The thread you responded to wasn't actually about the requirements, but rather, about the inherent limitations on graphics in today's console-oriented game environment (pretty close, yes).PnXMarcin1PL wrote...
I have an old quad oc'd to 3ghz and GTX 460 1 GB and suprisingly BF3 is very playable on ultra. I'm not worried about Mass effect 3 system requirements
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 21 novembre 2011 - 10:33 .
Gorath Alpha wrote...
Actually, as stated before, even
though the Unreal Tournament base is Dx9 and Xbox 360, ME-2 hadn't
managed to exploit the full range of what the console graphics can
offer. There is / was still some headroom left (not too much, I know).
That other thread with a similar type discussion, that Marcin replied to, wandered afield from ME-3 into generalities and ended up being locked.PnXMarcin1PL wrote...
I have an old quad oc'd to 3ghz and GTX 460 1 GB and suprisingly BF3 is very playable on ultra. I'm not worried about Mass effect 3 system requirements
Stephen1981 wrote...
yea my PC ran ME1 and ME2 np gonna assume i can run ME3 no issues
Random Nobody wrote...
So ME is still on U3, eh?
someone else wrote...
MINIMUM requirements are unlocked i7. topline asus or gigabyte mobo, 16 gigs PC3 14900, triple 580s, 7.1 surround system, and three-screen 27" hd array. (and if you tell my wife otherwise, you're a deadman.)
my sincere respects Sir.
Unreal Engine so yes. Although there's not much difference in performance in ME2, only ME1. I played ME2 on a 2ghz single core, then switched to a 3ghz quad and it was just about the same performance I was getting.alex90c wrote...
Do the ME games actually use multiple cores by any chance?
Modifié par BounceDK, 26 novembre 2011 - 02:19 .
Developers almost never offer specifics this far ahead of the release date (references to it will stay fairly general until the game is within 10 days to two weeks of going gold, usually).DarkHayama wrote...
I was looking through the site for the required specs of Mass Effect 3, and can't seem to find any? Has Bioware released anything official and I just can't find it, or am I left guessing? I mean, I'd like to know if I can play the game before I go preordering it. It would be kind of wasteful to buy a game I can't even play, after all.
If I have just missed an official word on required specs, please just link me or something. It would be much appreciated.
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 08 décembre 2011 - 02:04 .
It was never necessary for AMD to beat Intel at the absolute pinnacle of top end performance, since that is so far beyond what anything on the order of ME-3 will ever need. The APUs have graphics that destroy the Sandy Bridge graphics for a much smaller cost to the user. Combine a usable set of cores with a Mainline level of graphical gaming ability and sell it for a lot less than the cost of Sandy Bridge, and the gaming field will be revolutionized.Sebbe1337o wrote...
Sadly, the Bulldozer didn't perform nearly as well as predicted. I haven't heard much since the first news about that, hope they fix it, since it could save AMD. I like them
Personally, I am HOPING to see better utilization of the possibilities still unexpended in Dx9 graphics, while ready for almost no improvement worthy of that definition. I anticipate modest steps in some areas, while as usual leaving the Garrus' face texture-type failures on something new.DominusVita wrote...
I expect the graphics to be significantly better quality, more polished than the first 2. They won't be pulling a halo 3
Audio will be top notch as usual. The writing will still have its quirks like the previous 2, but still improved.
.
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 10 décembre 2011 - 06:39 .
Gorath Alpha wrote...
Personally, I am HOPING to see better utilization of the possibilities still unexpended in Dx9 graphics, while ready for almost no improvement worthy of that definition. I anticipate modest steps in some areas, while as usual leaving the Garrus' face texture-type failures on something new.DominusVita wrote...
I expect the graphics to be significantly better quality, more polished than the first 2. They won't be pulling a halo 3
Audio will be top notch as usual. The writing will still have its quirks like the previous 2, but still improved.
.
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 10 décembre 2011 - 03:06 .
Witcher 2 uses the Red Engine. I believe it's the first game to use that engine.Gorath Alpha wrote...
Were you aware that The Witcher and Witcher 2 are both using the Bioware Game engine from NWN, updated to Dx9 differently than Obsidian did with NWN2?
Modifié par Fredvdp, 09 décembre 2011 - 01:49 .
Modifié par Gorath Alpha, 10 décembre 2011 - 08:32 .
Modifié par Talosred, 10 décembre 2011 - 07:55 .
Fredvdp wrote...
Witcher 2 uses the Red Engine. I believe it's the first game to use that engine.Gorath Alpha wrote...
Were you aware that The Witcher and Witcher 2 are both using the Bioware Game engine from NWN, updated to Dx9 differently than Obsidian did with NWN2?
www.youtube.com/watch
Modifié par Talosred, 10 décembre 2011 - 07:53 .
Only if Deus Ex HR uses the UT3 game engine. Does it do so? I don't know; it's not on my own play list.Talosred wrote...
I am still going by if I can run Dues Ex HR very well mass effect 3 will b e a cake walk is that good thinking?
A quick look-up reveals that it uses something called a "Crystal Engine", not UT3.Gorath Alpha wrote...
Only if Deus Ex HR uses the UT3 game engine. Does it do so? I don't know; it's not on my own play list.Talosred wrote...
I am still going by if I can run Dues Ex HR very well mass effect 3 will b e a cake walk is that good thinking?
Gorath Alpha wrote...
Well, that's what happens when Projekt Red shuts off its forums. I never installed their sequel.
Retour en haut
