Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...
Okay, ... small question. Why can't people just say "It is probably not significant enough to have any impact either way, so I am indifferent." instead of resorting to things like selfishness and trolling.
Selfish? You're the one trying to speak for a company on a project you have no knowledge about,
deliberately making snide and inappropriate assumptions about people you don't know (i.e. fans you've never met who've not purchased ME 1) and then pretending that your opinions are fact. Definitely selfish, and guaranteed to generate unspoken negativity from people, which is what trolls do.
Saying you don't like something is alot different from making claims about the thing you don't like - not to mention, haven't even experienced yet for yourself!
I have understood your reasonings and I have mine. But what some of you are essentially doing is to downplay mine with calling me selfish, de facto depriving me of any credibility in my opinion with such choice of word.
All you are saying is it won't have a big impact. I think that too.
Just contradicted yourself. If it won't have a big impact then it's not a waste of time or a detriment to the development potential of the game itself. With a logic like this, I don't have to downplay you. Don't like that word? Fine. You are substantially inconsiderate about the feelings of others by assuming your opinions are fact.
Nontheless, I think the impact would still be beneficial. You don't think as such or think the otherway round would be more beneficial. Nowhere in there is rightfully place for calling me selfish. I have my opinion, I want the game to be as good as possible and have as least possible strains as manageable.
No, I simply don't think you have the evidence to make that claim, therefore necessitating a criticism of your argument. Which, is contradictory again.
You have yet not come up with an objective fact that counters mine (no one can say that an additional comic does not bind ressources) other than to guess it would have too tiny an impact to actually act as such. Instead you resort to means like calling me a troll and selfish for having my opinion.
Your statement wasn't fact, and you clearly don't understand basic economics when it comes to developing a project. Certain amounts of money are allocated to each aspect of a product, be it advertising, development, paying for voice actors, etc. The money being used to make the comic already was set aside for the express purpose of that most likely.
Also, since you were the one who's projecting all this information on the development of ME3, the burden of proof falls on
you. Cite some sources please.
I have a fact, even though it is unclear on how farreaching its impact is, it remains a fact.
I wish Dean could see how ridiculous this statement is.
No you don't have facts, but assumptions. If it were draining resources that would mean that funds designed specifically for other projects were being allocated to this project, and that the funds specifically allocated to the comic section were unfeasable. Again, opinion, not fact. Unless you can cite it.
And just as I don't have the authority to speak for other people than me, so do you per se not have the authority to speak for anyone else but yourself too.
I am speaking for myself. However, I also noted the people who've been commenting on this thread who agreed with me. Can you do that in reference to your claims? Certainly not, since those lazy folk you saw are probably too irresponsible to voice their own opinion.
Modifié par Rekkampum, 08 avril 2011 - 06:27 .
Retour en haut
