I never denied that.
But you seem to deny what caused Robert to hold that view. And Stannis was going to be tossed aside no matter what he did, because he was Stannis.
And as they say, the truth is never that simple. If you opened fanboy eyes for Dany, maybe you'd see it. Robert cooled off enough to realize that it was senseless to murder the two and eventually called off the assassins.
So here we are two fanboys: one is generally acknowledged to be more logical and rational (to a point where he is seen to be a cold-hearted bastard) and utilizes information. The other is seen as a bleeding heart who argues from emotion and feeling. Who's considered more 'right' here?
I'm not even a Dany fangirl, I just prefer her over Stannis. Simple as that. Why? Because Westeros does not need another tyrant or zealot whom their humanity is debatable at this point. I'm not objectively saying he doesn't have humanity, but it can be argued and debated which speaks volumes about him. Its the doubt that's important.
If I'm being bold, people like Stannis are attack dogs. They must be leashed and used in military matters, not become kings. He would be a perfect general but a terrible king. I think we both know this at this point. If you take a look at our leaders in the past who were war veterans you'll quickly realize a pattern of unhappy populace, civil wars and wars in general. Stannis is not meant to be in realm of politics and diplomacy and there is no future for Westeros if Stannis actually manages to conquer it, another Robert is best expectation one can have of him, but I expect even less.





Retour en haut





