Aller au contenu

Photo

Would you be pissed if Earth dies and humanity becomes or atleast comes close to becoming an endangered species?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
661 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Malanek

Malanek
  • Members
  • 7 838 messages

jamesp81 wrote...
It's pretty clear that would be the result given the size of that asteroid.

The asteroid that extincted the dinosaurs was estimated to have been between 6km and 10km in diameter.  The force of the impact released energy equal 100 million megatons, which is orders of magnitude more power than every nuclear weapon every built combined.

Now, just load up Bring Down the Sky, land on the asteroid in the Mako, and tell me if you think it's 6km in diameter.  I'm pretty certain it's more.  Also, one of the engineers on that asteroid flat out stated in the mission that it would destroy the entire planet.  His exact quote was "Terra Nova will die Shepard.  Not just out colony.  The planet"

If X57 had hit Terra Nova, it would've killed most in the capital immediately since that's where the rock was pointed.  It hardly matters, however, as the dust kicked up in the atmosphere would've caused a nuclear winter that would've blocked out the sun for years, maybe even decades.  Photosynthetic life on the entire planet would die of starvation, and then all the wildlife dependent on that vegetation would follow suit.


This is almost off topic but I'll go there. There is evidence that a 15km asteroid hit the gulf of mexico which is widely accredited to have been largely responsible for the dinosaurs extinction. This was the size when it hit the earth, while it was out floating in space it would be many times larger but as it passes through the earths atmosphere it would disintergrate rapidly. This didn't wipe out all wildlife. It didn't wipe out all animals. It didn't instantly wipe out the dinosaurs. A more technolgically advanced species that was able to live in buildings and understand microbiology would have survived that. The asteroid in Bring down the sky didn't seem all that large (many times smaller in fact) but its scale is unreliable when playing a game. Was the size stated anywhere?

jamesp81 wrote...
The Batarians have demonstrated both a willingness and a capability to launch genocidal attacks on human worlds.  This is not theory, it's established fact in the game's canon.

I repeat this was a terrorist activity. Terrorism has always been used to right wrongs (or perceived wrongs) when a faction is unable to fight back on a military level. Just because a group of Batarians is prepared to commit such an act does not mean that such a group would systematically go about doing so to a species that is millitarily weaker.

jamesp81 wrote...
Destruction of Earth in ME3 means humanity is done on the galactic scene.  Forever.

No.

#102
Thepeak12

Thepeak12
  • Members
  • 363 messages
It'd be pretty disappointing if there was nothing you could do to save earth, like all that work you'd be doing in ME3 to save earth for nothing? Damn. And if humans become an endangered species, Shepard better get started on repopulating the human race :wizard:

#103
Malanek

Malanek
  • Members
  • 7 838 messages
ME4 should start with you in charge of setting up a new (or recently devastated) colony and protecting it from Batarians, Vorcha, pirates and remaining reapers.

#104
CulturalGeekGirl

CulturalGeekGirl
  • Members
  • 3 280 messages

Almostfaceman wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Yeah, your Shepard is so kind and forgiving she has a body count numbering in the 100's.


Oh be nice, golly gee wiz.


No no, this is an important lesson, and an important factor to what I'm talking about.

Often people confuse kindness and forgiveness for weakness. They also lump them in with pacifism. Neither is close to the case.

I think you can be a kind person and still kill bad people. If I run an orphanage, and some guy comes in there and threatens to stab all the children, and I kill that guy... I'm still a kind person. Similarly, being forgiving doesn't require you stand still and allow someone to shoot you.  Just later, if they say "ok, I'll stop shooting you, and I won't do it again," then you can decide to give them another chance and not hold a grudge.

So yes, my Shepard is kind and forgiving whenever she is given the opportunity - so... give her the opportunity. That's more than most offer.

#105
Devbo22

Devbo22
  • Members
  • 240 messages

Malanek999 wrote...

ME4 should start with you in charge of setting up a new (or recently devastated) colony and protecting it from Batarians, Vorcha, pirates and remaining reapers.

It would be the perfect segway into the Mass Effect RTS....

#106
lovgreno

lovgreno
  • Members
  • 3 523 messages
No, a victory should cost you a lot and it could be a interesting setting for following games. A situation like the Quarians perhaps. Of course those who want a bigger di... I mean a unrealistic galactic empire for their ubermensh may be dissapointed.

#107
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4 051 messages

Nyoka wrote...

Almostfaceman wrote...

Nyoka wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...
The problems that plague humanity are not caused by history either, but by human nature.

Yeah, definitely better off then.


Then by your logic all life is better off then (being wiped out), since it all exhibits the same flaws of humanity.

So you're saying the asaris, the salarians and the turians think just like Saphra Deden, right?


None of the aforementioned aliens are morally superior or inferior to humans.

#108
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4 051 messages

Malanek999 wrote...

jamesp81 wrote...
Destruction of Earth in ME3 means humanity is done on the galactic scene.  Forever.

No.


Yes.  It does.  If you don't see that, then your understanding of economics, populations, and politics is flawed.

#109
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 675 messages
Saphra, chill. The moment you start calling others naive you are at your least persuasive, especially when some of your opponents here like CultureGirl are anything but.

Take a step back and don't make it personal.

#110
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4 051 messages

lovgreno wrote...

No, a victory should cost you a lot and it could be a interesting setting for following games. A situation like the Quarians perhaps. Of course those who want a bigger di... I mean a unrealistic galactic empire for their ubermensh may be dissapointed.


Not interested in a galactic empire.  Just trying to save enough that we don't get kicked off the council, enslaved, or demoted to Elcor/Hanar status.

#111
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4 051 messages
Regardless of what anyone here, at Bioware, or any other place thinks, I do still have the option to vote with my wallet Image IPB

If Earth is destroyed in ME3, Bioware doesn't get my money.  Simple as that.

#112
Almostfaceman

Almostfaceman
  • Members
  • 5 458 messages

jamesp81 wrote...

Regardless of what anyone here, at Bioware, or any other place thinks, I do still have the option to vote with my wallet Image IPB

If Earth is destroyed in ME3, Bioware doesn't get my money.  Simple as that.


Yup if it's an unavoidable event I won't buy the game either.

#113
Inquisitor Recon

Inquisitor Recon
  • Members
  • 11 809 messages
Why? There are probably better planets out there.

#114
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages
Earth = earth. Molten iron. Rock. Water. Gases. Can't really die.

Earth's inhabitants = 11.4 billion of lazy earthworms, comsuming a large portion of the Alliance industrial output. Can die, I won't get sentimental about it other than just for show. It's like when your rich uncle dies, and you are the only heir.

#115
Almostfaceman

Almostfaceman
  • Members
  • 5 458 messages

ReconTeam wrote...

Why? There are probably better planets out there.


If you have to ask, then I can't explain it to you.  Doesn't really matter, as it doesn't effect your gaming experience in the slightest.

#116
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages
As TIM so eloquently put it: "We go on. [...] Humanity will persevere. We are nothing if not resilient."

Unlike the quarians, we won't take no for an answer if forced into an underdog position. Like Ambassador Goyle in the Revelation novel, we won't allow ourselves to be bullied around just because our new alien overlords feel like it. We either maintain our current influence on Citadel politics or regain it, damn the consequences; there is no other option.

Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 06 avril 2011 - 04:35 .


#117
ADelusiveMan

ADelusiveMan
  • Members
  • 1 172 messages
I would be willing to sacrifice Earth if an entire galaxy was at risk.

#118
Manic Sheep

Manic Sheep
  • Members
  • 1 446 messages
Not realty no, why would I be pissed if you can’t save earth in a video game? Plus I’m weird and I like depressing stories. Makes things more interesting when things are going badly.

#119
Markinator_123

Markinator_123
  • Members
  • 773 messages

ADelusiveMan wrote...

I would be willing to sacrifice Earth if an entire galaxy was at risk.


I would sacrifice the entire galaxy if it meant saving Earth. I am not going to allow humanity to be bullied by the aliens.

#120
CulturalGeekGirl

CulturalGeekGirl
  • Members
  • 3 280 messages

jamesp81 wrote...

lovgreno wrote...

No, a victory should cost you a lot and it could be a interesting setting for following games. A situation like the Quarians perhaps. Of course those who want a bigger di... I mean a unrealistic galactic empire for their ubermensh may be dissapointed.


Not interested in a galactic empire.  Just trying to save enough that we don't get kicked off the council, enslaved, or demoted to Elcor/Hanar status.


A clarification here:

Demotion to "associate" status would suck. I do not want to see it happen. But if it happened to us, we would likely recover, and after a few hundred years we'd be back on the council. The reason the Volus and Elcor and Hanar remain associate races for so long is that their cultures are fundamentally incapable of the kind of politicking and military action required to be council members. They, quite simply, don't have what it takes.

Ok, Galactic history lesson on the council! If you don't want to read it, skip everything between the asterisks.
****************

This whole "most races have to wait hundreds of years" thing is crap. They're making these rules up as they go along, and while some patterns have emerged, they are by no means consistent. The Asari had the citadel for only 60 years before the Salarians arrived, and the council was formed 20 years later. Scarcely a wait of centuries. The Salarians got their "seat" 20 years after their first contact with the citadel.

After that, the Council primarily encounters pre-mass-relay species, it seems. (It's unclear whether or not the Volus had achieved Mass Relay tech when they were encountered, but the Elcor had not and there's no suggestion that the Hanar had.) It makes some sense that the council races might look upon these younger races as children, almost as though they had been "uplifted." The Quarians and Batarians are the edge-cases here. I can't find any information about Quarian history that isn't tied to the Geth, and the Batarians were crazy slaving warmongers, so it's kind of understandable that they didn't get a citadel seat. I'd assume that the Quarians never seriously fought for one, or, being a non-colonizing race, never saw the need.

The next relay-capable race they encounter is the Rachni, and we all know how that goes. The Salarians uplift the Krogan so again, not on equal footing, not perceived as equals, the Krogan rebel. New war, second verse, same as the first, a little bit louder and a little bit worse.

Eventually, when they start losing the Krogan rebellions, so they look for a new fighty race, to help fight. They find the Turians who have mass relay tech but have been too busy with civil war for the past 1200 years to make contact themselves. Still, they seem more reasonable than the Krogan (which is roughly equivalent to being taller than the Volus), so they're given a shot. Two hundreds years after they're recruited into service, they're granted a seat. This is some 1300 years after the Salarians and the Asari formed the council.

It's another 1340 years before humanity discovers FTL and Mass Relay tech, and we've already started a bunch of colonies and exploration before we make first contact. If it weren't for the Turians, we might have been the first race in millenia to independently make contact with the Citadel, without being discovered by Asari or Salarian scouts looking for "undeveloped" races.

While this has created a negative image of humans in the Galaxy, I don't think the Turians come out looking bright and shiny either. The Asari and Salarians are always wary that their warrior race might go crazy, and having two warrior races to counterbalance each other is very appealing. What's more, the Turians have shown that they are IDIOTS when it comes to handling first contact. I mean christ on a ******, people. Haven't you heard of hailing frequencies? I think the Asari and Salarians, the two prettiest girls in school, are still deciding who should be prom king. The good old dependable Turians, or the new kid... a badass stranger who might just turn out to have a heart of gold.

And they can delay that as long as they want. They know they have the highest WIS and INT scores, respectively, and now they have that little "well we made the Turians wait for 200 years so it wouldn't be like, you know, fair to let you in the club right away," line to trot out. But the 30 years humanity is around before they get a seat is just about the amount of time it took the Asari to let the Salarians in, when they made contact. So it's not so unprecedented, after all.

**************************

Ok, sheesh. You probably didn't need to know all of that. Hell, I probably didn't need to know all of that. Sorry.

To sum up: if the council meets a race that is
1. Ambitious
2. Capable of widespread expansion
3. Capable of diplomacy
4. Capable of militarizing

That race will get a seat on the council eventually. Every race other than the council races fails at least one of those tests. Even a vastly weakened humanity would still pass them all, after a few generations, as long as they don't become too militant or incapable of diplomacy; that's how the Krogan and the Batarians screwed themselves out of a solid future. What's more, we're the council's only real hope if the Turians all of a sudden decide to go kill-crazy. Bear in mind the Turians spent 1200 years having an interplanetary civil war with themselves. The only reason they stopped was that they killed themselves out, and then they immediately were willing to go fight in another centuries long war. Finally, the first time they ever encounter a new race, they start a war. Compared to that, human history is basically a sack fulla rainbows.

Honestly the whole council vs. associate thing bothers me profoundly. If my Shep comes out of this with any political power, she's going to fight for some sort of actual representation for non-council races who are members of the Citadel.

#121
Almostfaceman

Almostfaceman
  • Members
  • 5 458 messages

CulturalGeekGirl wrote...

To sum up: if the council meets a race that is
1. Ambitious
2. Capable of widespread expansion
3. Capable of diplomacy
4. Capable of militarizing

That race will get a seat on the council eventually. Every race other than the council races fails at least one of those tests. Even a vastly weakened humanity would still pass them all, after a few generations, as long as they don't become too militant or incapable of diplomacy; that's how the Krogan and the Batarians screwed themselves out of a solid future. What's more, we're the council's only real hope if the Turians all of a sudden decide to go kill-crazy. Bear in mind the Turians spent 1200 years having an interplanetary civil war with themselves. The only reason they stopped was that they killed themselves out, and then they immediately were willing to go fight in another centuries long war. Finally, the first time they ever encounter a new race, they start a war. Compared to that, human history is basically a sack fulla rainbows.

Honestly the whole council vs. associate thing bothers me profoundly. If my Shep comes out of this with any political power, she's going to fight for some sort of actual representation for non-council races who are members of the Citadel.


You make a good point but I think you're discounting the comparision between humanity being introduced to the Council races as the Alliance vs. humans scattered about after the devastation of losing Earth.

I think it's "unrealistic" if I may use that word in this fictional universe - to not expect forces in just about every other race - government or otherwise - to take advantage of humans weakness so that they can further their own race.  Some factors, like the batarians, will be out-n-out hostile.  Other forces could be benign at first then evolve into a type of dictatorship.  "Ah, we let you humans come to our colony - now you grow too numerous. To make sure you don't take too many jobs from our race, we want you to start this colony at X planet and then set up certain jobs/resources for us there.  We will share of course, as long as you prove yourself worthy."  We have only to look at our own history to see how one group is always scrabbling for domination over another.  Losing Earth would in my opinion set humans back quite a bit.

#122
Nathan Redgrave

Nathan Redgrave
  • Members
  • 2 062 messages

jamesp81 wrote...

No, there is no doubt, if Earth is destroyed, humanity is done, FOREVER, as a galactic power and quite possibly will be an extinct species within a few decades.  It's really that simple.


Here's an interesting question. If Earth were destroyed, and humanity as a species took a blow, would the eventual outcome of this not be effected by humanity's percieved role in all of the events throughout the trilogy? For example:

Paragon victory #1--Earth is sacrificed to halt the Reaper invasion before it spreads to other species. Coupled with humanity's selfless defense of the Destiny Ascension during Saren's attack on the Citadel and humanity's respected position as a Council race, this garners massive respect and sympathy from the other races, and humanity, while initially in a bad position, is able to recover with the support of the other Council races, with even the batarians possibly lending a hand depending on Shepard's actions with regard to that particular species. Humanity is percieved (sometimes grudgingly) as a loyal defender of galactic stability, and well-deserving of its seat on the Citadel Council. While not as immediately powerful as in Renegade Victory #2, this ending ensures that humanity's place in the galaxy will last.

Renegade victory #1--Earth is sacrificed to halt the Reaper invasion. Humanity is not in good standing with the larger galactic community, but because of Shepard's actions while working with Cerberus, the "human-survivalist" organization is able to counter anti-human movements despite not having fully recovered from their post-Retribution weakness. Humanity retains its Council seat, but never quite achieves the same level of influence it had prior to the Reaper invasion.

Renegade victory #2--Earth is not sacrificed to halt the Reaper invasion, and a long, bloody war follows. Humanity takes the helm, and after the Reapers are finally thwarted, the other races have taken so much damage that humanity--both the Alliance, and, eventually, Cerberus--are able to further cement their dominance over the galaxy. They are respected, feared, and in control... for now.

...Can't think of a second Paragon ending at the moment, but you get the idea.

Modifié par Nathan Redgrave, 06 avril 2011 - 05:18 .


#123
ADelusiveMan

ADelusiveMan
  • Members
  • 1 172 messages

Manic Sheep wrote...

Not realty no, why would I be pissed if you can’t save earth in a video game? Plus I’m weird and I like depressing stories. Makes things more interesting when things are going badly.


This.

#124
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

CulturalGeekGirl wrote...

I think you can be a kind person and still kill bad people.


Shepard goes out of her way kill people. She chose a profession where she must kill for a living, and not she's not even a super hero or anything. All she did was promise to kill for the whims of a government.

What was her justification for doing Garrus' loyalty mission, or did you skip that one? Garrus told you up front that he intended to kill Sidonis. So did you shoot your way through dozens of mercs just so you could not kill Sidonis?

That's my problem with Paragon Shepard. She preaches about ideals she doesn't even really try to live up to. It's silly being lectured on compassion and understanding from a woman who has killed her maimed her way across the galaxy.

#125
CulturalGeekGirl

CulturalGeekGirl
  • Members
  • 3 280 messages

Almostfaceman wrote...

CulturalGeekGirl wrote...

To sum up: if the council meets a race that is
1. Ambitious
2. Capable of widespread expansion
3. Capable of diplomacy
4. Capable of militarizing

That race will get a seat on the council eventually. Every race other than the council races fails at least one of those tests. Even a vastly weakened humanity would still pass them all, after a few generations, as long as they don't become too militant or incapable of diplomacy; that's how the Krogan and the Batarians screwed themselves out of a solid future. What's more, we're the council's only real hope if the Turians all of a sudden decide to go kill-crazy. Bear in mind the Turians spent 1200 years having an interplanetary civil war with themselves. The only reason they stopped was that they killed themselves out, and then they immediately were willing to go fight in another centuries long war. Finally, the first time they ever encounter a new race, they start a war. Compared to that, human history is basically a sack fulla rainbows.

Honestly the whole council vs. associate thing bothers me profoundly. If my Shep comes out of this with any political power, she's going to fight for some sort of actual representation for non-council races who are members of the Citadel.


You make a good point but I think you're discounting the comparision between humanity being introduced to the Council races as the Alliance vs. humans scattered about after the devastation of losing Earth.

I think it's "unrealistic" if I may use that word in this fictional universe - to not expect forces in just about every other race - government or otherwise - to take advantage of humans weakness so that they can further their own race.  Some factors, like the batarians, will be out-n-out hostile.  Other forces could be benign at first then evolve into a type of dictatorship.  "Ah, we let you humans come to our colony - now you grow too numerous. To make sure you don't take too many jobs from our race, we want you to start this colony at X planet and then set up certain jobs/resources for us there.  We will share of course, as long as you prove yourself worthy."  We have only to look at our own history to see how one group is always scrabbling for domination over another.  Losing Earth would in my opinion set humans back quite a bit.

I'm not arguing that losing earth wouldn't set us back. It would probably set us back a thousand years, if not more. I'm arguing that it wouldn't necessarily make us irrelevant or endangered.

I'm sorry if I've missed this, but I haven't seen you address a factor I find fairly significant: the fact that, if humanity is devastated, it will be due to a threat that we warned the galaxy about, and one that threatened everyone. I think we will be seen as having "taken a bullet for everyone," and it will all come down to spin. (If we're devastated by anything other than the Reapers, or if the rest of the galaxy never acknowledges the fact that the Reapers were a threat to anyone but us then yes, we are boned. However, for the purpose of the ME3 universe, I find those scenarios incredibly unlikely.)

Argh I know a perfect human history analogue, but I do not want this to become one of those threads. So I am going to describe the situation. Consider it theoretical. Please don't chime in with the answer, if you know it.

Ahem. So there's a nation. Very new to serious involvement in global politics, minor colonial power, almost comically misunderstood by the outside world, engaged in a lot of wars of expansion, made some powerful local enemies. Took the wrong side in a war, was first vilified then devastated by that war, could easily have been utterly destroyed by its enemies. Weakened severely, losing morale, unconditional surrender. Stripped of the right to have a full military.

(This is the status I see humanity having after a worst-case scenario Reaper slaughter on earth... with the added bonus that the "country" who devastated them isn't involved in global politics.)

Nation reaches out to the global community. Nation's devastation during the war evokes sympathy from the rest of the world. Nation forms steady, decades-long alliance with former worst enemy, unprecedented prosperity, becomes the nation with the highest average standard of living on its continent. Continued political relevance, despite being surrounded by old enemies.

If humanity will do that for a nation that was on the wrong side of a major war, why is it unrealistic to expect the galactic community to do the same for us? And that example is more akin to humanity being devastated by war with the Asari. Now imagine a major country isn't destroyed in a war of their own instigation or hit by a falling meteor: that country is attacked by gorram alien cthulubots. 

There's a famous quote that I can't find a clear citation for, about what happens when humanity is threatened from the outside: "Black and white live in perfect harmony and gang up on green." or the like. It's a Pratchett quote.

Now you could take that as evidence that speciesism overwhelms all other priorities, but i look at it a different way: when the enemies are giant Cthulubots from Dark Space, black, white, blue, green, and grey will get together and gang up on Cthulubot. Organics banding together against the Reapers seems as natural as humanity banding together in response to an alien attack.

Modifié par CulturalGeekGirl, 06 avril 2011 - 06:51 .