Allot of people also seem to think that bioware don't care, there happy that they have your money, pfft to those who are dissappointed in the game. Many more also blame EA. My views? I simply think bioware tried to release a game to please everyone, and just like clothing with the "one size fitts all" tag, not everyone agreed.
We must admit, some of the changes that bioware made for DA2 were actually decent changes, and very good ideas!, but it was the EXECUTION that let the game down, hence its current status. The story was a little rushed (pacing wise), but it is still good! if act 1 was quicker and act 3 was longer, i think that would improve the game immediatly.
Some might argue, why would bioware make a patch? It would take too long, be to large a download, probably cause more problems then fixes, so why bother? To answer these questions I have four words. STALKER. Shadow of Chernoble. On realease this game was virtually unplayable, yet THQ listened to its fans and released a HUGE patch about 2/3weeks or a month after release, which fixed a large percentage of the games problems, and the game actually resembled what the dev. aimed for it to be. Hell MORE people actually took a chance and bought/played the game afterwards.
To further cement my point, some of the bugs/niggles that occur in the game have allready been fixed/workaround by the game community. This shows that even without a toolset, many of the problems are quite easily fixed.
I feel that DA2 is a great game, I immensly enjoyed it, and despite the flaws, I will play it again. I implore you bioware! Please think on what Ihave said. Your fans are eternally loyal, but that loyalty has been stretched as far as it can possibly go with awakenings and DA2, please do not dissapoint us further, and prove those who are against you WRONG: That you do listen to your fans, that you acknowledge that you make mistakes, and fix what needs to be fixed. We understand





Retour en haut







