184 réponses à ce sujet

[GeoffL19]

And if he's dead when Hawke stabs him with a knife, how did he survive being run through with a Templar-Warden's SWORD?

Does he have some sort of Achilles heel in his back?

[artsangel]

I got the feeling upon reading it again that he was immune to the sword when he was in glowy blue Justice-mode, but when he was stabbed by Hawke, he was just Anders, and thus not invincible.

[sheppard7]

Mooner911 wrote...

sheppard7 wrote...
Just when I thought Bioware couldn't have screwed up Anders any more than they did with DA2, did I read this crap. NOW I think Bioware can't screw him up anymore than they did. What's next? Retconning him back to life if he was stabbed in the heart from the back in the next game with the line from X-Men Origins: Wolverine, "It tickled"?
I was planning on maybe sparing him in my playthrough after the patch just to see what happens. But after reading that farce, he will always die and his legacy will be the same as Bin Ladin.

My Hawke got pig-stuck numerous times in the fight with the Qunari dude. Little Miss Merrill got pig-stuck bigtime on her quest to fix her mirror. We both lived and laughed about it. Anders gets a little shiv in the back and lays down for a while. No arguements from him, no big ugly Justice poppin out and scaring the kids... Anders aint dead. He just needed a plausable exit. Surprise!
Carry on BW...

He's dead, Jim.

Good riddance to bad rubbish of a character they screwed up.

[we02545]

He kills all those people, so killing him is the right choice.
Please drop this character from future DLC.
crystal necklace
crystal bracelet

[we02545]

Wait.. is this different to what was released a while back ?
crystal ring
crystal earrings

[Juggernaut241]

I loved Anders in DA2. He could get whiny, but given what hes been through in the game, Im sure others would be the same way. He makes a good story line for the romance aspect of two runaway fugitives in the end. Please dont kill him off bioware. I felt he helped make DA2 a great game.

[LadyVaJedi]

I don't want Anders dead either. I think he is a good character to as well. He has the most room for further storytelling.

[Brightarrow]

you cant make an omlet with out breaking a few eggs..............
Anders did something drastic to bring drastic change.
If you think about it all revolutions do this. America started with Revolution but we didnt kill the revolutionists when it was over! DONT kill Anders

[LadyVaJedi]

You tell em Brightarow

[Melca36]

Brightarrow wrote...

you cant make an omlet with out breaking a few eggs..............
Anders did something drastic to bring drastic change.
If you think about it all revolutions do this. America started with Revolution but we didnt kill the revolutionists when it was over! DONT kill Anders

I agree. 

One of my mage characters ran off with him. All those years of her family being on the run, remembering what Flemeth said. I roleplayed it as her agreeing with him.

America would still be owned by the British if we did not revolt.

Unfortunately alot of people confuse reality with how they game.

[Melca36]

we02545 wrote...

He kills all those people, so killing him is the right choice.
Please drop this character from future DLC.
crystal necklace
crystal bracelet

Spammer:sick:

[JontheJ3w]

Melca36 wrote...

Brightarrow wrote...

you cant make an omlet with out breaking a few eggs..............
Anders did something drastic to bring drastic change.
If you think about it all revolutions do this. America started with Revolution but we didnt kill the revolutionists when it was over! DONT kill Anders

I agree. 

One of my mage characters ran off with him. All those years of her family being on the run, remembering what Flemeth said. I roleplayed it as her agreeing with him.

America would still be owned by the British if we did not revolt.

Unfortunately alot of people confuse reality with how they game.

 Im Canadian we a just asked nicely. And im split between it. I mean technically the Circle doesnt have to have the templers there the Chantry just feels that they need to control mages. They allowed themselve to be treated like thos as Anders points out over and over again. And what did Cassandra mean at the end. The templars are revolting too why? isnt this what they always wanted. and the Warden His/Her role what is it and why just run off like that your the Hero. **** dont make sense

[dreadpiratesnugglecakes]

Please don't compare that terrorist lump of cr*p Anders to the American Revolution. You're leaving out the part where the mages once controlled all of Thedas and subjugated the entire population as slaves. The Chantry came about as the result of a revolution against the mages. Rather than kill them outright, the Chantry developed the circles. Apples and oranges. So stop justifying your sick fasicination with this stupid character by trying to make some moral equivalence.
First of all, what exactly did Anders accomplish by murdering all those people?

Der, he started a revolution, dat's what!

Ok, he started a revolution. Let's see..did the mages in Kirkwall want a revolution?

Der, no. Not really.

No, they didn't. See, butchering innocents at the chantry accomplished 2 things. One, it makes Meredith look sympathetic for her crackdowns because his lunancy tars the rest of the mages. Two, it reminds the average people in the street why the mages were locked up to begin with; because they are murderous uncontrollable pieces of human debris. Brilliant strategy.

Der, but it's like a revolution..der.

Yes, when you overthrow something; you have to put something in its place; if the population hates you because you just blew up half the city, you're going to have people revolting against your new Benign Mage Dictatorship.

Der but de mages need to be free der..der Chantry is evil! Der!

Um..yeah. Ever heard of the Tevinter Imperium?

Anders act was unnecessary; he could have achieved the same result by going after Meredith directly; she was the one causing all the friction; even the sane templars would have stood with him..and it still would have caused the same result..except without all the innocent dead people. But hey, why do something smart when you can do something stupid that kills a bunch of innocent people?

In addition, I think Anders doing what he did was out of character; he was a healer, and a soldier, and I think he could have come up with a better way to start his revolution.

Der, revolution! Der!

Yeah, whatever.

[Melca36]

dreadpiratesnugglecakes wrote...

Please don't compare that terrorist lump of cr*p Anders to the American Revolution. You're leaving out the part where the mages once controlled all of Thedas and subjugated the entire population as slaves. The Chantry came about as the result of a revolution against the mages. Rather than kill them outright, the Chantry developed the circles. Apples and oranges. So stop justifying your sick fasicination with this stupid character by trying to make some moral equivalence.
First of all, what exactly did Anders accomplish by murdering all those people?

Der, he started a revolution, dat's what!

Ok, he started a revolution. Let's see..did the mages in Kirkwall want a revolution?

Der, no. Not really.

No, they didn't. See, butchering innocents at the chantry accomplished 2 things. One, it makes Meredith look sympathetic for her crackdowns because his lunancy tars the rest of the mages. Two, it reminds the average people in the street why the mages were locked up to begin with; because they are murderous uncontrollable pieces of human debris. Brilliant strategy.

Der, but it's like a revolution..der.

Yes, when you overthrow something; you have to put something in its place; if the population hates you because you just blew up half the city, you're going to have people revolting against your new Benign Mage Dictatorship.

Der but de mages need to be free der..der Chantry is evil! Der!

Um..yeah. Ever heard of the Tevinter Imperium?

Anders act was unnecessary; he could have achieved the same result by going after Meredith directly; she was the one causing all the friction; even the sane templars would have stood with him..and it still would have caused the same result..except without all the innocent dead people. But hey, why do something smart when you can do something stupid that kills a bunch of innocent people?

In addition, I think Anders doing what he did was out of character; he was a healer, and a soldier, and I think he could have come up with a better way to start his revolution.

Der, revolution! Der!

Yeah, whatever.

Lets just agree to disagree.

Flemeth said change was coming. And thats how I interpreted it. 

[Well]

schalafi wrote...

Some players just love to do one thing in a game... kill. For those players killing Anders, and anyone else that's allowed in the game is the highlight of their day. : (

Some players just dont love terrorist,child killers, and some players just rationalise for Anders and other such scum.It is the highlight of their day.

[Well]

ishmaeltheforsaken wrote...

Maria Caliban wrote...

schalafi wrote...

Some players just love to do one thing in a game... kill. For those players killing Anders, and anyone else that's allowed in the game is the highlight of their day. : (

Yes, I love to kill people who blow up churches in order to incite the mass murder of their own kind so a civil war will break out. I am such a horrible gamer.

You are. Real gamers would blow up the churches themselves.

No they would'nt.You might but that doesnt make you a real gamer.Just another poster with a opinion period. I agree with Maria unless you were playing some evil fanatic then it is something you would do.You dont speak for Real gamers any more that I do.

Modifié par Well, 08 mai 2011 - 07:57 .

[Well]

Brightarrow wrote...

you cant make an omlet with out breaking a few eggs..............
Anders did something drastic to bring drastic change.
If you think about it all revolutions do this. America started with Revolution but we didnt kill the revolutionists when it was over! DONT kill Anders

Could you link where the American patriots blew up a church full of innocents to start the revolution.I must of missed that part in my American history.Darn public schooling.

[HTTP 404]

Brightarrow wrote...

you cant make an omlet with out breaking a few eggs..............
Anders did something drastic to bring drastic change.
If you think about it all revolutions do this. America started with Revolution but we didnt kill the revolutionists when it was over! DONT kill Anders

im sorry but the american revolutionaries didn't kill innocent people in a church...

[LadyVaJedi]

The GrandCleric isn't innocent. By letting the the knight commander mistreat people is wrong and the templers not speaking up and treating the mages like animals is wrong.

[IndigoWolfe]

LadyVaJedi wrote...

The GrandCleric isn't innocent. By letting the the knight commander mistreat people is wrong and the templers not speaking up and treating the mages like animals is wrong.

And the Grand Cleric was the only one in or by the Chantry when it went up?

[LadyVaJedi]

The video clip shows she was in there and a handful of templers.

[HTTP 404]

LadyVaJedi wrote...

The GrandCleric isn't innocent. By letting the the knight commander mistreat people is wrong and the templers not speaking up and treating the mages like animals is wrong.

there was one templar and several clerics shown.  Sad, that you think apathy deserves death.  Your second sentence was never in dispute.  Everyone knows and agrees that the mages were mistreated.  But how does killing people (innocent or not) in cold blood make it right?

[LadyVaJedi]

Same thing could be said about Rev. War here in the states or any war which freedom or Independence are at stake.