tree.

Modifié par Gage123, 03 avril 2011 - 07:21 .