Herr Uhl wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
A mage fighting is entirely different from a warrior fighting, so I don't see how that holds true and that's *if* Saarebas are regarded as men/women under the Qun at all.David Gaider wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
Yeah but Templars keep them on leashes as well, what's the difference between both?
The qunari mages are literally kept on leashes, held by an arvaarad (their "handler", if you will). The templars only keep mages on figurative leashes.Do the Qunari allow the Mages to practice and hone their abilities and give them positions where their powers will be useful, or shun the use of magic and just give them simple menial tasks like chef / bard?
I think it would be better to think of qunari mages as trained attack dogs.And if they DO use magic, do they allow it for fighting purposes and allow the Female Qunari to fight with their talents (If they can be mages)?
A female qunari who is a mage is no longer female. She is saarebas-- a "dangerous thing", not even a person really. So, yes, female qunari do fight with their magic, but they're considered part of the arvaarad the same way a sword would be part of the warrior.
Ha! I was right I was riiight.
*victory dance*





Retour en haut






