LordJeyl wrote...
Alright, I'll do it. Just one thing though. I'm going to take your question and add one unrealistic element to it in order to better demonstrate the point I'm trying to make. Let's say that the Reapers did go to one of the many other home worlds in the galaxy instead of Earth. When the Reapers get their, they destroy their planet and in doing so somehow causes that said species to become extinct. Gone. Even the colonies and immigrants on other worlds somehow heard news of their home world's destruction and they all die out due to broken hearts, or whatever.
So here's the risk. The Reapers have invaded and destroyed the Assari home world, thus causing the Assari to become extinct. No more Assari in any future Mass Effect story. Period. When I see it that way, it doesn't become a just a race to save the galaxy, but a race to save a whole entire species that are a part of the Mass Effect universe. I's these races, not humans, that make the Mass Effect universe unique, fun and different from all the other scifi universes that are out there. If you lose them and still have the humans, the story wouldn't be that interesting. Familiarity, while certainly something you can get more attached to, is also prone to be more generic, predictable and boring, because it's something you expect.
Now, if Earth was to be destroyed and all the humans went extinct, the Mass Effect universe would still have it's other races. I don't see that as much of a bad thing because humans pretty much already make up 99% of all scifi stories in existence. If having no humans bothered me, I could always watch Star Trek, Star Wars, Battlestar Galactica or play Halo, Duke Nukem, Command and Conquer, ect. Humans are every where in science fiction. The races in Mass Effect on the other hand only inhabit this one universe. When they're gone, they're gone. That is why I'm not excited about the prospect of saving Earth. It's a story that's been done a million times over, and I've grown to know and like these other races enough to care about them more than just that one planet I've seen be saved again and again.
If the Asari homeworld was attacked, the Council will take immediate action, especially the Asari Council members. Same is true if the Turians, Hanar, Salarians, Volus, Elcor homeworlds. Earth is relatively new to the galactic community and is seen as an aggressive race. It would be harder for Shepard, who is human, to get galactic support to help humans than is to get galactic support to help the Asari. The dramatic conflict in the human narrartive is stronger. There is less conflict or tension in the Asari narrative because you'd know exactly what the council will do.
So far, all renegade Shepard's decions favors human dominance, while paragon Shepard favors intergalactic diversity. ME3's outcome will largely depend on your previous choices. Judging by what we have so far, a renegade Shepard will have a stronger human race at his side (Cerberus, human Council members, Collector Base tech) at the cost of a weaker intergalactic support (killed Rachni, resentment of humans), while a paragon will have a weaker human race but more intergalactic allies to get help from. If ME3's main story arc was to save the Asari, Shepard's previous paragon/renegade decisions matters less because it's about the Asari. If you asked another race to help the Asari, does it really matter to them if you were a human supremecist or an alien lover? It doesn't matter because it's the Asari, not humans.
In short, Shepard needs to do more work if the humans were attacked. More dramatic tension, more storylines, more twists, betrayals, friendship, animosity, persuasion, imtimidation.