Dragoonlordz wrote...
Lets try to keep it civil because I don't want my thread locked, I find that ignoring the aggressive one's who attack me works best because they get bored of talking to themselves and go away after a while.
As mentioned before the issue is he had a completley different idea to what RPG was and direction he wished to take this series, what i want and would like to see is someone lead the next title DA3 on the same course with same idiology as DAO because that title was critically acclaimed because of the fans it created and scores, ratings it got from Knowles concept and direction of how he wished the series to go.
Mike simply had a completley different agenda going by his interviews and such. DA2 became a test ground for his own concepts and ideas in what an RPG should be and while I can only hold him responsible for his role as lead developer what I'm saying is he took DA series in a different direction making changes not improvements (not to a new title or series which coincides with his idiology) but a pre-existing one with a fanbase created based off a different idiology.
I'm just saying I think DA3 should have a lead which realigns with what made the DA series aka DAO a success in the first place and madeso many fans. I'm 100% not asking for anyone to get fired and don't want anyone to suggest it in this thread but a shuffling of positions/projects happsn all the time in software industry he could easily head up a new title or alternative one while someone more inline with the original concept and direction of DA series takes the lead on DA3.
This is just my opinion and the reason I made a tread to discuss between like minded people we aren't demanding anything we are just discussing.
Very well said! I'm finding I pretty much agree with all of it.
It is unrealalistic for Mr Laidlaw to say "oops, my bad, sorry", it is a nice little fantasy, one i welcome lol.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






