27 réponses à ce sujet

[The Fred]

As you say, most Warlocks are going to stick with no or low ASF if they can, so I wouldn't think it would make much difference either way, and anyway, the Warlock Buddy as it is doesn't seem to take things like that into account. I want to make sure it does make sense so long as it's not going to screw balance over, and it doesn't seem like such a change will do that - at the end of the day, if a player wants to build a Fighter/Warlock around HB, probably only getting +2d6, they may as well get what benefit it gives them.

Warlock 3/Cleric X could be quite interesting, though, with Practised Spellcaster and the infamous Divine Power, maybe War domain too (I intend to "nerf" DP in my campaign anyway, but hey).

[manageri]

If you want to encourage that 1-2d6 HB dip for fighters/whatever then by all means make it ASF free. I don't think it's that OP either (assuming a nerfed draining blast) but I wouldn't bend the rules to make it especially attractive.

I don't know if I'd ever go for it with a cleric since you'd be losing spell progression, which is a bigger deal than losing a few fighter bonus feats and delaying access to the fighter only feats. I agree DP could use some nerfing (or just deletion tbh).

Modifié par manageri, 07 avril 2011 - 10:36 .

[The Fred]

I think it's already ASF, though, I was considering adding it in. I just don't think it's worth it because Fighter X/Warlock 3 is clearly not that much more powerful than anything else, and it doesn't make a lot of sense either.