204 réponses à ce sujet

[Eber]

DocDoomII wrote...

so is it possible to convince her even if present on the scene?

Convince her not to engage in fighting yes (if hardened and you have enough intimidation). Convince her defiling the ashes is the right thing to do, no.

Modifié par Eber, 13 avril 2011 - 10:39 .

[Sabariel]

TBH the only real rival I felt my Hawke had was Carver. Everyone else was like: "Well, I hate you and/or everything you stand for, but I'll still be your friend/lovebug/comrade in arms anyway."

Modifié par Sabariel, 13 avril 2011 - 10:42 .

[Monica83]

this system make feel the game not like you have a companions but most you have a brainless puppets thats follow you

[DocDoomII]

Sabariel wrote...

TBH the only real rival I felt my Hawke had was Carver. Everyone else was like: "Well, I hate you and/or everything you stand for, but I'll still be your friend/lovebug/comrade in arms anyway."

But that it's actually normal.
It's your brother after all, you are still his family.

For other people to stick with you no matter what I can only show my toughts with a picture

[Monica83]

I loved the way i interacted with companions in baldur's gate 2 i like also my companion have their opinions and thinking on things.. I love see someone that disapproves my choice and leave the party of betray me.. This is all part of the roleplay.... The rival system is bad implemented and just illogic... If i hate mages i can't have in the party someone that don't hates mages its illogical if that character continue to stay with me when i kill all the mage on my sight... Its like you love dogs and im a dog killer..You continue to travel with me and see me kill al dog in the city? This have no sense... Its just ridicolus now continue to climbing the glass and see its awesome.. But this system is born only for a single thing.. Gameplay...THis is not a feature... Like the fact all characters in DA2 are bisexual (in RL im bisexual too).. Its simple unrealistic