Zjarcal wrote...
thurmanator692 wrote...
I take it you're a Merrill fan?
I wonder if that big siggie gave it away...
I am kind of sad that Leli only shows up once in the sig
Zjarcal wrote...
thurmanator692 wrote...
I take it you're a Merrill fan?
I wonder if that big siggie gave it away...
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
thurmanator692 wrote...
I take it you're a Merrill fan?
I wonder if that big siggie gave it away...
I am kind of sad that Leli only shows up once in the sig
Modifié par Zjarcal, 11 avril 2011 - 01:02 .
Modifié par Suron, 11 avril 2011 - 01:01 .
Zjarcal wrote...
Oh... I was lazy and didn't wanted to make a new one equal in size. But my love for them both is equal.. <3
Guest_thurmanator692_*
I was about to be a smartass and say isabela, but i'm not in the mood lolZjarcal wrote...
thurmanator692 wrote...
I take it you're a Merrill fan?
I wonder if that big siggie gave it away...
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
So a foursome is possible?
And no, I don't know how this question logically follows up from your post.
thurmanator692 wrote...
I was about to be a smartass and say isabela, but i'm not in the mood lol
Modifié par Zjarcal, 11 avril 2011 - 01:09 .
Guest_thurmanator692_*
Well, she doesn't want to miss the dirty stuff....Zjarcal wrote...
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
So a foursome is possible?
And no, I don't know how this question logically follows up from your post.
ROFL!!
There's no need for logic when foursomes are involved.
Well, Dana and Ciera would certainly push for it, while Leli would more than likely agree, but I'm not sure about Merrill... we'd probably have to explain her what a foursome is and then she'd get all embarrassed....
Zjarcal wrote...
ROFL!!
There's no need for logic when foursomes are involved.
Well, Dana and Ciera would certainly push for it, while Leli would more than likely agree, but I'm not sure about Merrill... we'd probably have to explain her what a foursome is and then she'd get all embarrassed....
errant_knight wrote...
I don't hate Hawke, I just don't like my player character to be as far out on my control as that. It felt like Hawke was an amusing and likable NPC (unlike most of the real npcs), but that's not what I look for in a player character. I want to create my PC, not have him/her handed to me on a platter. But hate? No. I felt pretty damn sorry for the poor bastard by the end.
thurmanator692 wrote...
Well, she doesn't want to miss the dirty stuff....
KnightofPhoenix wrote...You can tell that that it would make her cool and popular in the human world.
Or that it's impolite and insulting to refuse in human culture
Modifié par Zjarcal, 11 avril 2011 - 01:25 .
The Angry One wrote...
I blame Varric.
Zjarcal wrote...
Yeah, I think exploiting her innocence and naiveness might be pretty useful here... "Tis typical for friends to do this. Otherwise they'll consider us dull and won't want to hang out with us anymore..."
Oh, what horrible people we are exploiting the poor girl.
Ahem, I'm done hogging the thread with my naughty posts.
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
I blame Varric.
He's a horrible story teller if he can't imagine different caves and estates, and keeps on boring us with redundant wave after wave combat.
Thankfully his chest hair makes up for it. Probably the only reason Cassandra was not bored.
The Angry One wrote...
That would explain her constant glaring.

Morroian wrote...
Good points, Hawke is his/her own person making his/her way in the world, not part of any organisation/institution, which IMHO is actually why Hawke doesn't have choices in directing the plot. The Warden had the power of the Grey Warden's behind him, Hawke doesn't have that because he/she remains independent. Yet Hawke gets what he/she has because he is still a powerful character.
Why is he a moron? He's not part of the power structure so he's in no position to actually give the orders that would defuse the situation. There are moments in Act 3 where he tries to play peacemaker where he tries to prompt Elthina to do something, anything.Suron wrote...
because he's a tool.
At least in Origins you could actually CAUSE things to happen or not happen within confines of the story (yes you still had to rally against Loghain and yes you still had to kill the Archdemon)...however Hawke..is just a reactionary moron.
Zjarcal wrote...
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
So a foursome is possible?
And no, I don't know how this question logically follows up from your post.
ROFL!!
There's no need for logic when foursomes are involved.
Modifié par TheBlackBaron, 11 avril 2011 - 01:35 .
Morroian wrote...
Why is he a moron? He's not part of the power structure so he's in no position to actually give the orders that would defuse the situation. There are moments in Act 3 where he tries to play peacemaker where he tries to prompt Elthina to do something, anything.
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 11 avril 2011 - 01:37 .
Modifié par axl99, 11 avril 2011 - 01:48 .
Speaking of friends... Isabela would find out about it someday and probably break down into tears for not being a part of it...Zjarcal wrote...
Ciera: "Tis typical for friends to do this. Otherwise they'll consider us dull and won't want to hang out with us anymore..."
He could support the nobles who were plotting against Meredith in Act 3, nothing came of that beyond a few fights because the writers didn't pursue it. There were moments when Hawke could explore becoming Viscount but got shot down in flames because he explicitly needed the support of the templars. He tried to prompt Elthina into acting, tried personally to play peacemaker between Meredith and Orsino.KnightofPhoenix wrote...
There was a lot Hawke could have done to apply pressure on Meredith, or even support her, without needing to be part of the official power structure (Technically Meredith is not part of Kirkwall's either). He doesn't have to be succesful, but at least make him active.