I admit, it kinda came out of nowhere. But I think it offered a far more interesting choice than the final quest, one that the game never truly explored: do we support the fundamentalist approach taken by Meredith, or do we support the conspiracy's (never really fleshed out, but for the sake of this argument let's just say more liberal) stance? Keep in mind that the conspiracy consisted of both Templars and Mages.
Perhaps this is what could have happened:
The Conspiracy starts a movement demanding greater freedoms for Mages (Anders's stance). Maybe the mages are allowed to live with their families, maybe they get a tavern or two to get drunk in. The downside is rather than shunning Blood Magic, they believe it can be used as a tool to be studied and used (Merril's stance). The Templars who go along with the plan are mage sympathizers like Thrask, or who simply believe that it's better to support the mages rather than letting them explode themselves unsupervised.
On the other hand, you have Meredith. She believes that blood magic is evil, and actively purges any mage suspected of using it. On the downside, the rest of the mages have really ****ty lives. Supporting her would be the general populace and people like Fenris, who fear that giving mages more power would lead to another Tevinter Imperium.
Obviously, this approach would have required some serious re-writing of the last act. But I do think that it would have presented the player with a proper moral choice, as opposed to the whole CRAZY LADY v FLESHY UNDEAD HEAP affair the game throws at you after it jumps off the slippery slope.
Thoughts?
Modifié par Gongsun Zan, 14 avril 2011 - 01:13 .





Retour en haut






