ME3 PC requirements
#76
Posté 10 septembre 2011 - 01:48
#77
Posté 13 septembre 2011 - 11:50
Wrong. The average PC today has a worse video component compared to what games require than back almost six years ago when the current console generation was all new, and desktops were dominant. These days, the average PC is a laptop with only an onboard chipset video chip in it.onelifecrisis wrote...
It's an Xbox game. If your PC is less than a thousand years old it'll run it.
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 13 septembre 2011 - 11:50 .
#78
Posté 13 septembre 2011 - 12:55
Gorath Alpha wrote...
Wrong. The average PC today has a worse video component compared to what games require than back almost six years ago when the current console generation was all new, and desktops were dominant. These days, the average PC is a laptop with only an onboard chipset video chip in it.onelifecrisis wrote...
It's an Xbox game. If your PC is less than a thousand years old it'll run it.
The average PC today isn't made for gaming...
But anyone who knows what they are doing when building a PC or purchasing one in terms of gfx card specs should be able to run ME 1,2, and 3 with relatively easy (I mean the first two run fine (not "great") on ATI 4650's/5650's...I doubt just based on the general specifications it will be much different for ME3
#79
Posté 13 septembre 2011 - 01:19
Kronner wrote...
It has to run on consoles, man. Below average PC will be more than good enough to run it.
BioWare don't make their PC games console ports. The PC spec will be higher than the console spec.
Modifié par Jakedee010v2, 13 septembre 2011 - 01:20 .
#80
Posté 13 septembre 2011 - 05:25
We'll have to wait and see, I think.N0-Future wrote...
I think its supposed to have similar system reqs as ME2
#81
Posté 24 septembre 2011 - 11:22
http://social.biowar...79247/2#8387968
#82
Posté 25 septembre 2011 - 01:10
Ghost Warrior wrote...
That worries me.Will I be able to play ME3 on that resolution,or will I have to turn it down,and how much?
You're looking at going down to 640x400 with about as much clarity as a blind man.
#83
Posté 25 septembre 2011 - 01:12
Gorath Alpha wrote...
Let's keep all this type discussion here in this one thread, and not start new ones or dig up different old dupes of the subject matter, shall we?
There's a current thread running comparing console predictions for PC predictions that has begun to cross over into PC Hardware recommendations, which rightly belongs here in this older thread.
http://social.biowar...79247/2#8387968
Someones trying for mod
#84
Posté 25 septembre 2011 - 05:14
#85
Posté 25 septembre 2011 - 05:25
I can't imagine ME 3 will be any sort of astronomical jump in graphics requirements. In fact, I'm pretty sure I could run it on the laptop with little to no problem if I really wanted to.
Modifié par Soul Cool, 25 septembre 2011 - 05:25 .
#86
Posté 25 septembre 2011 - 03:08
#87
Posté 25 septembre 2011 - 04:34
#88
Posté 25 septembre 2011 - 05:35
#89
Posté 30 septembre 2011 - 09:10
quad core 2.2 GHz processor
8 GB of RAM
1 GB of graphics with a 738 MHz processor
and lots of Hard Drive space
Windows 7 gives my computer a performance rating of 5.9. the hard drive data transfer speed takes the rating down a bit
#90
Posté 01 octobre 2011 - 03:20
#91
Posté 02 octobre 2011 - 06:55
We already have one ME 3 System Requirements thread, this one. Another isn't needed.Ylhaym wrote...
batman22 wrote...
I have
been going though defferent desktops trying to find one that can play
this game on max settings and i finally found one in my price range, so
will this desktop run the game on max settings?????
Yes, its more than enough...
( http://social.biowar...3/index/8428780 )
#92
Posté 02 octobre 2011 - 07:37
So i use my older monitor now after playing on a 32" lcd, which is 15" 1024x768 which is fine for me and the limitedness of my pc, i use a E6500 with 4gb and a 5670 512mb, which runs everything high atleast in the present time which will hold me out until i can upgrade, how would this run me3 you think ? (Considering the 1024x768 resolution, and the witcher 2 running at 20-40fps on ultra, no ubersampling)
#93
Posté 28 octobre 2011 - 02:47
MartinDN wrote...
At the resolution I play at and don't plan to upgrade to a higher one unless Im working and can afford a new pc, Im...sort of confident of running me3. But opinions on it are always welcome.
It seems that there are constant DUPES because no one wants to believe that they weren't the first person in the world to think of a particular question.
http://social.biowar...95136/1#8596434
#94
Posté 28 octobre 2011 - 05:22
The amount of VRAM attached to a video graphics card is totally meaningless with regard to gaming performance. The single, ONLY relationship it carries forward is final screen resolution choice.My guess would be the minumum requirements are:
Pentium Core 2 duo (or equivalent)
1gb of Ram DDR2 or DDR3
at least 500mb graphics card.
- hard drive space obviously.
My pc specifications are:
Pentium i5 3.1hgz
8gb DDR3 RAM
1.5gb nvidia graphics card with 800mb nvidia dual graphics card performing PhysX.
-hard drve obviously.
On this spec I can achieve max graphics with flawless performance. I forsee ME3 being the same.
GPU Core Speed, GPU RAM Speed, GPU Memory System Bandwidth, and Count of Shader Processor are the aspects of graphics card specifications that have meaning when comparing performance.
As anyone can see from this page at Newegg, there are tens of thousands of total garbage versions of cards out there with 512 MBs and upward that are useless for games:
www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx
P. S. I did a different search at Newegg, for cards with a full GB of VRAM, and there were seven G 210s and seven Geforce 8400 GSes on the top page, along with six Radeon HD 5450 cards. None of those first 14 will "run" ME1, or ME2, and when we compare their very slow speed, I'd say that a 210 is CRAWLING on its belly, an 8400 is down on its hands and knees, while the HD 5450 is on crutches. None will perform really well in the first two of these games, and I guarantee they'll not suddenly get better in ME3.
www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx
Gorath
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 30 octobre 2011 - 05:06 .
#95
Posté 03 novembre 2011 - 08:11
I wonder how I missed this. Four years ago, a Mobility Radeon HD 3670 was, indeed, a gaming card. The business version that year was the HD 3450:Soul Cool wrote...
Well, I can play ME 2 on a Radeon HD 3670 (On my laptop which is definitely not designed for gaming [can provide further specs if needed, but you get the idea I hope], desktop is much better.), which, all things considered, is a pretty (Make that very.) terrible graphics card by today's standard.
I can't imagine ME 3 will be any sort of astronomical jump in graphics requirements. In fact, I'm pretty sure I could run it on the laptop with little to no problem if I really wanted to.![]()
www.gpureview.com/show_cards.php
Those are the desktop versions. The desktop HD 3650 was quite a ways above the Radeon X1600, and should be still within close range of the expected ME-3 Minimum pass/nopass zone.
#96
Posté 03 novembre 2011 - 08:58
#97
Posté 03 novembre 2011 - 09:41
You mean on the Windows Experience Index? That rating doesn't mean anything.Anihilus wrote...
My computer is rated as a 5.1, so I think I should be good.
#98
Posté 03 novembre 2011 - 09:42
Fredvdp wrote...
You mean on the Windows Experience Index? That rating doesn't mean anything.Anihilus wrote...
My computer is rated as a 5.1, so I think I should be good.
Hehehehe
#99
Posté 03 novembre 2011 - 10:04
#100
Posté 03 novembre 2011 - 10:32
Modifié par DiebytheSword, 03 novembre 2011 - 10:32 .





Retour en haut







