Is being a mage simply having the 'mage gene' or is it something more complex?
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 17 avril 2011 - 08:14 .
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 17 avril 2011 - 08:14 .
Modifié par hoorayforicecream, 17 avril 2011 - 01:15 .
Yes.hoorayforicecream wrote...
Does it really matter?
The Angry One wrote...
I was under the impression that they're fraternal twins, does it say they're identical?
hoorayforicecream wrote...
Edit: TAO - Maria is saying "if they were identical twins, would femCarver be a mage too?"
Herr Uhl wrote...
The Angry One wrote...
I was under the impression that they're fraternal twins, does it say they're identical?
The fact that they have different genders seems to imply that they aren't identical.
Modifié par bleetman, 17 avril 2011 - 01:33 .
Modifié par Gamer Ftw, 17 avril 2011 - 01:38 .
Modifié par Fruit of the Doom, 17 avril 2011 - 01:53 .
Maria Caliban wrote...
I wonder. We know mages tend to produce mages, and the Tevinter keep genealogical histories of mages for that reason.
Is being a mage simply having the 'mage gene' or is it something more complex?
Fruit of the Doom wrote...
The assertion that magical ability is somehow determined by heredity or the intrauterine environment is a myth propagated by the "Pro-Mage agenda" in a pathetic attempt to justify their immoral lifestyles.
Don't hate the mage, hate the casting!Fruit of the Doom wrote...
The assertion that magical ability is somehow determined by heredity or the intrauterine environment is a myth propagated by the "Pro-Mage agenda" in a pathetic attempt to justify their immoral lifestyles.
Fruit of the Doom wrote...
The assertion that magical ability is somehow determined by heredity or the intrauterine environment is a myth propagated by the "Pro-Mage agenda" in a pathetic attempt to justify their immoral lifestyles.
Maria Caliban wrote...
There are also the qunari who keep detailed and complete genalogical records for *everyone.*
Yet, they say magic is contagious. Is it possible the children of mages tend to be mages not because of a gene but because they interact with their magical parent?
Maria Caliban wrote...
Yet, they say magic is contagious. Is it possible the children of mages tend to be mages not because of a gene but because they interact with their magical parent?
Whether you catch a disease from someone is due to more than proximity. Women with Hepatitis C have only a 5% chance to spread it to their children because of maternal antibodies.The Angry One wrote...
Doubtful, Hawke seems to have regarded Malcolm fondly mage or not which would mean they spent a lot of time around him.Maria Caliban wrote...
There are also the qunari who keep detailed and complete genalogical records for *everyone.*
Yet, they say magic is contagious. Is it possible the children of mages tend to be mages not because of a gene but because they interact with their magical parent?
When is the earliest magical ability is seen in a child anyway?
Puberty makes sense.jlb524 wrote...
If that's the case there would need to be an age cut-off in which afterwards the child couldn't pick up the talent anymore....perhaps after their brain passes through a specific development stage. Adults cannot pick this up from other magical adults.
Modifié par Maria Caliban, 17 avril 2011 - 02:08 .