Aller au contenu

Photo

Anders's conduct during the "Alone" quest...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
120 réponses à ce sujet

#51
PlumPaul93

PlumPaul93
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages

Auroras wrote...

Sarielle wrote...

Auroras wrote...

PlumPaul82393 wrote...

He's a ****** and a hypocrite that whines if you don't do whatever he wants not really surprising.


This.

He complained and handed me a whopping +30 rivalry, just because I refused to help him distract the Grand Cleric. It just seemed suspicious. During his pity fest, he accused me of hating mages. I was playing as a mage.

I wish there was a slap Anders mod. 


Lol, do you really take that big of a rivalry hit? I was pretty sure I didn't get that -- or at least, not that big. Then again I made no attempt to max friendship/rivalry with anyone my first playthough, so I didn't pay attention as much.

I'm almost positive he didn't accuse me of hating mages, because I was one and I'd have had a "wtf" moment too.


Not of hating mages, per se, but of my support of mages only being talk, blah blah blah. D:


Well it doesn't matter what a whiner says he just wants to whine Image IPB

#52
Oneiropolos

Oneiropolos
  • Members
  • 316 messages
Yep, Anders totally acts like you've been playacting this entire time and woe is him, you clearly just didn't CARE as much as he does, and he was WRONG about you and think of the poor kittens... I mean... mages.. you just don't LOVE. Then he blows up a chantry and condemns a bunch of mages to death because he KNEW that would be the reaction, and he had to get rid of compromise. Because he LOVES THE KITTENS I MEAN MAGES! (...at that point, he's insane enough that Hawke clearly needed to be a bit brighter. If Hawke had just gone, "But Anders, if you do anything drastic, some kittens might die in the confusion!" Anders would have been all D: And demanded Justice figure out another way.)

#53
Mariquis

Mariquis
  • Members
  • 201 messages

PlumPaul82393 wrote...

Alamar2078 wrote...

Halo Quea wrote...
Anders spends a great deal of time verbally attacking Merrill but the whole time he was planning to do something worse than any abomination would have been able to accomplish on it's own.  


I interpret him attacking Merrill as feeling guilty himself knowing that merging with Justice was going to lead to a very bad place.  He was just attacking her because he hated falling into the same trap.

Maybe I've giving the writer too much credit on this one but I thought that was a very good touch ....


no I just think its because anders is a hypocrite JMO.


I'd have to disagree. I really see Anders as wanting to steer Merrill away from a dangerous path, but not really knowing how to go about it (probably on account of his own deteriorating mental state and maybe awareness of his own terrible mistake). Some of the banter's in particular between Merril and Anders later on  for example:

 Anders describes in detail how it feels to be possessed and not in control of one's own body. Merrill cuts him off and says "Stop it, you're scaring me!"  And he simply replies, "That's the point."  Or another dialogue where he laments almost killing Ella, and when she says "I'm so sorry" he goes "What?  You're sorry? This could be you!"

With Merrill I find he often uses himself as an example in order to scare her away from a more dangerous path, because she seems to be too headstrong/views herself as being too capable/too knowledgeable to acknowledge it.  Anders himself fell into that exact same trap.  

I think Anders (in this quest specifically) is just going a tad batty, and harbours personal dislike for Fenris.  He and Fenris were always at each other's throats, when he's in the state that he is in Act 3, it's not surprising to see it expressed in such an impolitic manner.

#54
PlumPaul93

PlumPaul93
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages

Mariquis wrote...

PlumPaul82393 wrote...

Alamar2078 wrote...

Halo Quea wrote...
Anders spends a great deal of time verbally attacking Merrill but the whole time he was planning to do something worse than any abomination would have been able to accomplish on it's own.  


I interpret him attacking Merrill as feeling guilty himself knowing that merging with Justice was going to lead to a very bad place.  He was just attacking her because he hated falling into the same trap.

Maybe I've giving the writer too much credit on this one but I thought that was a very good touch ....


no I just think its because anders is a hypocrite JMO.


I'd have to disagree. I really see Anders as wanting to steer Merrill away from a dangerous path, but not really knowing how to go about it (probably on account of his own deteriorating mental state and maybe awareness of his own terrible mistake). Some of the banter's in particular between Merril and Anders later on  for example:

 Anders describes in detail how it feels to be possessed and not in control of one's own body. Merrill cuts him off and says "Stop it, you're scaring me!"  And he simply replies, "That's the point."  Or another dialogue where he laments almost killing Ella, and when she says "I'm so sorry" he goes "What?  You're sorry? This could be you!"

With Merrill I find he often uses himself as an example in order to scare her away from a more dangerous path, because she seems to be too headstrong/views herself as being too capable/too knowledgeable to acknowledge it.  Anders himself fell into that exact same trap.  

I think Anders (in this quest specifically) is just going a tad batty, and harbours personal dislike for Fenris.  He and Fenris were always at each other's throats, when he's in the state that he is in Act 3, it's not surprising to see it expressed in such an impolitic manner.


I still don't think him not liking fenris justifies the +5 friendship for sending fenris to be a slave especially since he always whines about mages being slaves. And on the merril thing that's fine if he want's to sway her to a different path but insulting her and criticizing her every chance he gets is not helping. And I don't like fenris or merril myself.

#55
trobbins777

trobbins777
  • Members
  • 494 messages
Anders admits that though he disagrees with Meredith she does believe what she's doing is right. Just as well Fenris says that there are mages with good intentions. Both are good men

#56
Mariquis

Mariquis
  • Members
  • 201 messages

PlumPaul82393 wrote...

Mariquis wrote...

PlumPaul82393 wrote...

Alamar2078 wrote...

Halo Quea wrote...
Anders spends a great deal of time verbally attacking Merrill but the whole time he was planning to do something worse than any abomination would have been able to accomplish on it's own.  


I interpret him attacking Merrill as feeling guilty himself knowing that merging with Justice was going to lead to a very bad place.  He was just attacking her because he hated falling into the same trap.

Maybe I've giving the writer too much credit on this one but I thought that was a very good touch ....


no I just think its because anders is a hypocrite JMO.


*snip*


I still don't think him not liking fenris justifies the +5 friendship for sending fenris to be a slave especially since he always whines about mages being slaves. And on the merril thing that's fine if he want's to sway her to a different path but insulting her and criticizing her every chance he gets is not helping. And I don't like fenris or merril myself.


I've never seen that interaction (I was referring to the "Your sister is a mage? You really ARE jealous!"), but I honestly think it can be summed up by "half crazy Anders hating fenris very much." I can't really claim to know his justification, but I imagine it was something like "Hate on mages all the time? Serves you right that you're sent back to your mage master!"  Does it make him a good person...? No.  But it also doesn't make him a slaver, it just makes him angry, petty and most of all human.

I'd almost say that Anders doesnt' really know/acknowledge what being a slave entails, much the same way that Fenris won't/can't acknowledge the inustice of circle mages.

Insofar as hating on Merril, he doesn't actually hate on her much more than anyone else. Everyone kind of dances around Merrill because she's so naive (even Aveline calls her stupid to her face). Here's a link to all their banters:   He criticizes her choices a LOT, but he never actually outright attacks her as a person.

#57
RubiconI7

RubiconI7
  • Members
  • 409 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

It's not like Fenris is any less of a douche, really. You should take him and Anders along on A New Path and watch how they gang up on Merrill as she sobs over Marethari's corpse.

I think you're wrong when you say the Circle is "nothing like slavery". In practise perhaps, there are some differences, but the mentality is essentially the same: that the people suffering aren't really human, they're objects. Cullen even says as much.

Notice that when Anders makes the comaprison between the Circle and slavery, Fenris does not dispute the point, he simply says he doesn't care about mages. And in Act 3, if you side with the mages and Fenris sides with the templars, you get the option to convince him a second time to come back to your side, and depending on various factors, the line you use will vary, but one possibility is something along the tone of "I thought you were against slavery", and that will sway his opinion.

So the parallels may not be obvious to you but they are obvious to Fenris.

I'd also point out that in Act 1, Anders disapproves if you threaten to blackmail Thrask about his daughter, while Fenris is the only party member who approves, and does so purely out of hatred for mages. Anders also openly abhors blood magic, saying that giving into demons is just proving the templars right.


I don't believe that Fenris being a dick can make what Anders does any better. I do think however, that Justice's transformation to Vengeance is gradual and subtle as intended and that his hatred, hypocrisy and general unstable mentality only gets worse as he sees things with Justice's standards and beliefs which pushes him towards V ever closer.

The fact that we know not every Circle is as "bad" as the Kirkwall Circle and the fact that Anders forces his beliefs onto everyone by his act of destroying the Chantry only serves as a reminder of his ever more disaffected heart towards anything that is not a "mage being oppressed". Anything that is not mage can be fairly screwed over.

#58
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages
I think this is just a matter of cramming in as many Friendship/Rivalry opportunities as they can, for those who didn't manage to max out the entire party by the end of Act 1. It's kind of unfair to place the spotlight on Anders, ALL the characters have their jerkass moments. Merrill takes a rivalry hit if you turn down Torpor's deal in Night Terrors. She is AGAINST saving Feynriel from becoming an abomination. Even given her past association with demons, that still makes her kind of a ****.

#59
PlumPaul93

PlumPaul93
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

I think this is just a matter of cramming in as many Friendship/Rivalry opportunities as they can, for those who didn't manage to max out the entire party by the end of Act 1. It's kind of unfair to place the spotlight on Anders, ALL the characters have their jerkass moments. Merrill takes a rivalry hit if you turn down Torpor's deal in Night Terrors. She is AGAINST saving Feynriel from becoming an abomination. Even given her past association with demons, that still makes her kind of a ****.


That didn't happen to me you probably got rivalry for saying to the keeper you would kill him if you had to, I reloaded after getting rivalry and said I wouldn't kill him and I got friendship

Modifié par PlumPaul82393, 09 avril 2011 - 06:23 .


#60
trobbins777

trobbins777
  • Members
  • 494 messages
Isn't it kind of hypocritical that the chantry reviles slavery and yet treats a certain group of people like they are the scum, literally and metaphorically rape them, and imprison/kill any of them that disagree or anyone who tries to help them escape from a prison?

Let's face it people Anders didn't just wake up one day and say "You know that chantry really is an eyesore. I should do something about it." Things escalated over time. Over the period of six years his anger grows from all the evil things he see's the templars doing. You guys have to admit the templars are a couple red armbands away from (and i hate to use this analogy) not z's(misspelling) . Especially with the whole tranquil solution thing.

Modifié par trobbins777, 09 avril 2011 - 06:32 .


#61
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

I think this is just a matter of cramming in as many Friendship/Rivalry opportunities as they can, for those who didn't manage to max out the entire party by the end of Act 1. It's kind of unfair to place the spotlight on Anders, ALL the characters have their jerkass moments. Merrill takes a rivalry hit if you turn down Torpor's deal in Night Terrors. She is AGAINST saving Feynriel from becoming an abomination. Even given her past association with demons, that still makes her kind of a ****.


Actually you get  +10 rivalry from Merrill if you even have her in the party when you accept this quest from the Keeper.  Why?  Deep insecurity and resentment that the Keeper would go the extra-mile to save an Elf-Blooded human, when she couldn't even be bothered to give Merrill, a full member of the Elvenhn, a fair hearing to restore a precious part of their history,and IMHO it colors her reactons the entire quest.

My advice.  Leave Merrill at home for this one. She has too many insecurties working against her because of the above to make her a good choicefor this mission.

-Polaris

#62
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

PlumPaul82393 wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

I think this is just a matter of cramming in as many Friendship/Rivalry opportunities as they can, for those who didn't manage to max out the entire party by the end of Act 1. It's kind of unfair to place the spotlight on Anders, ALL the characters have their jerkass moments. Merrill takes a rivalry hit if you turn down Torpor's deal in Night Terrors. She is AGAINST saving Feynriel from becoming an abomination. Even given her past association with demons, that still makes her kind of a ****.


That didn't happen to me you probably got rivalry for saying to the keeper you would kill him if you had to, I reloaded after getting rivalry and said I wouldn't kill him and I got friendship

See for yourself: dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Night_Terrors

Merrill takes a Rivalry hit for rejecting Torpor's offer out of hand. If you hear him out and then reject him, there's no change. But if you accept the offer, regardless of whether or not you choose to hear him out, you get +5 Friendship.

So Merrill is actually endorsing the decision to totally screw over not only a fellow mage, but also a member of her clan. I think this and the OP's example  are cases of the writers or developers or whoever over-simplifying the character. They took one aspect of their personality (Merrill likes demons, Anders hates Fenris, etc), and ran with it without considering other factors.

Modifié par Plaintiff, 09 avril 2011 - 06:50 .


#63
PlumPaul93

PlumPaul93
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

PlumPaul82393 wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

I think this is just a matter of cramming in as many Friendship/Rivalry opportunities as they can, for those who didn't manage to max out the entire party by the end of Act 1. It's kind of unfair to place the spotlight on Anders, ALL the characters have their jerkass moments. Merrill takes a rivalry hit if you turn down Torpor's deal in Night Terrors. She is AGAINST saving Feynriel from becoming an abomination. Even given her past association with demons, that still makes her kind of a ****.


That didn't happen to me you probably got rivalry for saying to the keeper you would kill him if you had to, I reloaded after getting rivalry and said I wouldn't kill him and I got friendship

See for yourself: dragonage.wikia.com/wiki/Night_Terrors

Merrill takes a Rivalry hit for rejecting Torpor's offer out of hand. If you hear him out and then reject him, there's no change. But if you accept the offer, regardless of whether or not you choose to hear him out, you get +5 Friendship.

So Merrill is actually endorsing the decision to totally screw over not only a fellow mage, but also a member of her clan. I think this and the OP's example  are cases of the writers or developers or whoever over-simplifying then character. They took one aspect of their personality (Merrill likes demons, Anders hates Fenris, etc), and ran without without considering other factors.


This is what I was referring to: The other option "I can't do that", Image IPB Anders: friendship (+5), Image IPB Merill: friendship (+5), Image IPB Sebastian: rivalry (+10). Not doing stuff while in the fade.

#64
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 419 messages
Uh...yes yes you do get rivalry from Merrill for killing the demon. I listened to his offer (even got past the point where Anders attacked me). And then I refused at the last second. I still got rivalry.

#65
Oneiropolos

Oneiropolos
  • Members
  • 316 messages

trobbins777 wrote...

Isn't it kind of hypocritical that the chantry reviles slavery and yet treats a certain group of people like they are the scum, literally and metaphorically rape them, and imprison/kill any of them that disagree or anyone who tries to help them escape from a prison?

Let's face it people Anders didn't just wake up one day and say "You know that chantry really is an eyesore. I should do something about it." Things escalated over time. Over the period of six years his anger grows from all the evil things he see's the templars doing. You guys have to admit the templars are a couple red armbands away from (and i hate to use this analogy) not z's(misspelling) . Especially with the whole tranquil solution thing.


Well, in all fairness, the game itself sort of pokes at that anology. If you have Sebastian, he will iniate a conversation about that quest:

---
Sebastian: So your "Tranquil Solution" was hardly the holocaust you imagined.
Anders: You've been seeking revenge for the death of one family for as long as I've known you.
Anders: Are you honestly judging me for trying to save the lives of every mage in Thedas?
Sebastian: But they were never threatened. It was a single man's lunacy.
Sebastian: The Chantry would never follow through with such a thing.
Anders: Yet.
---

     The fact they gave Sebastian such a word as "holocaust"... there's a power in words and that is an extremely loaded one despite the fact the word comes from Ancient Greek. It's not what a modern audience immediately thinks of. As much as people might hate Sebastian (I don't personally, I just know people do), he's not incorrect there. And Anders makes a fair jab at Sebastian's focus on revenge. Sebastian's comment  "But they (every mage in Thedas) were never threatened. It was a single man's lunacy." is...well. Again. Looking through dialogues I'm beginning to wonder at how -much- the other characters unknowingly foreshadow what Anders will do. I may start a thread devoted purely to that when my head isn't hurting so badly because it's fascinating in a literary sense and I'm SURE I didn't notice some. A single man's lunacy endangers the lives of all mages and puts the world at the brink of war. Of course, one could argue it wasn't JUST his lunacy, because there are reasons he reached his conclusion...NO ONE in the situation and I mean NO ONE comes out smelling free of lunacy or corruption. Not the Chantry. Not the Mage Towers. Not the Templars. Not the nobility. Not the Seekers. Not even your normal peasant. And especially not Hawke. There's a quote from Sir Terry Pratchett that essentially says, "They do evil not because they say yes, but because they don't say no." (I don't have the exact quote in front of me, it's from Guards! Guards!, Vetinari says it). 

Even She-who-does-not-want-to-get-involved-thank-you-very-much foreshadows future events.

---
Anders: There is justice in the world.
Isabela: Is there? You want to free the mages. Let's say you do, but to get there, you kill a bunch of innocent people.
Isabela: What about them? Don't they then deserve justice?
Anders: Yes.
Isabela: And then what? Where does it end?
Isabela: It's like a bar brawl. People are continuously pulled into the fray, and nobody remembers why it started.
Isabela: Justice is an idea. It makes sense in a world of ideas, but not in our world.
----

:mellow: I hadn't seen that dialogue until just now. And I sat there going "...did she really say that? Did Varric just say she said that just to make his best drinking buddy look good? Because that is the most accurate description of what is going on at the time Varric is being questioned that I've seen..." Of course, didn't Isabela say her mother was a fake fortuneteller? Maybe Isabela inherited some not-so-fake-after-all ability and just doesn't know it. :D

Modifié par Oneiropolos, 09 avril 2011 - 07:05 .


#66
sylvanaerie

sylvanaerie
  • Members
  • 9 436 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Uh...yes yes you do get rivalry from Merrill for killing the demon. I listened to his offer (even got past the point where Anders attacked me). And then I refused at the last second. I still got rivalry.


I think I want to rivalry her next playthrough but being a dick to Merrill is like kicking a small puppy no matter how much I want to do it.  I'll need to find places in game where I can get rivalry by doing the things that won't be like kicking a small puppy and this is one of them.
Also, in the Deep Roads if you don't deal with the Hunger Demon she will take a rivalry hit. However, if you ask her to deal with it (kill it), she either doesn't or gains friendship (I forget which).

#67
Mnemnosyne

Mnemnosyne
  • Members
  • 859 messages

shantisands wrote...

Oh, as for the OP's feeling on Anders and Fenris' sister....   I really honestly just saw it as a " OMG you big hater! You were jealous of your sister and used that hatred of her powers and your magisters to blame all magic forever!"  No matter how short-sighted he had become, to ME, at the time anyway.... it seemed more like a DING DING! I understand this now, its a sibling rivalry/fear thing.    I could be wrong, and perhaps I was wishful thinking at the time, but that is how it came across to me.

That makes no sense, Fenris didn't know he had a sister and didn't know she was a mage when he started hating mages, so she could not have had an effect on his hatred of mages.

Plaintiff wrote...

The Dalish give their mages positions
of incredible responsibility and not one of them that we've seen has
turned into an abomination ever. Even Merrill, who is a blood
mage, has never harmed anyone except in self defense. Why? Because the
Dalish treat their mages with at least a basic level of respect and they
are taught to embrace their powers for the ways in which they could
help people.

While I agree with most of your points here, umm, the Dalish really aren't a good example overall.  Sure, we have Lanaya and Merrill as good examples, but we also have Zathrian and Marethari as bad examples, so our history with Dalish Keepers is...not good.

stobie wrote...

Thinking Anders a complete jerk over this,
however, doesn't make the Chantry any better. There's a line the Old
Cleric can say, if you point out that the hero of Ferelden defeated the
blight, not the Maker,' and she'll say something like, "The Maker
can work EVEN through an elf.. or mage, or whatever you are..." Scabby
old bat! I was particularly annoyed when she gave her 'even an elf'
speech, after my nice boy City Elf did all this good!

I actually found that one of the most infuriating moments.  Her own religion preaches that the Maker has abandoned us, and worse, preaches that our own acts caused the Maker to turn his back on us.  If we can be responsible for our failures then we damn well better own our successes, and she demeans the Warden and all of us by even suggesting that the Maker was responsible.  I really wish there had been a chance to retort to her bull****, in any way.

Mariquis wrote...

With Merrill I find he often uses
himself as an example in order to scare her away from a more dangerous
path, because she seems to be too headstrong/views herself as being too
capable/too knowledgeable to acknowledge it.  Anders himself fell into
that exact same trap.

He voluntarily joined with a spirit out of the belief that spirits are benevolent and good, as opposed to demons.  Merrill understands the situation better and would never be that foolish - she knows that spirit, demon, they are all dangerous and would never voluntarily do that.  She is willing to do risky things, but she also seems to fully understand and acknowledge their risks, unlike Anders, who didn't truly understand what he was doing.

Plaintiff wrote...

I think this is just a matter of
cramming in as many Friendship/Rivalry opportunities as they can, for
those who didn't manage to max out the entire party by the end of Act 1.
It's kind of unfair to place the spotlight on Anders, ALL the
characters have their jerkass moments. Merrill takes a rivalry hit if
you turn down Torpor's deal in Night Terrors. She is AGAINST saving
Feynriel from becoming an abomination. Even given her past association
with demons, that still makes her kind of a ****.

This rivalry hit to Merrill is at odds with her actual dialogue, which says 'I don't think we should be doing this' or something pretty close to that.  I believe it is an error, in that there is only one option to exit that conversation without agreeing to Torpor's deal.  Unfortunately it is the same option to exit the conversation as is used if you don't hear him out.  Merrill hates it when people don't at least hear out demons.

Conversely, from the OP's descriptions (I have not seen that conversation personally), Anders actually supports giving Fenris to Danarius in dialogue rather than merely through approval.

As far as the original question, I agree with the point that Anders really isn't Anders, he's a vengeance abomination at that point.  And vengeance really fits with enjoying anything bad happen to his personal hated foe, even if he would otherwise disagree with it.  He hates Fenris, so anything bad that happens to Fenris makes him happy.

#68
Sabariel

Sabariel
  • Members
  • 2 826 messages
******, ******, ******. None of the other companions actually stop Hawke from handing Fenris over. They make their "mad face" then let it happen. They're no better.

#69
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

sylvanaerie wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

Uh...yes yes you do get rivalry from Merrill for killing the demon. I listened to his offer (even got past the point where Anders attacked me). And then I refused at the last second. I still got rivalry.


I think I want to rivalry her next playthrough but being a dick to Merrill is like kicking a small puppy no matter how much I want to do it.  I'll need to find places in game where I can get rivalry by doing the things that won't be like kicking a small puppy and this is one of them.
Also, in the Deep Roads if you don't deal with the Hunger Demon she will take a rivalry hit. However, if you ask her to deal with it (kill it), she either doesn't or gains friendship (I forget which).


Actually I've found you can get 40+ points of Rivalry with Merrill without being a donkey's posterior wih Merrill on that quest, and if you spare Tarone (sp?) in the act before, you can get an easy pain-free +50 rivalry more from Merrill just for trashing those books (+10 per book).   Together that should be enough to easily max out Merrill on Rivalry.

Just by having Merrill in the party when you talk to the Keeper and take the quest, you get +10 Rivalry because Merrill is jealous of the attention Fenyriel is getting.  If you immediately attack Torpor you get +5 or +10 more.  When you meet the pride demon, the pride demon targets Merrill first off.  If you choose the diplomatic option to try to keep Merrill loyal, you get a whopping +20 Rivalry increase (it's only +10 if you threaten her).  You can get even more if you tell her that if she betrays you again she dies afterwards.

-Polaris

#70
IanPolaris

IanPolaris
  • Members
  • 9 650 messages

Koyasha wrote...

[While I agree with most of your points here, umm, the Dalish really aren't a good example overall.  Sure, we have Lanaya and Merrill as good examples, but we also have Zathrian and Marethari as bad examples, so our history with Dalish Keepers is...not good.


Disagree.  Both Zathrien and Merethari are spendid examples.  Zathrien is an open bloodmage who performed an incredibly difficult and dangerous act of summoning when he made the curse and he did so without becoming an abomination even where the veil was extremely thin (Brecilian Forest) and did so in a way that did not harm his clan for centuries.  If the human bloodmages we run into in Kirkwall had even a tenth of Zathrien's control and discipline, no one would know that there were any bloodmages in Kirkwall, thin veil or not.

As for Merethari, she clearly would have had the power to fight the demon in the fade and win, but because the demon is trapped, that wasn't an option.  She ALLOWED the demon to enter her and was STILL able to keep enough control to set up a situation where Merrill and Hawke could execute her and thus kill the Demon too.  That takes incredible will, devotion, and magical skill.

-Polaris

#71
sylvanaerie

sylvanaerie
  • Members
  • 9 436 messages
I know you can also get Rivalry if you keep the arulin'holm from her too in her Act 2 quest and tell her its all her fault when Marithari dies picking up more rivalry. After denying her the tool, she acts all childish and angry and then somehow manages to either build it without the tool or steals it from you at some point. I can do that i think because personally I think her mission is crazy. Not the reasoning behind it, because she just wants to help her people by restoring their past, just the way she is going about it is insane.
I wonder if everyone in Kirkwall is fruit loops (I really LIKE that description) because of the weakened Veil there?

#72
Deztyn

Deztyn
  • Members
  • 885 messages
Ugh. The jealous line was so irritating, I wanted to scream at Anders and remind him that he'd been there when Fenris found out he had a sister.

I also took Fenris with me during Dissent and the after conversation with Anders. Fenris was pretty civil to Anders by comparison. I don't have the quotes handy, but there was no malice and no "I told you so" which actually surprised me since Anders killed Ella this playthrough.

Conclusion: Fenris can be a jerk to Anders. Anders is a much bigger jerk to Fenris.

#73
Mayorin

Mayorin
  • Members
  • 27 messages
Well, to be fair, if there was a quest to sell out Anders to templars to make him tranquil, Fenris would be the first in line to give Hawke friendship points for this.

#74
sassperella

sassperella
  • Members
  • 838 messages

Deified Data wrote...

FYI, this is the quest where Fenris is led into an ambush in the Hanged Man by his sister, who is revealed to be a magister-apprentice and a servant of Denarius. There are multiple paths through this quest, with the two biggest choices being whether to sell Fenris back into slavery, or whether to spare the life of Fenris's sister. This thread concerns Anders's reactions to a couple of the choices you can make, and their implications.

First, you are given the opportunity to sell Fenris back to Denarius. If you decide to do so, Anders will respond with something along the lines of "I'm glad I wasn't the only one thinking that" - after the scene, you will gain +5 friendship with Anders for selling Fenris back into slavery.

Second, you are given the choice to spare Fenris's sister, who betrayed him by leading him into Denarius's trap. Fenris's first inclination is to kill her for betraying him and sympathizing Denarius - whether he is "right" in this I will not argue here. However, once it is revealed that Fenris's sister is a mage, Anders calls Fenris a hypocrite for wanting to kill her, and says, and I quote: "You're just jealous (of her)". Killing this betrayer only becomes a bad thing to Anders once it is revealed she's a mage, as though that changes everything.

For someone who's spent his entire life under oppression (and being possessed by a spirit of justice, besides), Anders displays a remarkable lack of respect for human life and freedom. He fights for the freedom of mages while virtually cheering you on as you sell a non-mage into slavery. Is it "justice" to sell a man into slavery just because he doesn't agree with your political opinions? Is someone instantly forgiven of all trespasses just because they're a mage?

I'll be honest - Anders earned alot of flack from me when he blew up the Chantry, but this blatant hypocracy and sadism on his part puts him over the edge between "mild nuisance" and "inhuman monster". Can any Anders fans justify what he did, here? Why would justice manifest itself in such an injust way? Is there absolutely nothing left but vengeance inside Anders by Act III?


To get the comment about selling Fenris back into slavery Hawke has to be an even bigger douche and hand Fenris over. I never had that dialog because my Hawke wasn't a douche....

So moral Is if Hawke is a douche then Anders can be too. How can players be appalled at Anders' reactions to a heinous action they themselves took in the first place?  :blink:

#75
Rifneno

Rifneno
  • Members
  • 12 076 messages

Sesshomaru47 wrote...

He accused my mage of being a mage hater, well turning against my "own kind". To be honest she wasn't all that pro-mage anyway.
Just do the quest it makes killing him in the end all the more worth while. That is if you plan to kill him I guess.


How was he wrong again?  I've read your posts, you DID turn against your own kind.

Asdara wrote...

I do think that it is telling that Fenris won't betray YOU though - when Sebastian recommends turning Merill and Anders (the mages) in as apostates to Fenris he says something like "you clear it with Hawke if you want that to happen." Unlike Anders, who blows people up and involves you if you let him, unknowningly.


Yes he will.  If you don't have enough approval with him at the final mission, he'll side with Meredith's crew.  There are dialogue options to get him to rejoin, something about pointing out the Circle is similar to slavery.  But if you tell him "I'm not going to just let you just kill us all" he'll respond with "I'd be disappointed if you did" and attack Hawke.  It's very easy to avoid his betrayal, but yes, he WILL betray Hawke under some circumstances.

As for turning in the apostates in the group, the templars know Anders and Merrill are mages.  They just won't attempt to capture them with Hawke because... plot armor I guess.  Anders snaps at Cullen over something he says in Act II and Cullen shoots back "think what you want, mage."  In Act III when he backtalks Meredith, Meredith threatens him, "Your association with the Champion will only protect you so much, mage."  This isn't to say he'd turn them in given the chance, it's clear from that conversation he won't.  But I doubt it'd do much good if he did.

Sebastian?  Yeah, someone should murderknife him.

Mayorin wrote...

Well, to be fair, if there was a quest to sell out Anders to templars to make him tranquil, Fenris would be the first in line to give Hawke friendship points for this.


True story guys.  Excellent, excellent point.  These two just bitterly, bitterly hate each other.