HBO's Game of Thrones
#2776
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 03:32
#2777
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 03:39
#2778
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 03:39
Truth be told ASoIaF deserved a movie series. 2-3 movies for each book to do them justice.
#2779
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 03:56
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Well I think we won't have horses, and very likely we won't have a huge fleet battle.
Truth be told ASoIaF deserved a movie series. 2-3 movies for each book to do them justice.
That would cost more than the television series and there was no guarantee they would've been successful.
Plus, that is A LOT of movies for a book series. Fact is, movies based on books always leave out WAY too much.
The television series gives us more than the movies would. Not as much as the books of course, but I think its safe to say we're better off with the television series.
#2780
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 04:02
#2781
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 04:25
I assume they will. There's no way to film Blackwater without a lot of CGI. They already had a nice CGI shot of Stannis' fleet off the coast of Renly's camp.Confess-A-Bear wrote...
See thats why I said, why even bother, oh well. Maybe it won't be too botched up. Though I really don't get why they just don't use limted CGI for the battles, like Star Wars has done with its latest movies. I mean just have all the warriors and nights in various helmets and no focus on the faces, and no one would care.
Let's not even contemplate how screwed up the story would be if Hollywood was doing it.
Modifié par Addai67, 21 mai 2012 - 04:26 .
#2782
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 04:44
#2783
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 05:07
#2784
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 05:08
Addai67 wrote...
They have a much bigger budget this year and I think they're probably going to blow a lot of it on the next 2 episodes. That doesn't mean it will have the scale of the books. GRRM commented when he was writing the Blackwater episode that he was having to pare it down a lot from the book presentation, and didn't know if even his pared down version would make the cut.
This is a pretty interesting interview with David and Dan on the Blackwater episode and what it took to make it. I guess we should be thankful they were able to get more money for it since they almost had to have all Blackwater take place from Cersei and Sansa's POV, holed up in the Red Keep.
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Well I think we won't have horses, and very likely we won't have a huge fleet battle.
Truth be told ASoIaF deserved a movie series. 2-3 movies for each book to do them justice.
The problem with movies is that they'd do a better job with the scale and spectacle of the world, to be sure, but there is no way they'd be able to maintain probably even half of the depth of characters. Movie versions would be even more condensed, even if you were doing 2-3 hour movies and 3 movies per book. That would still only be about 9 hours per book if you had 3 3 hour movies per book, which would never happen anyway.
I really think the show could be much better paced if bumped the budget up even more so they could cast and introduce certain characters a little earlier and have maybe 12 episodes per season. I'm hoping next season will be paced a little better considering they have basically 2 seasons to adapt A Storm of Swords. And splitting ASoS into 2 seasons is probably best budget wise, leaving the big battle from ASoS for season 4, I'm guessing.
#2785
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 05:21
Eww, if they made them into movies they'd probably end up dumbed down to Michael Bay level proportions. Plus, 2 to 3 movies per book isn't happening, maybe 2-3 for the whole series. Movies can not get as much done as a tv series can. You may get extra cash for cgi and battles, but think of all the dialog that would be cut.Costin_Razvan wrote...
Truth be told ASoIaF deserved a movie series. 2-3 movies for each book to do them justice.
They've changed a lot from the books but it's still entertaining. Anyone expecting the upcoming seasons to be better than the first is kidding themselves. It happens with every tv show. The first season will always be the greatest.M U P P 3 T Z wrote...
Really sad that I don't have HBO and I always look at this thread longingly. How is Season 2 shaping up for those of you lucky ones?
#2786
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 05:26
#2787
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 06:40
WARRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!
#2788
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 07:34
SRSLY? That would have failed hard.Brockololly wrote...
This is a pretty interesting interview with David and Dan on the Blackwater episode and what it took to make it. I guess we should be thankful they were able to get more money for it since they almost had to have all Blackwater take place from Cersei and Sansa's POV, holed up in the Red Keep.
True.The problem with movies is that they'd do a better job with the scale and spectacle of the world, to be sure, but there is no way they'd be able to maintain probably even half of the depth of characters.
HBO just needs to dump the rest of their original programming line-up and put that money into GoT. The whole rest of the channel is complete garbage. They were better when they showed the same good movies 3 times a day.
#2789
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 08:15
Eww, if they made them into movies they'd probably end up dumbed down to Michael Bay level proportions. Plus, 2 to 3 movies per book isn't happening, maybe 2-3 for the whole series. Movies can not get as much done as a tv series can. You may get extra cash for cgi and battles, but think of all the dialog that would be cut.
Frankly there is no book series that had as complex characters as Song of Ice and Fire that was translated to the big screen, but I can name some book/movie adaptions that did a very good job.
The First 3 Harry Potter movies and the LOTR movies. Yes there were some changes, some for the worse some for the better but those were superb films. Not just for the spectacle.
As I see it 3 movies could have given us just as much in terms of characters, if not more, as the TV series and more spectacle.
Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 21 mai 2012 - 08:17 .
#2790
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 09:10
Maybe I'm biased because I can't tell you 5 movies I enjoyed in the last five years. They're all spectacle to me. Great visuals but little to none character development and deep storytelling.
On a side note, here's a good behind the scenes type article on Blackwater.
http://insidetv.ew.c...nes-blackwater/
#2791
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 09:56
#2792
Posté 21 mai 2012 - 11:44
Aeowyn wrote...
<snip>
I lol'd.
But if the show keeps up like this, I'm joining the Wildings.
#2793
Posté 22 mai 2012 - 12:59
Costin_Razvan wrote...
Eww, if they made them into movies they'd probably end up dumbed down to Michael Bay level proportions. Plus, 2 to 3 movies per book isn't happening, maybe 2-3 for the whole series. Movies can not get as much done as a tv series can. You may get extra cash for cgi and battles, but think of all the dialog that would be cut.
Frankly there is no book series that had as complex characters as Song of Ice and Fire that was translated to the big screen, but I can name some book/movie adaptions that did a very good job.
The First 3 Harry Potter movies and the LOTR movies. Yes there were some changes, some for the worse some for the better but those were superb films. Not just for the spectacle.
As I see it 3 movies could have given us just as much in terms of characters, if not more, as the TV series and more spectacle.
Well I wouldnt call LotR a good adaptation.
Dont get me wrong, I love all 3 movies, imo they are among the best movies ever made if you judge them on their own, but they changed too much from the novels to be an example of a good adaptation.
#2794
Posté 22 mai 2012 - 01:11
Cheeky little Arya reminded me again she's the reason I got into this. That was probably the most epic shrug there will ever be. I actually started giggling out loud.
I may be alone in this but I also really liked the Robb + pretty doctor scenes.
Also, a girl demands an international speak like Jaqen day.
#2795
Posté 22 mai 2012 - 03:21
.
Also, a girl demands an international speak like Jaqen day.
A girl seconds this.
#2796
Posté 22 mai 2012 - 03:43
Maybe I'm biased because I can't tell you 5 movies I enjoyed in the last five years. They're all spectacle to me. Great visuals but little to none character development and deep storytelling.
Truth be told I agree with you that most movies nowadays are ****. But the last 2 Harry Potter movies were pretty good adaptations.
#2797
Posté 22 mai 2012 - 06:16
When you don't see any scenes from Robb's battles, don't see his tactics in effect, he appears rather cluless to me. He's always either acting awkward around that nurse or failing to make a decision about what to do regarding Theon's actions.
#2798
Posté 22 mai 2012 - 06:44
Meanwhile Robb marched on Riverrun with his entire cavalry. Freed it, captured Jaime, smashed two thirds of the entire Lannister Force there. Was proclaimed King of the North and he gained support of the the Tully Bannermen.
After that he left Edmure Tully with a relatively large force to defend Riverrun, but only Riverrun. However near Riverrun stood the crossings Tywin needed to use if he was to reach Lannister lands and stop Robb.
Robb's plan was to allow Tywin to cross without opposition and since his force is mostly foot and Robb's is cavalry he was going to let Tywin advance, then outflank him. Gather Edmure's men and hold their ground at a strategic location where Tywin would have had a hard time winning a battle against Robb. Nevermind that Rose Bolton still had over 10.000 Infantry in play as well.
Of course Edmure being the ****ing idiot decided to fight at the crossings and ruined Robb's plan.
They ruined all that in the TV show by having Robb keep his entire force together, by not having Edmure until now and having Robb say he made the deal with the Freys for the crossing. Robb gained more then just a bloody crossing. He gained 4.000 troops.
Modifié par Costin_Razvan, 22 mai 2012 - 06:53 .
#2799
Posté 22 mai 2012 - 11:45
xenacrocker wrote...
.
Also, a girl demands an international speak like Jaqen day.
A girl seconds this.
A man reads, and a man supports girls.
#2800
Posté 22 mai 2012 - 11:52





Retour en haut




