Meredith is NOT insane
#1
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:08
Bit disappointed with the demon-sword twist, really. It just seemed like a cheap ploy to turn one side into the Big Bad. Would have been much better to keep the mage-templar conflict as morally ambiguous as possible, imho...
#2
Guest_Fiddles_stix_*
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:13
Guest_Fiddles_stix_*
#3
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:15
#4
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:16
Meredith is insane. She's had the idol of gooey-magical-brain-whacka-whacka for three years. Look at what happened to Bartrand, and his race is more resistant to the effects of lyrium than humans.
#5
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:20
Maria Caliban wrote...
Saying Meredith isn't insane because you agree with her is like saying someone isn't bipolar because you share political views with them.
Meredith is insane. She's had the idol of gooey-magical-brain-whacka-whacka for three years. Look at what happened to Bartrand, and his race is more resistant to the effects of lyrium than humans.
I got the impression that Dwarves were actually more affected by the particular lyrium in the Idol than other races. When we're in Bartrand's house, Varric is the only one that starts going sorta batty in the party.
Otherwise, I agree. Meredith is nuts. However, I do not think the Idol made Meredith think the way she did. It only exacerbated things that were already there in her psyche.
#6
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:24
Ferretinabun wrote...
Seriously, right up until she pulled out the demon-sword I was half on her side. Doing a mage Hawke I was siding with the mages to see how it would play out, but I couldn't help thinking she was in the right. Blood mages ARE everywhere in Kirkwall. If we take Anders as an abomination (which technically he is) then I felt pretty damn lonely as the only mage in Kirkwall who doesn't cut his palm the moment the going gets rough.
Bit disappointed with the demon-sword twist, really. It just seemed like a cheap ploy to turn one side into the Big Bad. Would have been much better to keep the mage-templar conflict as morally ambiguous as possible, imho...
I pretty much agree with you on most parts. I sided with the mages because I felt Meredith had no right to invoke the right of annulment because frankly, the circle hadn't done anything. I supported the mages only to find out there's hardly any NON bloodmages in kirkwall. To say meredith is not insane however would be going too far. Even before she fell completely under the power of the idol sword (or whatever the proper name is) she was completely paranoid in all of act 3. And even before that she ruled the mages with an iron fist, she should've known the mages would not take this abuse indefinetly. I wish she was more like greagoir -- He's cool:pinched:
Modifié par Robhuzz, 07 avril 2011 - 12:25 .
#7
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:25
Plus, she has a damn sexy voice!
#8
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:28
Ferretinabun wrote...
Okay, maybe calling the Right of Annulment for the chantry's destruction when the real culprit is standing right beside her is a tad on the whacko side (not to mention, rather funny), but I'd say her paranoia is pretty much justified given that blood mages crop up like cockroaches in DA2.
Plus, she has a damn sexy voice!
I spotted a potential plot hole there. If you remember in DAO there was a templar in the elven alienage, able to sense the presence of demons and blood magic. How is it then that there were so many blood mages and demons in Kirkwall and none of the templars ever seemed to do something about it.
This is just a very difficult conflict because the mages will continue to use blood magic as they see it's the only way to win against the templars. And as long as mages turn to blood magic the templars will continue to purge them. It just seems like an endless cycle until mages either stop using blood magic or the templars stop caring (The latter is not going to happen and the former is also rather unlikely)
#9
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:29
To some degree i agree that the idol-sword was unneccessary. As was Orsino's sudden turn to blood magic and his cooperation with Quentin. The writers tried to make things a little more "gray", i think in this case they overdid it somewhat.
#10
Guest_m14567_*
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:31
Guest_m14567_*
#11
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:34
#12
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:34
And at least in her brand of crazy she actually THOUGHT she was defending people from a dangerous threat (the blood mages).
The fact that Orsino was actively HIDING blood mages from her kind of pooched the deal for feeling any empathy for him. He practically boasts about hiding Quinton right to Hawke's face if you side Templars. He played one against the other so long, he was no saint either. Then he becomes this giant blood magic blob creature and you get to kill him.
At that point, neither side are angels/wrong/right more than the other. My Hawke's viewpoint is: Try to minimalize casualties and save her sibling (either as a templar or a Circle mage). Beyond that, hey, I'd lock them in the gallows and let them fight till they kill each other off. Game doesn't give you that option though so you have to choose one or the other. Frankly I got more satisfaction siding with the templars because you actually GET a cutscene where you can force her to spare some of the mages, and you can walk into a room where you see templars/mages all hiding/praying with each other.
#13
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:39
#14
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 12:55
After each play through my idea of siding with templars is lesser evil of two choices getting stronger. Wheter you are a mage or other class there are plenty of reasons to side with templars. Only reason for siding with mages is fanatism. At least this is how I feel.
Modifié par Asperius, 07 avril 2011 - 12:55 .
#15
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 01:16
#16
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 01:35
#17
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 01:38
Modifié par Wulfram, 07 avril 2011 - 01:39 .
#18
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 01:39
Icy Magebane wrote...
The Right of Annulment is not murder. It is part of their job to ensure that the world is safe from abominations, and it is the last resort when the Circle is compromised. Whatever prompted her initiation of the Right, be it the Idol or Anders, the Kirkwall Circle was clearly overrun with blood mages. Pretty much every mage you meet turns out to be willing to become an abomination when backed into a corner. She did what she had to do.
Take it away Sten.
Sten: No.
#19
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 01:41
Icy Magebane wrote...
The Right of Annulment is not murder. It is part of their job to ensure that the world is safe from abominations, and it is the last resort when the Circle is compromised. Whatever prompted her initiation of the Right, be it the Idol or Anders, the Kirkwall Circle was clearly overrun with blood mages. Pretty much every mage you meet turns out to be willing to become an abomination when backed into a corner. She did what she had to do.
Pretty much every torrent user pirates sofware or music (assumption!), so let's jail them all...
#20
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 01:46
Icy Magebane wrote...
The Right of Annulment is not murder. It is part of their job to ensure that the world is safe from abominations, and it is the last resort when the Circle is compromised. Whatever prompted her initiation of the Right, be it the Idol or Anders, the Kirkwall Circle was clearly overrun with blood mages. Pretty much every mage you meet turns out to be willing to become an abomination when backed into a corner. She did what she had to do.
It's murder. In fact it's genocide. In fact when you see the battlescenes almot all of the mages within DO NOT become abominations and DO NOT use bloodmagic even when their lives depend on it.
Even using the Rite in Fereldan would have been wrong, but at least a very justifiable case there can be made that demons had taken over, the country was in peril,and thus extreme measures were needed.
At no time is there any suggestion that the mages in Kirkwall are any immediate threat to the city, the templars, or themselves after the Chantry is bombed. Fact is Meridith practially dances with glee at the prospect of slaughtering mages and if you go pro-templar or listen to the Templar chats, you learn that she had been constantly asking for the Rite (and having Elthina turn her down) for a while. Even Knight-Captain Cullen thinks the Rite is unjustified, and that's saying quite a lot.
-Polaris
#21
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 02:00
If Meredith isn't insane, then why does she start flipping out on Cullen and screaming that her templars are under the influence of blood magic just because they disagree with her bat-**** crazy plan to slaughter all the mages?
Cullen, unlike Meredith, has seen first-hand the horror blood magic can cause and has endured mental torture at the hands of demons. The destruction and murder he witnessed was on a much larger scale than what happened to Meredith. If he thinks she's nuts, then she's nuts.
Modifié par Plaintiff, 07 avril 2011 - 02:01 .
#22
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 02:00
If anything, Cullen disagreed simply because he thought Meredith was becoming too extreme, but I don't remember him preventing Hawke from killing the "innocent" mages in Act 3. The Idol's influence was at play, making Meredith unstable, but this doesn't mean the Right of Annulment is somehow unethical. The Templars purge the entire Circle because leaving survivors would only invite revenge, and because it is not obvious who is or who isn't an abomination. So again I ask, what are you supposed to do... wait until somebody gets killed before you act?
#23
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 02:05
Plaintiff wrote...
If Meredith isn't insane, then why does she start flipping out on Cullen and screaming that her templars are under the influence of blood magic just because they disagree with her bat-**** crazy plan to slaughter all the mages?
You even see some foreshadowing of this very point. If you sided with the Templars at the start of Act 3 AND did "On the Loose" pro-templar style (and having Meridith spare Emil is still considered pro-templar), then Meridith (not Orisino) will give you the quest, "Best Served Cold" and she gives it so you can find information implicating Orsino in a plot against her (which will be the final evidence she needs...or so she thinks..to have the Grand Cleric authorize a Rite of Annulment).
In the end, after you do the quest, you tell her that she isn't popular and even many of her own templars have gone against her. She responds that the only way Templars would abandon her would be by bloodmagic.
That's nuts....and at point well before the end of Act 3, even if you are pro-templar, you see she is LOOONEY TUNES.....
-Polaris
#24
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 02:07
You might try what other societies do. Treat mages like human beings with a dangerous but useful gift that needs to be nutured, trained, and well regulated.
But no, the Chantry can't be bothered to treat mages like human beings......
-Polaris
#25
Posté 07 avril 2011 - 02:08
Also, there is no real-world equivalent to this so... what should I be basing my ideas on? Nowhere on Earth will you find humans in any situation comparable to mages.
And one more thing... I never said that the abuses of the Kirkwall Templars were justified. I said that the Right is appropriate in some instances. The Ferelden Circle was a good example of how it should be.
Modifié par Icy Magebane, 07 avril 2011 - 02:10 .





Retour en haut







