184 réponses à ce sujet

[A Scientist being crucified]

Seena wrote...

A Scientist being crucified wrote...

I was just mocking you, my darling. How did you actually manage to criticize sarcasm?

You couldn't have been "mocking" me sweetness - I hadn't entered the discussion yet

And why? Why do you thiink that I was complaining about that? I am actually a sucker for ahem...sexually experienced ladies.[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/tongue.png[/smilie] ----This is a mock. :lol:

Oh, Seena, you are a cynical woman. Cynical and powerful, it drives me mad with desire! (I'm just quoting Zervan)

BTW, did you just call me sweetness?

Modifié par A Scientist being crucified, 10 avril 2011 - 04:06 .

[Sarielle]

A Scientist being crucified wrote...


(BTW, personally I would like to have sex with a virgin, and possibly marry her, but you see how difficult it is? Somehow it has become a dream these days...)

What I find funniest about this is that you say you want sex with a virgin, and to POSSIBLY MARRY HER, while at the same time complaining that girls are too experienced these days. Wouldn't this simply be contributing to your perceived problem?

If you'd simply said "marry a virgin," that would be one thing.

EDIT: Quote fail on my part.

Modifié par Sarielle, 10 avril 2011 - 04:11 .

[Mantaal]

Eeek .. no way. Isabella.. i bet she already had more Fereldeners entering her "gate" then Kirkwall.
She is so busy with that she had not even the time to wear some Pants.

But im sure such "subjects" are attractive for the Younger Players never had a Girlfriend. "boobs! Brain off"

Modifié par Mantaal, 10 avril 2011 - 04:12 .

[Fishy]

In Real life i woul not touch her with a 10 ft pole . .In a video game? Why not ..
I have difficulties with people that consider themself less worthy than dog .. If you're a human being act like one if you want my respect.

Modifié par Suprez30, 10 avril 2011 - 04:25 .

[A Scientist being crucified]

Mantaal wrote...

Eeek .. no way. Isabella.. i bet she already had more Fereldeners entering her "gate" then Kirkwall.
She is so busy with that she had not even the time to wear some Pants.

But im sure such "subjects" are attractive for the Younger Players never had a Girlfriend. "boobs! Brain off"

I bet you had a lot of girlfriends before, or maybe a lot of boyfriends? I'm so very jealous! Because I only had three before.

Suprez30 wrote...

In Real life i woul not touch her with a 10 ft pole . .In a video game? Why not ..
I
have difficulties with people that consider themself less worthy than
dog .. If you're a human being act like one if you want my respect.

Why? I like dogs! Dogs are amazing!! Don't you like them?

Oh, did I tell you that I once had a puppy? Oh, I love her so much.

Modifié par A Scientist being crucified, 10 avril 2011 - 04:42 .

[Seena]

A Scientist being crucified wrote...


Oh, Seena, you are a cynical woman. Cynical and powerful, it drives me mad with desire! (I'm just quoting Zervan)

BTW, did you just call me sweetness?

Cynical and powerful? You have no idea.

And the use of the endearment was simply an answer to your use of "my darling".

[Seena]

Merced652 wrote...

Ok? So essentially your defense of isabela's promiscuity in conjunction with a rather strange opinion of sex without some less experiences can really only lead to one conclusion. Actually two, well 3, but they aren't mutually exclusive. I mean don't take this as me taking a shot at your lifestyle choice or anything. Just sayin'

You must have me confused with an 18 year old girl who actually worries about men's "conclusions"  

[9999dmg]

Upon further reading, this thread is just... sad.

[DoNotIngest]

Suprez30 wrote...

In Real life i woul not touch her with a 10 ft pole . .In a video game? Why not ..
I have difficulties with people that consider themself less worthy than dog .. If you're a human being act like one if you want my respect.

Woah now... Who said anything about being less worthy than a dog? Besides, I think my dog's very worthy. That's why she's so damned fat, she seems like she deserves more food than she really does.

[wowpwnslol]

kenelis wrote...

Seena wrote...

The real question is - do I recall people fretting so much over Zevran's healthy sexual appetites?

Males like this are players. Females like this are <insert s-word>. Aren't double standards grand?

The double standards exist because since the earliest times, the role of the male was to sleep with as many females as possible to have greater chance to extend his generation. It was a basic survival mechanism.

Female's role was completely different. She was meant to give birth and raise children, not bang everything in sight.

That's why the double standards are not really double standards, but a warped way of thinking by our liberated society.

[Seena]

wowpwnslol wrote...

The double standards exist because since the earliest times, the role of the male was to sleep with as many females as possible to have greater chance to extend his generation. It was a basic survival mechanism.

Female's role was completely different. She was meant to give birth and raise children, not bang everything in sight.

That's why the double standards are not really double standards, but a warped way of thinking by our liberated society.

Female's "role"???

You must be joking right?

Role as determined by men, you mean. 

Do you realize that married women who work, have pretty much the same rate of affiars that men do?

Women are no less sexual than men. In fact  since our orgasms don't have the refractory period that men's do (meaning we can have sex over and over and over - whereas you men - can't) - we have the potential to be even more sexual.

Why do you think you spend so much time trying to convince us that our chastity is valuable, while men are very rarely held to the same standard?

Because we like sex as much as you do.

Modifié par Seena, 10 avril 2011 - 05:11 .

[Seena]

Adding to that - why can't men entertain the thought that a woman's "role" (cough cough sputter choke)   was to sleep with as many men as possible to ensure that HER genes were carried on...

I think that thought may just addle their brains...

Modifié par Seena, 10 avril 2011 - 05:21 .

[wowpwnslol]

Seena wrote...


Female's "role"???

You must be joking right?

Role as determined by men, you mean. 

Role determined by nature and physical limitations.

If, those thousands of years ago, we had as many feminists as we do today, human race wouldn't be on this planet. Can you imagine women, hunting, farming etc..? No, it would be a total fiasco. The labor and role was determined by who was most suited for the role - men hunted (or provided food), women looked after home, raised kids in order to allow us to survive.

It's just that today, we have it so easy, that women can take on the "alpha" role by earning more money and having careers and add to the fact that a lot of men have turned from breadwinners into sniveling cowards, unfortunately.

HOWEVER

If the society were to collapse tomorrow and we were forced to live in caves and hunt for food the hard away, do you honestly think the pecking order of today will not change? Of course it will. Males would be the dominant sex again, as the nature created us.

Do you realize that married women who work, have pretty much the same rate of affiars that men do?

Women are no less sexual than men. In fact  since our orgasms don't have the refractory period that men's do (meaning we can have sex over and over and over - whereas you men - can't) - we have the potential to be even more sexual.

Why do you think you spend so much time trying to convince us that our chastity is valuable, while men are very rarely held to the same standard?

Because we like sex as much as you do.

Women are less sexual than men because they only need to have sex a few in order to become pregnant, after that it's meaningless for a year. Male's natural instinct is to impregnate as many female as possible, thus males are more sexual. Males do no suffer from lengthy pregnancy and child birth.

Modifié par wowpwnslol, 10 avril 2011 - 05:23 .

[Seena]

wowpwnslol wrote...

Role determined by nature and physical limitations.

If, those thousands of years ago, we had as many feminists as we do today, human race wouldn't be on this planet. Can you imagine women, hunting, farming etc..

Um - lol actually, if you do any serious anthropological reading - you'll learn that women provided a significant portion of the foodstuffs in hunter/gather society. If not the majority thereof.

? No, it would be a total fiasco. The labor and role was determined by who was most suited for the role - men hunted (or provided food), women looked after home, raised kids in order to allow us to survive.

Refer to my above comment.

It's just that today, we have it so easy, that women can take on the "alpha" role by earning more money and having careers and add to the fact that a lot of men have turned from breadwinners into sniveling cowards, unfortunately.

This comment alone makes the rest of your post - not worth answering.

[LebatomiBeni]

So anyway, about that Isabela...

I like her. <3

[DoNotIngest]

Seems like I'm in the minority of thinking men = people, women = people? Aw. Thought it was the majority.



Edit: Majority among men. I think most women think they're people. I hope...

Modifié par DoNotIngest, 10 avril 2011 - 05:47 .

[Gunso91]

On topic since I don't really care about the debate up there: Why not? Isabela's fun and sexy with a well-hidden heart of gold!.. More or less.. I don't give 2 figs about how many lovers she's had. As for the STD issue then there's Anders. Good 'nuff!

[Tommy6860]

wowpwnslol wrote...



Role determined by nature and physical limitations.

If, those thousands of years ago, we had as many feminists as we do today, human race wouldn't be on this planet. Can you imagine women, hunting, farming etc..? No, it would be a total fiasco. The labor and role was determined by who was most suited for the role - men hunted (or provided food), women looked after home, raised kids in order to allow us to survive.

It's just that today, we have it so easy, that women can take on the "alpha" role by earning more money and having careers and add to the fact that a lot of men have turned from breadwinners into sniveling cowards, unfortunately.

HOWEVER

If the society were to collapse tomorrow and we were forced to live in caves and hunt for food the hard away, do you honestly think the pecking order of today will not change? Of course it will. Males would be the dominant sex again, as the nature created us.


Women are less sexual than men because they only need to have sex a few in order to become pregnant, after that it's meaningless for a year. Male's natural instinct is to impregnate as many female as possible, thus males are more sexual. Males do no suffer from lengthy pregnancy and child birth.

Before you go on making such statements without at least a modicum of knowledge in anthropology, and even moreso, the evolutioanry process, I would not say much more. Having said that, you are following essentially a pseudo-science meme perpetuated by stereotypes of quite a few males that can't drop the dominance ego.

[DoNotIngest]

Hasn't the topic strayed far enough? This is a thread about whether or not you'd take up Isabella on a wild night, not a flame war on male/female evolution and sexual motives.

[learie]

Isabela is fantastic. It appears that a sexually active woman is as controversial to some people as homosexuality. I am hoping it is a phenomen confined to conservative citizens of the USA. PLEASE, TELL ME THAT"S TRUE.

Wowpwnslol: and you know all this because you were there? We have records of their social structures and daily life? There's a group of people who have been observed living that way?
No?
Did you know that the InterNet is a weapon of the feminist conspiracy? It's probably your duty to stop using it in protest. Really. The Spearhead is going p'n'p as we speak.

OP: does your mum know you are using the computer? I don't think she's going to be too happy with you if she reads your posts. I imagine she aims for you to be a decent human being when you grow up, as well as being able to construct sentences that make sense. "How did you actually manage to criticize sarcasm?" translates as "Explain to me the method using which you successfully identified the negative implications of my ironically worded and bitter remark".
Please pay more attention in your English grammar classes.

DoNotIngnest: if it was a thread about how much you fancy Isabela, there wouldn't be any evo psych misogyny in it.

Modifié par learie, 10 avril 2011 - 07:43 .

[A Scientist being crucified]

Tommy6860 wrote...

wowpwnslol wrote...



Role determined by nature and physical limitations.

If, those thousands of years ago, we had as many feminists as we do today, human race wouldn't be on this planet. Can you imagine women, hunting, farming etc..? No, it would be a total fiasco. The labor and role was determined by who was most suited for the role - men hunted (or provided food), women looked after home, raised kids in order to allow us to survive.

It's just that today, we have it so easy, that women can take on the "alpha" role by earning more money and having careers and add to the fact that a lot of men have turned from breadwinners into sniveling cowards, unfortunately.

HOWEVER

If the society were to collapse tomorrow and we were forced to live in caves and hunt for food the hard away, do you honestly think the pecking order of today will not change? Of course it will. Males would be the dominant sex again, as the nature created us.


Women are less sexual than men because they only need to have sex a few in order to become pregnant, after that it's meaningless for a year. Male's natural instinct is to impregnate as many female as possible, thus males are more sexual. Males do no suffer from lengthy pregnancy and child birth.

Before you go on making such statements without at least a modicum of knowledge in anthropology, and even moreso, the evolutioanry process, I would not say much more. Having said that, you are following essentially a pseudo-science meme perpetuated by stereotypes of quite a few males that can't drop the dominance ego.

Seena wrote...

wowpwnslol wrote...

Role determined by nature and physical limitations.

If,
those thousands of years ago, we had as many feminists as we do today,
human race wouldn't be on this planet. Can you imagine women, hunting,
farming etc..

Um - lol actually, if you do any
serious anthropological reading - you'll learn that women provided a
significant portion of the foodstuffs in hunter/gather society. If not
the majority thereof.

I mean...what? You guys tell this guy to read more about Anthropology? I studied anthropology in university before, and I think he's exactly talking about anthropology. So who is the one who doesn't know anything about anthropology?:happy:

[A Scientist being crucified]

Seena wrote...

A Scientist being crucified wrote...


Oh, Seena, you are a cynical woman. Cynical and powerful, it drives me mad with desire! (I'm just quoting Zervan)

BTW, did you just call me sweetness?

Cynical and powerful? You have no idea.

And the use of the endearment was simply an answer to your use of "my darling".

Is that a YES?:happy:

[A Scientist being crucified]

learie wrote...

Isabela is fantastic. It appears that a sexually active woman is as controversial to some people as homosexuality. I am hoping it is a phenomen confined to conservative citizens of the USA. PLEASE, TELL ME THAT"S TRUE.

Wowpwnslol: and you know all this because you were there? We have records of their social structures and daily life? There's a group of people who have been observed living that way?
No?
Did you know that the InterNet is a weapon of the feminist conspiracy? It's probably your duty to stop using it in protest. Really. The Spearhead is going p'n'p as we speak.

OP: does your mum know you are using the computer? I don't think she's going to be too happy with you if she reads your posts. I imagine she aims for you to be a decent human being when you grow up, as well as being able to construct sentences that make sense. "How did you actually manage to criticize sarcasm?" translates as "Explain to me the method using which you successfully identified the negative implications of my ironically worded and bitter remark".
Please pay more attention in your English grammar classes.

DoNotIngnest: if it was a thread about how much you fancy Isabela, there wouldn't be any evo psych misogyny in it.

Well...I'm an American, and I think conservatism has nothing to do with this.

My English? Are you serious? Do you have to make personal attack to make your own point? Why are some people just incapable of a single rational conversation?

As for my mom, you don't wanna know her.....:happy:

[Apirka]

learie wrote...

Isabela is fantastic.

On topic: No, never. I don't want my Hawke to have STDs.