189 réponses à ce sujet

[Amaterasuomikami]

I can heartily recommend a GTX 460 1GB VRAM as well.

[Spartanburger]

For me, a Radeon 5770 (Gigabyte SOC version) will run ME1 and ME2 (1920x1080) at around 35/60/55 (min/max/avg).

Honestly though, as long as the game is being primarily developed for this console generation, as long as you can run ME1 or ME2 then you will most definitely be able to run ME3.

My laptop's A6-3400m runs ME1 and ME2 fine at 1280x720 too.

[Anihilus]

Ok then, my video card is a HD5450. Am I good to go?

[alex90c]

Amaterasuomikami wrote...

I can heartily recommend a GTX 460 1GB VRAM as well.

Better off getting a GTX 560.

[Spartanburger]

Anihilus wrote...

Ok then, my video card is a HD5450. Am I good to go?

You'll run it.

It just depends on how well it is run.


I ran ME2 on a HD 4350 at min settings (the only thing that really did anything was the lighting) 1280x720 and got an average of 35 fps.
The 4350 is specifically mentioned as being below the minimum requirements, yet it still ran it.


I have no doubt that a HD 5450 wil run it. Just don't expect it to be running at 1080p.

Edit: Turn AF off and it should run fine at around 9and a little above) 1280x720

Modifié par Spartanburger, 03 novembre 2011 - 11:15 .

[Anihilus]

I can run ME2 at near-max.

[packardbell]

Anihilus wrote...

I can run ME2 at near-max.

Chances are you'll do the same with ME3. Considering it's the same engine, I doubt requirements would go up leaps and bounds.

[Spartanburger]

Anihilus wrote...

I can run ME2 at near-max.

Do you know the resolution?

I would assume that if you can run ME2 at near-max, then you should be able to run ME3 at medium at the same resolution, or at the same settings with a slight fps drop.



honestly, I don't expect the FPS drop to be much greater than 1 or 2 fps from ME2 to ME3. If anything, it may end up being an improvement due to shading and engine improvements.

[Anihilus]

I don't really care about the resolution in terms of FPS. I usually run ME2 1280x720 because I find it easy to look at. Although i did try it for a brief time at 1920x1080 and switched back due to a noticable FPS drop. Anything in between those two just didn't look right to me.

[Gorath Alpha]

Anihilus wrote...

Ok then, my video card is a HD5450.

I can run ME2 at near-max.

Am I good to go?

I consider that claim to be a HUGE exaggeration, unless the screen resolution is 1024 by 768. An HD 5450 just isn't very good at all.

Meanwhile, by the time ME-3 is released, the mid-level AMD APUs will be available.

www.guru3d.com/news/new-amd-trinity-apu-specs-leak/

I hope we'll start seeing some pre-release indications about how well the "Trinity" family of unified 'Dozer CPUs with graphics will be running.

P. S.  Anyone preferring a purpose-made local thread along the lines of "Can I run It", without the SR Lab's terrible web site ignorance is welcome to use this one: 

Can my PC run this game? (ME2 / ME3)

social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/106/index/7484236

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 10 décembre 2011 - 06:31 .

[Sebbe1337o]

I'm glad they're aiming for the same specs as for ME2, which was very optimized for a game that looked that good. Took a lot of HDD space, but that's never a concern really. I'm personally not concerned, since I bought a very good rig a year back. never under 60fps at all times on 1080p.

It's extra nice since many games coming now (Skyrim, BF3, etc) seems to have a lot higher reqs than games from earlier this year. Seems like reqs will increase exponentially from some developers from now on. Then it's good that hardware performance doubles every 18 months with new products etc, for gamers who are willing to upgrade that often at least. That increases so much faster than perf. reqs for most games, so thankfully you don't have to pay very much for a computer that will be able to handle all games until you have to buy a new one maybe 5 years later.

[Gabey5]

same as me 2 give or take

[Sebbe1337o]

Gorath Alpha wrote...

Anihilus wrote...

Ok then, my video card is a HD5450.

I can run ME2 at near-max.

Am I good to go?

I consider that claim to be a massive exaggeration, unless the screen resolution is 1024 by 768. An HD 5450 just isn't very good at all.

Meanwhile, by the time ME-3 is released, the mid-level AMD APUs will be available.

www.guru3d.com/news/new-amd-trinity-apu-specs-leak/

I hope we'll start seeing some pre-release indications about how well the "Trinity" family of unified 'Dozer CPUs with graphics will be running.

P. S.  Anyone preferring a purpose-made local thread along the lines of "Can I run It", without the SR Lab's terrible web site's ignorance is welcome to use this one: 

Can my PC run this game? (ME2 / ME3)

social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/106/index/7484236

Sadly, the Bulldozer didn't perform nearly as well as predicted. I haven't heard much since the first news about that, hope they fix it, since it could save AMD. I like them

[Hathur]

TheDaniellasaur wrote...

Kronner wrote...

It has to run on consoles, man. Below average PC will be more than good enough to run it.

I have an average computer and i cant run it so i dont think thats right.

By "average computer" people mean an average GAMING computer... not some piece of tash ordered from Dell that comes with onboard video, garbage motherboard, slow RAM, etc.

I can run ME2 on an intel Core 2 duo 2.0ghz, 2gigs RAM @ 800mhz, ATI 3850HD, Asus p5k-75e motherboard.... very medium / low end gaming system that cost me about $700 dollars when I built it myself a few years back... Me2 runs at 60fps flawlessly on that very very modest computer.

I have a much newer, faster computer now and ME2 doesn't run any smoother on my new rig than my old.

Again, that's for a proper "average" gaming rig... not a computer that was designed for web browsing and word processing.

Modifié par Hathur, 09 novembre 2011 - 07:41 .

[Sebbe1337o]

TheDaniellasaur wrote...

Kronner wrote...

It has to run on consoles, man. Below average PC will be more than good enough to run it.

I have an average computer and i cant run it so i dont think thats right.

Or you might be over estimating your hardware perhaps? :innocent:

Hathur wrote...

TheDaniellasaur wrote...

Kronner wrote...

It has to run on consoles, man. Below average PC will be more than good enough to run it.

I have an average computer and i cant run it so i dont think thats right.

By
"average computer" people mean an average GAMING computer... not some
piece of tash ordered from Dell that comes with onboard video, garbage
motherboard, slow RAM, etc.

I can run ME2 on an intel Core 2 duo
2.0ghz, 2gigs RAM @ 800mhz, ATI 3850HD, p5k-75e motherboard.... very
medium / low end gaming system that cost me about $700 dollars when I
built it myself a few years back... Me2 runs at 60fps flawlessly on that
very very modest computer.

I have a much newer, faster computer now and ME2 doesn't run any smoother on my new rig than my old.

Again, that's for a proper "average" gaming rig... not a computer that was designed for web browsing and word processing.

This was a lot better answer than mine, haha!

Modifié par Sebbe1337o, 09 novembre 2011 - 06:25 .

[lastpatriot]

From my understanding, you will need the following to make ME:3 work on the highest settings:

[SirBoomstick]

I ran ME 2 on full settings, 1600x1060, with an HD4850, 4GB of ram and a Core 2 Quad. I can't wait to try it again with my practically new rig: GTX560Ti, 8GB of ram and an i7 2600K. I think I'm gonna have a great time.

[Gorath Alpha]

For some reason, I was feeling unhappy with the start date for the Social Forum as my own start date here; I had a recent Bioware account from mid-2009, my last one on the "Legacy" forums, although at least two prior accounts fell by the wayside since 2002, when I would be inactive too long and then couldn't use the "forgot the password" option to get going again.

Getting back on topic, after that bit of history

As stated before, even though the Unreal Tournament base is Dx9 and Xbox 360, ME-2 hadn't managed to exploit the full range of what the console graphics can offer. There is / was still some headroom left (not much, I know).

Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 10 décembre 2011 - 06:50 .

[Fredvdp]

Sebbe1337o wrote...

It's extra nice since many games coming now (Skyrim, BF3, etc) seems to have a lot higher reqs than games from earlier this year.

The Skyrim requirements are pretty low actually.

[Gorath Alpha]

Fredvdp wrote...

Sebbe1337o wrote...

It's extra nice since many games coming now (Skyrim, BF3, etc) seems to have a lot higher reqs than games from earlier this year.

The Skyrim requirements are pretty low actually.

As has become a tradition for Bethesda games, the official requirements are crap again.  The CPU naming is nonsense, and the minimum graphics is nonsense. 

[marstor05]

you dont need a graphical powerhouse to run the game.

hehe installed my XFX HD6870 now so i'm ready to go kick reaper sushi botski.

[Sebbe1337o]

Gorath Alpha wrote...

Fredvdp wrote...

Sebbe1337o wrote...

It's extra nice since many games coming now (Skyrim, BF3, etc) seems to have a lot higher reqs than games from earlier this year.

The Skyrim requirements are pretty low actually.

As has become a tradition for Bethesda games, the official requirements are crap again.  The CPU naming is nonsense, and the minimum graphics is nonsense. 

lol, saw that just now. The reqs was A LOT higher a month ago or so.

[Fredvdp]

Gorath Alpha wrote...

Fredvdp wrote...

Sebbe1337o wrote...

It's extra nice since many games coming now (Skyrim, BF3, etc) seems to have a lot higher reqs than games from earlier this year.

The Skyrim requirements are pretty low actually.

As has become a tradition for Bethesda games, the official requirements are crap again.  The CPU naming is nonsense, and the minimum graphics is nonsense. 

I just explained that on another forum where some guy said that according to SRL his Geforce 9200M GS can run it. If they make a mod like Oldblivion, then perhaps.

Sebbe1337o wrote...

lol, saw that just now. The reqs was A LOT higher a month ago or so.

I've seen the same unofficial requirements quoted very often as if they were official.

Modifié par Fredvdp, 09 novembre 2011 - 10:10 .

[Trinity66]

EDIT: nevermind ..

Modifié par Trinity66, 09 novembre 2011 - 10:19 .